As an experiment, what do people think would happen if everybody simply ignored his posts? No responses whatsoever. Like the vegan gentleman from the other day, he seems to thrive on the wind-up. The more annoyed people get with him the better he likes it. If a radical leftist agitator rants in the forest does it make a sound?

I think partly to stoke up tensions (frothing at the mouth is what they are aiming for from their readers) but also they think it's what will get the most clicks/sell most papers. DM had article along the lines of "Man City ace Jesus leaves Manchester after bombing" - truth is he left the day before and was on his regular scheduled post season holidays. Literally anything to get a click.

Should also say it's not just DM, they all do it. Guardian are just as liable to flashing red headlines and printing pictures, they just try and pretend they're being classy about it.

What s*** are we in exactly?

Ha. Yes. The whole political class seemed to want to rush to war.

But there's still a lot on Cameron and May's shoulders. Cutting back of police forces, etc.

f***ing hell nick....change the record...they didn't create the nut jobs...nothing of this down to cutting back police.
If we had 20000 more police there would still be over 3000 would be terrorist...stop trying to spin and blame everyone else except the people who are...the terrorists.

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

[Link]

Despite our best efforts, it's inevitable that there will be civilian casualties. However to my mind, events like this will fuel further hatred of 'the west'.

It's a difficult call as we want to hit ISIS where it hurts, but, could it be counter productive when we know it will be used as propaganda to recruit more jihadists.

I don't know the answer.