I'm not sure what you mean by profit from it? Offering alternative counter terrorism strategies? Is that profiting? Or is this just a new stick to beat him with?

Is he allowed to mention Manchester?

Edit. What Corbyn will say according to the Guardian...

our foreign policy reduces rather than increases the threat to this country … Many experts, including professionals in our intelligence and security services, have pointed to the connections between wars our government has supported or fought in other countries and terrorism here at home.

But Corbyn will also say:

That assessment in no way reduces the guilt of those who attack our children. Those terrorists will forever be reviled and held to account for their actions. But an informed understanding of the causes of terrorism is an essential part of an effective response that will protect the security of our people that fights rather than fuels terrorism.

Edited by nickgusset (26 May 2017 8.00am)

I don't disagree in principle with what he's saying. Though it is ironic that those supporting him were the same that voted blairs labour in who took us to war.

However, what I do disagree with is the timing of it. On Monday, he was on the social care attack. Now all of a sudden he's focusing on terroism. Wonder why? Blatant disrespectful profiteering

And the Tories won't be playing it as an issue for all its worth between now and 8 June?

I'm not a Tory but if they do then I condemn it too. Main point I have made on this thread is that using Manchester as a chance to political point score is pathetic and disrespectful. Nicks doing it as is his esteemed leade.

Maybe, but I hear that May will privatise the handcart and well all have to pay.

None of them have our best interests at heart, and never have.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]