You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Is The Department for Education 'Fit for Purpose'?
April 18 2024 1.08pm

Is The Department for Education 'Fit for Purpose'?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 8 of 8 << First< 4 5 6 7 8

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 05 May 17 2.30pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

Laugh Out Loud. The whole concept and creation of the NHS was down to who, exactly?

The United States?

It would not have happened without money borrowed from them after the war which we only finished paying back a few years ago.

It's a shame that every Labour government since has failed to solve the problems with sustaining it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mr_Gristle's Profile Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 05 May 17 7.08pm Send a Private Message to Mr_Gristle Add Mr_Gristle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The United States?

It would not have happened without money borrowed from them after the war which we only finished paying back a few years ago.

It's a shame that every Labour government since has failed to solve the problems with sustaining it.

LOL again. Your desperation to slur anything "labour" is comical.

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Sportyteacher's Profile Sportyteacher Flag London 06 May 17 12.12pm Send a Private Message to Sportyteacher Add Sportyteacher as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The United States?

It would not have happened without money borrowed from them after the war which we only finished paying back a few years ago.

It's a shame that every Labour government since has failed to solve the problems with sustaining it.

As if past and present Conservative Governments can take any credit for positive action? Nope...didn't think so! (If anything, the Tories continue to run the NHS into the ground to the point that the only means of rescue is via privatisation , much like our schools) Funny how the Tories one policy promise at the moment seems to be based around Brexit whilst they seem invisible regarding the infrastructure of the rest of the country, probably because we are going to be paying BIG time for the mistake of leaving the EU.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 06 Sep 17 9.31pm

[Link]

Chances are, your kids don't have a permanent teacher.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View ex hibitionist's Profile ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 06 Sep 17 11.31pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

I am a teacher, reluctantly, done a few years supply in secondaries, now in FE.

Academies, like the utilities, NHS bureacracy and privatised rail firms are just gravy trains - the privatisation-lite brings no extra efficiency just a lot of sh*tkickers on the make.

Ofsted are the problem not the solution - all tick box quantifiable philistinism, bureacratic inertia - I've seen foreign language schools who teach German and Japanese businessmen and have to survive in the market - their ideas and training are light years ahead of the state sector, although iniatives like Teach First have tried to fund top scholars into the state system, they're usually robotic hooray henrys with no clue in front of lairy kids.

Forget free schools, academies whatever, all just skirting round the problem - abolish the charitable status for private schools and you'll see the biggest social revolution in this country since Atlee's govt, maybe since Asquith's ... the culture here is you have to pay to get a rounded education with practitioners who have tested their subject knowledge in the real world, understand the link between advanced and basic levels and so know how both to simplify, explain the purpose of their teaching and make it relevant and interesting - but this service is only for elites, it's too good for ordinary folk - it's the English curse: snobbery. I t extends to the toffs playing wugger while the chavs play footy, that's why we're crap at both. No such divide in other countries, football in Italy or Germany is not 'non-U', here we have crap concepts like that, and I believe they go deeper and have more influence than is generally realised.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 8 of 8 << First< 4 5 6 7 8

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Is The Department for Education 'Fit for Purpose'?