You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Theresa May
April 24 2024 8.31am

Theresa May

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 38 of 42 < 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 >

 

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 20 Jul 17 5.21pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Lots of 'progressives' within Labour know that to change society you have to bring its current model down.....I don't think they are all that worried about debt...because secretly in their minds all that will be wiped or become unimportant within a new order.

For a lot of them it's about 'feelings' and 'justice' before any practical elements of capitalism.

Most of us were left wingers when we were young and didn't really understand capitalism and socialism nor how to compare to other systems. Plenty of people grow out of being left wing once they start paying any significant taxes as adults.....Many never do and unsurprisingly their political position doesn't change.

In my travels in life I met a few left wing minded people with high minded ideals for others but who also put a lot of effort into paying as little tax as possible.

They may not like to reflect upon it...but for many of them it isn't about rationality but rather self interest....Or...if they aren't at the party then let the party burn.....A kind of resentment born of envy.....In some respects a justified resentment but that's how it seems to me.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 5.02pm)

I think a lot of it is them simply ignoring history. There have been attempts to create societies without capitalism driving the economy, with no huge disparities in wealth, the holy grail of 'equality' more or less achieved, the state ensuring full employment, housing and health care. All of these implementations of what the left want ended in failure, and while they were in being were characterised by the people they were supposedly championing making every effort to flee the countries to get to capitalist countries. Along with of course total repression of the sorts of freedoms the left enjoy in the societies they hate so much.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 20 Jul 17 5.28pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

I think a lot of it is them simply ignoring history. There have been attempts to create societies without capitalism driving the economy, with no huge disparities in wealth, the holy grail of 'equality' more or less achieved, the state ensuring full employment, housing and health care. All of these implementations of what the left want ended in failure, and while they were in being were characterised by the people they were supposedly championing making every effort to flee the countries to get to capitalist countries. Along with of course total repression of the sorts of freedoms the left enjoy in the societies they hate so much.

I don't think that you can have a society with limited resources, which doesn't require some kind of capitalism. Socialism works better as a critique of the problems of capitalism, as presenting a means of regulating against those problems, than as a means of creating a better society.

Changing an economic model won't create a better society, just a different one. We've seen that when trying to introduce democracy to a country without the progress of change that led to the rise of democratic systems.

And of course changing an economic model doesn't reflect in a change in people to accept it either.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 20 Jul 17 5.34pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Lots of 'progressives' within Labour know that to change society you have to bring its current model down.....I don't think they are all that worried about debt...because secretly in their minds all that will be wiped or become unimportant within a new order.

For a lot of them it's about 'feelings' and 'justice' before any practical elements of capitalism.

Most of us were left wingers when we were young and didn't really understand capitalism and socialism nor how to compare to other systems. Plenty of people grow out of being left wing once they start paying any significant taxes as adults.....Many never do and unsurprisingly their political position doesn't change.

In my travels in life I met a few left wing minded people with high minded ideals for others but who also put a lot of effort into paying as little tax as possible.

They may not like to reflect upon it...but for many of them it isn't about rationality but rather self interest....Or...if they aren't at the party then let the party burn.....A kind of resentment born of envy.....In some respects a justified resentment but that's how it seems to me.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 5.02pm)

This is very true Stirling,I live in a nice village in north Bedfordshire with lots of quite high priced houses and some local authority housing.
We have our fair share of champagne socialists who preach one thing and practise another.
God help the local builder or van driver if they leave their vans on the high street....there is uproar.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 20 Jul 17 5.39pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

No you can't. It would be highly unscientific to do so because there are far too many unknown factors.

Have you head of econometrics?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 20 Jul 17 5.47pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I don't think that you can have a society with limited resources, which doesn't require some kind of capitalism. Socialism works better as a critique of the problems of capitalism, as presenting a means of regulating against those problems, than as a means of creating a better society.

Changing an economic model won't create a better society, just a different one. We've seen that when trying to introduce democracy to a country without the progress of change that led to the rise of democratic systems.

And of course changing an economic model doesn't reflect in a change in people to accept it either.

The societies I described implemented what many on the left here call for, cradle to grave state support in terms of jobs, housing, education, health care etc (albeit many got to the grave bit a lot quicker than they expected to). So we have the economic and social policies that the left call for seen in practice - and seen to fail. Why can't the left see this?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 20 Jul 17 5.50pm

Originally posted by elgrande


their vans on the high street....there is uproar.

Damn right should be a lynching.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 20 Jul 17 6.28pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

Have you head of econometrics?

Have you heard of pseudoscience?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 20 Jul 17 6.46pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

I don't think that you can have a society with limited resources, which doesn't require some kind of capitalism. Socialism works better as a critique of the problems of capitalism, as presenting a means of regulating against those problems, than as a means of creating a better society.

Changing an economic model won't create a better society, just a different one. We've seen that when trying to introduce democracy to a country without the progress of change that led to the rise of democratic systems.

And of course changing an economic model doesn't reflect in a change in people to accept it either.

This is how I like to think of it as well....the principle of socialism in the sense of trying to move towards a fairer society....It being used as a check upon the worst excesses of capitalism....In think in part that's where a lot of the west is.

Of course the argument about what a 'fairer' society looks like is a different debate but I think the idea that socialism is best when it modifies capitalism is a good one....Just as long as capitalism is the system driving the car....Socialism can hold the map....But never look to take over.

Capitalism and Socialism can be compared to the Sun....Insomuch as capitalism is the nuclear process pushing the expansion preventing collaspe while socialism works like gravity containing the expansion and pushing back.

Find a happy medium and you get the best of both....let one dominate too much and inevitably it all goes Pete Tong.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 6.47pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 20 Jul 17 7.27pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

This is how I like to think of it as well....the principle of socialism in the sense of trying to move towards a fairer society....It being used as a check upon the worst excesses of capitalism....In think in part that's where a lot of the west is.

Of course the argument about what a 'fairer' society looks like is a different debate but I think the idea that socialism is best when it modifies capitalism is a good one....Just as long as capitalism is the system driving the car....Socialism can hold the map....But never look to take over.

Capitalism and Socialism can be compared to the Sun....Insomuch as capitalism is the nuclear process pushing the expansion preventing collaspe while socialism works like gravity containing the expansion and pushing back.

Find a happy medium and you get the best of both....let one dominate too much and inevitably it all goes Pete Tong.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 6.47pm)

Yer right. But the pendulum has swung too far towards f*** the poor to help the rich.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 20 Jul 17 7.59pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Yer right. But the pendulum has swung too far towards f*** the poor to help the rich.

You can't help the poor without incentivizing the rich.

The idea that you can make the wealthy pay up is the lie that socialism sells to the poor.

Your belief system has a far worst affect upon the poor than the pure capitalist.

Your intentions are better....if we ignore the reality of self interest....your intentions are better than the capitalist but the ultimate affect is far worse.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Jul 2017 8.00pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 21 Jul 17 11.33am Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Have you heard of pseudoscience?

I'll take that response as a no.

I can assure you that econometrics is no pseudoscience and employs mathematical rigour at its heart.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View DanH's Profile DanH Online Flag SW2 21 Jul 17 11.35am Send a Private Message to DanH Add DanH as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

I'll take that response as a no.

I can assure you that econometrics is no pseudoscience and employs mathematical rigour at its heart.

Econometrics was the absolute bane of my life at Uni.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 38 of 42 < 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Theresa May