Calum Chambers (Sensible option)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Dan89  Se25 25 Jul 17 8.24am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Well that's not as bad as £25m. Meanwhile the bin dippers are sticking to their guns. Well need to strengthen other areas, I think the hold up is due to a buy back clause.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Goldfiinger Just down the road 25 Jul 17 10.56am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
Well need to strengthen other areas, I think the hold up is due to a buy back clause. Buy back clause ?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 25 Jul 17 11.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Goldfiinger
Buy back clause ? Yeah similar to iheanacho deal, Arsenal want to insert a buy back clause at around 28m. If he becomes a England player in that time. He'd be worth nearly double that.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  25 Jul 17 12.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
Yeah similar to iheanacho deal, Arsenal want to insert a buy back clause at around 28m. If he becomes a England player in that time. He'd be worth nearly double that. At the present rate of transfer fee inflation a year from now £28m might be about enough for a saveloy and a bag of chips.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Xong Kudu 25 Jul 17 12.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The problem today is that clubs in-house solicitors are pushing their luck even more with smart arse clauses which in reality aren't smart at all and just stifle the market and encourage other clubs to impose copy cat clauses. (So none benefits) We should put two fingers up to this £28m nonsense buy-back clause and on a different matter also tell Liverpool to whistle dickie for their over-valuation of a good but injured player.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Goldfiinger Just down the road 25 Jul 17 12.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
Yeah similar to iheanacho deal, Arsenal want to insert a buy back clause at around 28m. If he becomes a England player in that time. He'd be worth nearly double that. At £15m maybe they could have a buy back clause but not anything north of that. Otherwise the risk is all ours. Where did you hear about this buy back clause for Chambers ?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 25 Jul 17 12.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Goldfiinger
Twitter probably
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 25 Jul 17 1.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
@chrisPalace
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Xong Kudu 25 Jul 17 1.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
There should transfer protocol between certain clubs who want to do business within a straight forward framework including if you want to sell a player agree a price, sell him and move on the god's sake. Sometimes you'll win sometimes you'll lose. I can see contracts getting more & more tangled in future to everyone's detriment except of course legal advisors who have vested interests to make things messy and justify their salaries/fees.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 25 Jul 17 1.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Twitter probably No willo sources, yeah it on twitter.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Petereagle Brockley 25 Jul 17 1.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dan89
No willo sources, yeah it on twitter. If it turns out to be £18m that would I think be good business for Palace, given that Arsenal paid £16m for him. ....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Xong Kudu 25 Jul 17 1.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Let's just get it over the line. He's a good player.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.