We own wickham and he has played 40 odd games and will play many more , he also scored the goal that got us to the cup final , remy has made 7 appearances most as a sub and cost the best part of 5/6 million in fees and wages , terrible comparison.

Wow, you think you know me so well, don't you?
If you spend your time playing computer games (and if that's normal for your age) please don't think everyone does.

I said Milivojevic (that's his name ok? MILIVOJEVIC. Try saying it) hasn't proven himself yet. You claim I said he is poor. I never said Sakho is a waste of money. How could I when he didn't cost anything? He's been great this spring, a really good short-term investment. What I actually said was that it would be a waste to pay 20-30 million for him.

Edited by mattteo (12 Apr 2017 9.00pm)

Well I've seen you say that kasbele and mbemba is better than Sakho because they have more potential(classic football manager term). If you actually made sense it would be worth debating. You seem to have information on 400 + players. How you get so much time to watch all these matches considering you have seen them all live and not a computer screen.

Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Arsenal has other incomes. Paying 36 million is like Palace paying 10 million

have an opinion that a thought rather than a stat based opinion. Your threads seems as if you think your wiser than most other posters on hol. We all have a passion for football but we don't all claimed that carrick better because of pass accuracy or whatever you spout.

Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

He cost 7 million and he has played a lot more than Remy , and yes it is better because we can actually sell wickham if we choose too , remy will go back to Chelsea having cost 5/6 million and having done nothing. No losses ? Your maths isn't great is it , remy cost 2 million to loan , and earns around 80 grand a week and has played the grand total of about 200 mins , most of them being in the Fa cup.