You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Martin McGuinness
April 23 2024 10.34pm

Martin McGuinness

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 22 of 30 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

 

View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 26 Mar 17 9.09pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

The Inquiry concluded (as reported by the Telegraph) that:

"Despite the contrary evidence given by soldiers, we have concluded that none of them fired in response to attacks or threatened attacks by nail or petrol bombers." The report added that no one threw, or threatened to throw, nail or petrol bombs at soldiers;

The explanations given by soldiers were rejected, with a number said to have "knowingly put forward false accounts"

Members of the so-called Official IRA fired a shot at troops, but missed their target, though crucially it was concluded it was the paratroopers who shot first on Bloody Sunday;

..The firing by soldiers of 1 Para caused the deaths of 13 people and injury to a similar number, none of whom was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury." This also applied to the 14th victim, who died later from injuries. The report added: "We found no instances where it appeared to us that soldiers either were or might have been justified in firing";


And, yes, McGuinness had blood on his hands in relation to the Troubles,as did Paisley and as do the army for Bloody Sunday.

Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 8.52pm)

I think it's great that you spend so much time and energy highlighting the limitations of the British army and standing up for justice. Well done you. And in your eagerness to set the record straight, it's truly magnanimous of you to acknowledge the part McGuiness played in the blood shed.

I do hope that you never need the flawed British Army to defend you.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 26 Mar 17 9.20pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

The Inquiry concluded (as reported by the Telegraph) that:

"Despite the contrary evidence given by soldiers, we have concluded that none of them fired in response to attacks or threatened attacks by nail or petrol bombers." The report added that no one threw, or threatened to throw, nail or petrol bombs at soldiers;

The explanations given by soldiers were rejected, with a number said to have "knowingly put forward false accounts"

Members of the so-called Official IRA fired a shot at troops, but missed their target, though crucially it was concluded it was the paratroopers who shot first on Bloody Sunday;

..The firing by soldiers of 1 Para caused the deaths of 13 people and injury to a similar number, none of whom was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury." This also applied to the 14th victim, who died later from injuries. The report added: "We found no instances where it appeared to us that soldiers either were or might have been justified in firing";


And, yes, McGuinness had blood on his hands in relation to the Troubles,as did Paisley and as do the army for Bloody Sunday.


Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 8.52pm)

Yes, that's why I said they shot rioters in the belief that they had been shot at, a mistaken belief it appears.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 26 Mar 17 9.24pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

The Inquiry concluded (as reported by the Telegraph) that:

"Despite the contrary evidence given by soldiers, we have concluded that none of them fired in response to attacks or threatened attacks by nail or petrol bombers." The report added that no one threw, or threatened to throw, nail or petrol bombs at soldiers;

The explanations given by soldiers were rejected, with a number said to have "knowingly put forward false accounts"

Members of the so-called Official IRA fired a shot at troops, but missed their target, though crucially it was concluded it was the paratroopers who shot first on Bloody Sunday;

..The firing by soldiers of 1 Para caused the deaths of 13 people and injury to a similar number, none of whom was posing a threat of causing death or serious injury." This also applied to the 14th victim, who died later from injuries. The report added: "We found no instances where it appeared to us that soldiers either were or might have been justified in firing";


And, yes, McGuinness had blood on his hands in relation to the Troubles,as did Paisley and as do the army for Bloody Sunday.

Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 8.52pm)

How many people did Paisley kill, or even order to kill?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 26 Mar 17 9.54pm

The man upped the ante hugely between 1968-1972 and was a key player in setting the stage for the paramilitary bloodbath that unfolded..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 26 Mar 17 10.01pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

The man upped the ante hugely between 1968-1972 and was a key player in setting the stage for the paramilitary bloodbath that unfolded..

Yes, but how many people did Paisley kill, or even order to kill?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 26 Mar 17 10.01pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I think it's great that you spend so much time and energy highlighting the limitations of the British army and standing up for justice. Well done you. And in your eagerness to set the record straight, it's truly magnanimous of you to acknowledge the part McGuiness played in the blood shed.

I do hope that you never need the flawed British Army to defend you.

Boy, such bitterness me thinks.

Its precisely the ability (and desirability where appropriate)of being able to criticise our leaders and military etc that sets us apart from totalitarian regimes....another of those traditional British values (like an independent judiciary) little Englanders tend to bang on about in theory but complain about in practice.

