Euro Queens Hotel, Crystal Palace

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 16 of 21 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Penge Eagle Beckenham 22 Mar 17 7.09pm
Originally posted by eagleman13 Oh please let this go Gold . .Not only do we have a Mod but also a co founder of HOL involved. Its kin brilliant. Btw did the OP err enjoy his stay in said scummy hotel Just asking Noooo.... You can't say that, you might offend the hotel...! There's some law, you know that nobody knows, but it's there I tell you. But I think the bricks were made by a transgender Mexican and they have feelings and will be speaking to their lawyer. I can't believe there would be negative reviews on TripAdviser about that hotel and any others and they are still there online! Surely SOMEONE would have taken offence by a comment? As you can see by this thread, the Left want to control what the rest of us say and think and they can f*** off. Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 7.17pm)
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 22 Mar 17 7.09pm

Originally posted by eagleman13

Oh please let this go Gold . .Not only do we have a Mod but also a co founder of HOL involved. Its kin brilliant.

Btw did the OP err enjoy his stay in said scummy hotel

Just asking

Noooo.... You can't say that, you might offend the hotel...!

There's some law, you know that nobody knows, but it's there I tell you.

But I think the bricks were made by a transgender Mexican and they have feelings and will be speaking to their lawyer.

I can't believe there would be negative reviews on TripAdviser about that hotel and any others and they are still there online! Surely SOMEONE would have taken offence by a comment?

As you can see by this thread, the Left want to control what the rest of us say and think and they can f*** off.

Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 7.17pm)

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 22 Mar 17 7.19pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle Noooo.... You can't say that, you might offend the hotel...! There's some law, you know that nobody knows, but it's there I tell you. But I think the bricks were made by a transgender Mexican and they have feelings and will be speaking to their lawyer. As you can see by this thread, the Left want to control what we say and think and they can f*** off. Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 7.11pm) I apologise PE . . I shouldve had more sensativity for the holel . . My bad. Now you come to mention it i do recall somewhere in the far distant past tha Mexican Transgender lefties were involed or oppressed. I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold, When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul. [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleman13

On The Road To Hell & Alicante 22 Mar 17 7.19pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

Noooo.... You can't say that, you might offend the hotel...!

There's some law, you know that nobody knows, but it's there I tell you.

But I think the bricks were made by a transgender Mexican and they have feelings and will be speaking to their lawyer.

As you can see by this thread, the Left want to control what we say and think and they can f*** off.

Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 7.11pm)

I apologise PE . .

I shouldve had more sensativity for the holel . . My bad.

Now you come to mention it i do recall somewhere in the far distant past tha Mexican Transgender lefties were involed or oppressed.

I'm a blind man, i'm a blind man, now my room is cold,
When a blind man cries, Lord, he feels it from his soul.
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 22 Mar 17 7.32pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 It probably wouldn't be classed as a hate crime, unless it was directly linked with an act of violence, as Millwall fans are not a protected group in law. But if you said white Millwall fans are scum, it would be a crime A hate crime is a crime motivated by intolerance to an individual origin, ethnicity, gender etc. So there'd have to be a crime in the first place. Speaking is not a crime, but committing violence is. Also, an ethnic group cannot make a defamation claim, only individuals and would have to prove their reputation has been harmed in court.
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 22 Mar 17 7.32pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

It probably wouldn't be classed as a hate crime, unless it was directly linked with an act of violence, as Millwall fans are not a protected group in law.

But if you said white Millwall fans are scum, it would be a crime

A hate crime is a crime motivated by intolerance to an individual origin, ethnicity, gender etc. So there'd have to be a crime in the first place. Speaking is not a crime, but committing violence is.

Also, an ethnic group cannot make a defamation claim, only individuals and would have to prove their reputation has been harmed in court.

