You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Great Academy or a neglected one
April 25 2024 5.56pm

Great Academy or a neglected one

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

 

View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 28 Jun 17 6.56pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Goldfiinger

Parish recently said he feels we have up to three midfielders who may be able to break through and he didnt want to block there progress by buying players in there positions.

I'd imagine FdB will make his own mind up once he's had some time reviewing them.

With that being said it wouldn't suprise me if no new midfielders joined in this window. Although personally I think we could do with a play maker.

Yes I agree.

Perhaps Will Hughes might have been a good signing at £7.5 Mill but of course he has no PL experience.
We need a 'Jonjo Shelvey'.
Not been impressed at all with Puncheon last seaason.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dan89's Profile Dan89 Flag Se25 28 Jun 17 7.09pm Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Yes I agree.

Perhaps Will Hughes might have been a good signing at £7.5 Mill but of course he has no PL experience.
We need a 'Jonjo Shelvey'.
Not been impressed at all with Puncheon last seaason.

Puncheon not to score a single goal in last season is terrible. Personally think we need 2 midfielders. After losing Ledley and flamini. If Luka gets a long term injury, then we have no first team defensive mid.

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
GladAllOver27 Flag 28 Jun 17 8.48pm

Question- should Gary `Issot be shown the door. In a new revamp in the academy structure.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View EagleinSF's Profile EagleinSF Flag San Fransisco 28 Jun 17 9.10pm Send a Private Message to EagleinSF Add EagleinSF as a friend

Originally posted by GladAllOver27

Question- should Gary `Issot be shown the door

Wow - he's been with us all this time and he still doesn't know how to get in

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Canterbury Palace's Profile Canterbury Palace Flag Whitstable 28 Jun 17 9.43pm Send a Private Message to Canterbury Palace Add Canterbury Palace as a friend

When in the Championship, within a few years of one another we produced Watson, Soares, Borrowdale, Wilf, Clyne, Moses, Williams and Bostock and at that stage our academy was being talked about as being one of the most productive in the country. However, with the benefit of hindsight, it's only really Zaha, Moses and Clyne who have done anything of note (Watson to a lesser degree). Is that enough over a ten year period for a club with relatively little competition in South East London? Not so sure.

Would be extremely happy if we invested heavily in the academy, as fun as marquee signings are, the fans will always take a local player to heart.

 


We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 28 Jun 17 10.18pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace

When in the Championship, within a few years of one another we produced Watson, Soares, Borrowdale, Wilf, Clyne, Moses, Williams and Bostock and at that stage our academy was being talked about as being one of the most productive in the country. However, with the benefit of hindsight, it's only really Zaha, Moses and Clyne who have done anything of note (Watson to a lesser degree). Is that enough over a ten year period for a club with relatively little competition in South East London? Not so sure.

Would be extremely happy if we invested heavily in the academy, as fun as marquee signings are, the fans will always take a local player to heart.

Fulham were treading into our territory picking up players during their long stint in the prem. And that wasn't just London boroughs but also Redhill postcodes. Now Brighton are venturing into that area. Really we should be aiming to get the best lads right down to Horley, but we aren't. Not only Arsenal pick up the best but smaller clubs have been picking up the next best.

If we can't do that then it's always an uphill battle. We need the best to play the laws of probability. It's not enough to sign up the best in the old Shirley league which I think is now the Tandridge 'A' league and the best in the few borough teams around us, and I bet they're shared between the usual suspects. We should start having a more proactive and, dare I say it, a more aggressive recruiting policy like Southampton. It's what Man Utd did before they recruited 'the class of 92.' I'm not saying that can be done again in the premier league today, but it could give us an edge over the bottom half and save and make a lot of money at some point in time.

If Parish is reading this then it is something that could do with addressing. But I guess we need category A status first as a selling point when a scout speaks to kid, parents and his coach after the match they've been watched in.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (28 Jun 2017 10.20pm)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Painter's Profile Painter Flag Croydon 28 Jun 17 10.28pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace

When in the Championship, within a few years of one another we produced Watson, Soares, Borrowdale, Wilf, Clyne, Moses, Williams and Bostock and at that stage our academy was being talked about as being one of the most productive in the country. However, with the benefit of hindsight, it's only really Zaha, Moses and Clyne who have done anything of note (Watson to a lesser degree). Is that enough over a ten year period for a club with relatively little competition in South East London? Not so sure.

Would be extremely happy if we invested heavily in the academy, as fun as marquee signings are, the fans will always take a local player to heart.

It's a romantic idea, that we put youngsters in the first team, but in reality it ain't going to happen. It doesn't matter how good the academy is, it's just to bigger jump in standard. The only possible way they can ever get in the first team now is by going on loan in the lower leagues and impressing against older players, not other youngsters.
Look at England U23s, outclassed by the Germans who had 40 shots on goal, these were the top U23s we have and hardly any play in their clubs first team regularly.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Canterbury Palace's Profile Canterbury Palace Flag Whitstable 28 Jun 17 10.38pm Send a Private Message to Canterbury Palace Add Canterbury Palace as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Fulham were treading into our territory picking up players during their long stint in the prem. And that wasn't just London boroughs but also Redhill postcodes. Now Brighton are venturing into that area. Really we should be aiming to get the best lads right down to Horley, but we aren't. Not only Arsenal pick up the best but smaller clubs have been picking up the next best.