Bloody Sunday (like Amritsar 1919,the Croke Park massacre,1920, Athens 1944 and Batang Kali 1948,as examples of other instances ) was bad and plain wrong.The day our military (notwithstanding some of the great things it has done) are immune from legitimate criticism is the day our traditional values fly out of the window..

Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 10.12pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 26 Mar 17 10.13pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

Boy, such bitterness me thinks.

Its precisely the ability (and desirability where appropriate)of being able to criticise our leaders and military etc that sets us apart from totalitarian regimes....another of those traditional British values (like an independent judiciary) little Englanders tend to bang on about in theory but complain about in practice.

Bloody Sunday (like Amritsar 1919,the Croke Park massacre,1920, Athens 1944 and Batang Kali 1948,as examples of other other instances ) was bad and plain wrong.The day our military (notwithstanding some of the great things it has done) are immune from legitimate criticism is the day our traditional values fly out of the window..

Edited by legaleagle (26 Mar 2017 10.09pm)

Who is saying Bloody Sunday was not bad, of course it was? However, Martin McGuinness was responsible for far more death, maiming and misery in Northern Ireland than the British Army and Ian Paisley put together. But you and the rest of the left wing dupes will not acknowledge it.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 26 Mar 17 10.38pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Who is saying Bloody Sunday was not bad, of course it was? However, Martin McGuinness was responsible for far more death, maiming and misery in Northern Ireland than the British Army and Ian Paisley put together. But you and the rest of the left wing dupes will not acknowledge it.

Always with the sly digs.

Interesting reading on the use of language... [Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 26 Mar 17 10.54pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by Y Ddraig Goch

I don't think anyone engaged in activity that justified the army's response. What happened was awful and unecessary but several witnesses claim to have seen him with a machine gun. Enough for the judge to think it was likely. However I am sure that happens on any peaceful demo.

The IRA played their hand very well, the army didn't. Not helped by the fact that it was the Paras on the streets, a great highly trained and highly aggressive fighting force, unfortunately not what was required on the day.

As for blood on his hands, because he wasn't prosecuted you think that makes him in the clear? Given the reputation for IRA discipline how can you explain the self proclaimed 2ic of the Belfast Brigade not having blood on his hands?

He was remember a convicted member, for carrying a bomb. What do you think that was for? Fishing for pike?


Edited by Y Ddraig Goch (26 Mar 2017 8.45pm)

Hi,

'Blood on their hands' could apply to any of the parties in this war.

There are 2 terror offences against McGuinness for membership of the IRA and withholding information.

Also petty offences obstruction some driving in the 80's with small fines. It looks like a kind of 'stop and search' with him occasionally having a go back. It does seem the police are not keen for him to lose his liberty tho, just keeping the pressure up.

In my view he was not prosecuted again because there was nothing he would be convicted for and there must have been constant surveillance.

His political success in driving the peace process a complete surprise of course we all thought he was a terrorist nutter being made Minister of Education but he turned it all around and there is plenty to thank him for quite remarkable.

I think Scotland and Northern Ireland may leave the union quite soon.

.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 26 Mar 17 11.59pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Hi,

'Blood on their hands' could apply to any of the parties in this war.

There are 2 terror offences against McGuinness for membership of the IRA and withholding information.

Also petty offences obstruction some driving in the 80's with small fines. It looks like a kind of 'stop and search' with him occasionally having a go back. It does seem the police are not keen for him to lose his liberty tho, just keeping the pressure up.

In my view he was not prosecuted again because there was nothing he would be convicted for and there must have been constant surveillance.

His political success in driving the peace process a complete surprise of course we all thought he was a terrorist nutter being made Minister of Education but he turned it all around and there is plenty to thank him for quite remarkable.

I think Scotland and Northern Ireland may leave the union quite soon.

.

Would that render the Union Jack obsolete.

That would upset a few Brexiters if that was an unintended consequence of voting leave.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 27 Mar 17 12.11am Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Would that render the Union Jack obsolete.

That would upset a few Brexiters if that was an unintended consequence of voting leave.

Don't you have work in the morning?

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 27 Mar 17 12.37am

Originally posted by Jimenez

Don't you have work in the morning?

Yep. And?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 22 of 30 < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Martin McGuinness