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Southampton_Eagle At the after party 22 Mar 17 7.37pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle Noooo.... You can't say that, you might offend the hotel...! There's some law, you know that nobody knows, but it's there I tell you. But I think the bricks were made by a transgender Mexican and they have feelings and will be speaking to their lawyer. I can't believe there would be negative reviews on TripAdviser about that hotel and any others and they are still there online! Surely SOMEONE would have taken offence by a comment? As you can see by this thread, the Left want to control what the rest of us say and think and they can f*** off. Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 7.17pm) F*cking transgender Mexicans. Always have to get shirty about things. Need to change their tampons and man up.
Alert a moderator to this post

Southampton_Eagle

At the after party 22 Mar 17 7.37pm

Send a Private Message to Southampton_Eagle

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

Noooo.... You can't say that, you might offend the hotel...!

There's some law, you know that nobody knows, but it's there I tell you.

But I think the bricks were made by a transgender Mexican and they have feelings and will be speaking to their lawyer.

I can't believe there would be negative reviews on TripAdviser about that hotel and any others and they are still there online! Surely SOMEONE would have taken offence by a comment?

As you can see by this thread, the Left want to control what the rest of us say and think and they can f*** off.

Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 7.17pm)

F*cking transgender Mexicans. Always have to get shirty about things. Need to change their tampons and man up.

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 22 Mar 17 7.44pm
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle Fcking transgender Mexicans. Always have to get shirty about things. Need to change their tampons and man up. And the b*****s are on Tinder. Not that I know. A friend told me.
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 22 Mar 17 7.44pm

Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle

F*cking transgender Mexicans. Always have to get shirty about things. Need to change their tampons and man up.

And the b******s are on Tinder. Not that I know. A friend told me.

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Kermit8 Hevon 22 Mar 17 7.52pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle A hate crime is a crime motivated by intolerance to an individual origin, ethnicity, gender etc. So there'd have to be a crime in the first place. Speaking is not a crime, but committing violence is. Also, an ethnic group cannot make a defamation claim, only individuals and would have to prove their reputation has been harmed in court. Oh, yes it can be - It's like having to teach a class of of Kidults this place sometimes. "Statutes[edit] In England and Wales the Public Order Act 1986 prohibits, by its Part 3, expressions of racial hatred, which is defined as hatred against a group of persons by reason of the group's colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins. Section 18 of the Act says: A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if� they intend thereby to stir up racial hatred, or having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby. Offences under Part 3 carry a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment or a fine or both.[6] The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 inserted Section 4A into the Public Order Act 1986. That part prohibits anyone from causing alarm or distress. Section 4A states: (1) A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he� uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress." Edited by Kermit8 (22 Mar 2017 7.54pm) Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 22 Mar 17 7.52pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

A hate crime is a crime motivated by intolerance to an individual origin, ethnicity, gender etc. So there'd have to be a crime in the first place. Speaking is not a crime, but committing violence is.

Also, an ethnic group cannot make a defamation claim, only individuals and would have to prove their reputation has been harmed in court.

Oh, yes it can be - It's like having to teach a class of of Kidults this place sometimes.

"Statutes[edit]
In England and Wales the Public Order Act 1986 prohibits, by its Part 3, expressions of racial hatred, which is defined as hatred against a group of persons by reason of the group's colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins. Section 18 of the Act says:

A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if�

they intend thereby to stir up racial hatred, or
having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby.
Offences under Part 3 carry a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment or a fine or both.[6]

The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 inserted Section 4A into the Public Order Act 1986. That part prohibits anyone from causing alarm or distress. Section 4A states:

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he� uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress."

Edited by Kermit8 (22 Mar 2017 7.54pm)

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Pista Bristol 22 Mar 17 7.54pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle YES! I know it might upset you snowflakes... Doesn't upset me in the slightest. You might not be a hypocrite but you're definitely a c�nt! Just wanted to check first that you're cool with me sharing that opinion. Edited by Pista (22 Mar 2017 7.57pm) old time bbs refugee
Alert a moderator to this post

Pista

Bristol 22 Mar 17 7.54pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

YES! I know it might upset you snowflakes...

Doesn't upset me in the slightest. You might not be a hypocrite but you're definitely a c�nt!

Just wanted to check first that you're cool with me sharing that opinion.