If we can't do that then it's always an uphill battle. We need the best to play the laws of probability. It's not enough to sign up the best in the old Shirley league which I think is now the Tandridge 'A' league and the best in the few borough teams around us, and I bet they're shared between the usual suspects. We should start having a more proactive and, dare I say it, a more aggressive recruiting policy like Southampton. It's what Man Utd did before they recruited 'the class of 92.' I'm not saying that can be done again in the premier league today, but it could give us an edge over the bottom half and save and make a lot of money at some point in time.

If Parish is reading this then it is something that could do with addressing. But I guess we need category A status first as a selling point when a scout speaks to kid, parents and his coach after the match they've been watched in.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (28 Jun 2017 10.20pm)


Yeah, some good points there. I reckon there is room for us between Arsenal and the smaller clubs though. If we could develop a state of the art academy and also demonstrate that we are willing to give young players a real chance in our matchday squads, no reason we couldn't start nicking some of them from under Arsenal's nose. I'd really like to see us fighting for some of the best young players about in the Championship and League 1 as well, the rise of Alli has shown how rewarding that can be.

As an aside, I read a fairly interesting article earlier about how even Real Madrid are largely abandoning the Galacticos era to concentrate on young players now...

[Link]

 


We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Canterbury Palace's Profile Canterbury Palace Flag Whitstable 28 Jun 17 10.49pm Send a Private Message to Canterbury Palace Add Canterbury Palace as a friend

Originally posted by Painter

It's a romantic idea, that we put youngsters in the first team, but in reality it ain't going to happen. It doesn't matter how good the academy is, it's just to bigger jump in standard. The only possible way they can ever get in the first team now is by going on loan in the lower leagues and impressing against older players, not other youngsters.
Look at England U23s, outclassed by the Germans who had 40 shots on goal, these were the top U23s we have and hardly any play in their clubs first team regularly.


Don't forget that we have several players who qualified to play in that tournament but are now attached to the senior side. We could have put out a stronger 11 and we've actually performed better overall than anyone in youth football this summer.

There are plenty of young players who have been bought or promoted to the first teams of bigger clubs than us in the league; Rashford, Davies, Pickford, Sterling, Alli, Kane and have performed admirably. We might not have these types of players in our academy at the moment but with the right investment and management I don't see why we shouldn't in the future. If we produce a single one and flog them to City for £30 million after a season then it pays for itself.

Edited by Canterbury Palace (28 Jun 2017 10.52pm)

 


We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HeathMan's Profile HeathMan Flag Purley 28 Jun 17 11.26pm Send a Private Message to HeathMan Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add HeathMan as a friend

Two considerations

Staying in PL this season

Being in PL in five years' time.

As many have said players who might break through can be regarded as poor against first team players. I am looking forward to going home after seeing introductions without worries - who can freely express themselves. Three up at 65 minutes is a suitable indication for a youngster to come on, and impress.

COYP

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rossboss29's Profile rossboss29 Flag Portsmouth 29 Jun 17 9.02am Send a Private Message to rossboss29 Add rossboss29 as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace

When in the Championship, within a few years of one another we produced Watson, Soares, Borrowdale, Wilf, Clyne, Moses, Williams and Bostock and at that stage our academy was being talked about as being one of the most productive in the country. However, with the benefit of hindsight, it's only really Zaha, Moses and Clyne who have done anything of note (Watson to a lesser degree). Is that enough over a ten year period for a club with relatively little competition in South East London? Not so sure.

Would be extremely happy if we invested heavily in the academy, as fun as marquee signings are, the fans will always take a local player to heart.

I would say anyone who plays in the premier league regularly (injury permitting) has made it. And Watson scored the winner in the fa cup final.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Painter's Profile Painter Flag Croydon 29 Jun 17 9.18am Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace


Don't forget that we have several players who qualified to play in that tournament but are now attached to the senior side. We could have put out a stronger 11 and we've actually performed better overall than anyone in youth football this summer.

There are plenty of young players who have been bought or promoted to the first teams of bigger clubs than us in the league; Rashford, Davies, Pickford, Sterling, Alli, Kane and have performed admirably. We might not have these types of players in our academy at the moment but with the right investment and management I don't see why we shouldn't in the future. If we produce a single one and flog them to City for £30 million after a season then it pays for itself.

Edited by Canterbury Palace (28 Jun 2017 10.52pm)

That's only 6 players you have named, 4 of which didn't play in U23 tournament, Spain has all its best U23s playing. We just don't take youngsters seriously.
What's the point of us investing time and money to produce a player then sell them for £30m if we're lucky. How does that help the team?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Great Academy or a neglected one