Edited by Pista (22 Mar 2017 7.57pm)

old time bbs refugee

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 22 Mar 17 8.11pm
He's not a cvnt - he's just a bit dim. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 22 Mar 17 8.11pm

He's not a cvnt - he's just a bit dim.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Penge Eagle Beckenham 22 Mar 17 8.16pm
Originally posted by Pista Doesn't upset me in the slightest. You might not be a hypocrite but you're definitely a c�nt! Just wanted to check first that you're cool with me sharing that opinion. Edited by Pista (22 Mar 2017 7.57pm) I may not have taken offence, but you have just broken the HOL rules, which you agreed to adhere to when you signed up to this forum. Bit risky when you're already on a yellow card...
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 22 Mar 17 8.16pm

Originally posted by Pista

Doesn't upset me in the slightest. You might not be a hypocrite but you're definitely a c�nt!

Just wanted to check first that you're cool with me sharing that opinion.

Edited by Pista (22 Mar 2017 7.57pm)

I may not have taken offence, but you have just broken the HOL rules, which you agreed to adhere to when you signed up to this forum. Bit risky when you're already on a yellow card...

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Penge Eagle Beckenham 22 Mar 17 8.33pm
Originally posted by Kermit8 Oh, yes it can be - It's like having to teach a class of of Kidults this place sometimes. "Statutes[edit] In England and Wales the Public Order Act 1986 prohibits, by its Part 3, expressions of racial hatred, which is defined as hatred against a group of persons by reason of the group's colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins. Section 18 of the Act says: A person who uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or displays any written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting, is guilty of an offence if� they intend thereby to stir up racial hatred, or having regard to all the circumstances racial hatred is likely to be stirred up thereby. Offences under Part 3 carry a maximum sentence of seven years imprisonment or a fine or both.[6] The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 inserted Section 4A into the Public Order Act 1986. That part prohibits anyone from causing alarm or distress. Section 4A states: (1) A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he� uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress." Edited by Kermit8 (22 Mar 2017 7.54pm) I do know what hate speech is, thank you. But in the context of what the poster said, it is not hate speech! As far as I'm aware, the poster did not even speak to the said group of people! You and the others on the far Left want to police our language under the 'catch all' Hate Speech law. You may be a Scottish prick, but do I breach the law? Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 8.50pm)
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

Penge Eagle

Beckenham 22 Mar 17 8.33pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

Oh, yes it can be - It's like having to teach a class of of Kidults this place sometimes.

Edited by Kermit8 (22 Mar 2017 7.54pm)

I do know what hate speech is, thank you. But in the context of what the poster said, it is not hate speech! As far as I'm aware, the poster did not even speak to the said group of people! You and the others on the far Left want to police our language under the 'catch all' Hate Speech law. You may be a Scottish prick, but do I breach the law?

Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 8.50pm)

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

becky over the moon 22 Mar 17 8.49pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle I do know what hate speech is, thank you. But In the context of what the poster said, it is not hate speech! You may be a Scottish prick, but do I breach the law? Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 8.36pm) Ooooooh! Does saying "you may be" before you call them something offensive fall into the same category as saying "allegedly" before you say something libellous? A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 22 Mar 17 8.49pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

I do know what hate speech is, thank you. But In the context of what the poster said, it is not hate speech! You may be a Scottish prick, but do I breach the law?

Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 8.36pm)

Ooooooh! Does saying "you may be" before you call them something offensive fall into the same category as saying "allegedly" before you say something libellous?

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 22 Mar 17 8.58pm
Originally posted by Penge Eagle I do know what hate speech is, thank you. But in the context of what the poster said, it is not hate speech! As far as I'm aware, the poster did not even speak to the said group of people! You and the others on the far Left want to police our language under the 'catch all' Hate Speech law. You may be a Scottish prick, but do I breach the law? Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 8.50pm) SCOTTISH? He's as f***ing Scottish as I am !! Pro USA & Israel
Alert a moderator to this post

Jimenez

SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 22 Mar 17 8.58pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

Edited by Penge Eagle (22 Mar 2017 8.50pm)

SCOTTISH? He's as f***ing Scottish as I am !!

Pro USA & Israel

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 16 of 21 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Euro Queens Hotel, Crystal Palace

Site Map

Sponsors