Bournemouth

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

bodge 02 Jul 17 1.05pm
Originally posted by Direwolf Seem to have got a flying start in the transfer window. Defoe, Begovic and now Nathan Ake. Would have welcomed any of those three. If its true a three year deal for Defoe is good for Defoe not many players of his age would get that.
Alert a moderator to this post

bodge

02 Jul 17 1.05pm

Originally posted by Direwolf

Seem to have got a flying start in the transfer window. Defoe, Begovic and now Nathan Ake. Would have welcomed any of those three.

If its true a three year deal for Defoe is good for Defoe not many players of his age would get that.

Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave Barnehurst 03 Jul 17 8.12am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle Well I do. I think that all clubs that flaunt the FFP rules should have to refer all future incoming transfers to the governing body who would refuse to register the player unless the club could prove that they were keeping within the FFP guidelines I agree. If the penalties are less than the benefits of breaching FFP rules, then the penalties need to be more severe. We have Parish curtailing our transfer activities so that we don't breach FFP, but it's OK for Bournemouth to do so for some reason. Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave

Barnehurst 03 Jul 17 8.12am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Well I do.

I think that all clubs that flaunt the FFP rules should have to refer all future incoming transfers to the governing body who would refuse to register the player unless the club could prove that they were keeping within the FFP guidelines

I agree. If the penalties are less than the benefits of breaching FFP rules, then the penalties need to be more severe.

We have Parish curtailing our transfer activities so that we don't breach FFP, but it's OK for Bournemouth to do so for some reason.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert a moderator to this post

iheartcpfc SE25 14 Jul 17 10.24pm
Originally posted by bexleydave Plucky little Bournemouth, the FFP bandits. Don't you just love the media darlings. Especially that Howe with his instructing his team to take turns to kick the s*** out of flair players until they snap and get booked while avoiding cards themselves.
Alert a moderator to this post

iheartcpfc

SE25 14 Jul 17 10.24pm

Originally posted by bexleydave

Plucky little Bournemouth, the FFP bandits.

Don't you just love the media darlings. Especially that Howe with his instructing his team to take turns to kick the s*** out of flair players until they snap and get booked while avoiding cards themselves.

Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol 16 Jul 17 4.27am
FFP rules need to be reviewed, small clubs should be allowed to be aspirational, the premiership should not be a closed shop, the bigger the gaps are the worse for football all round Paua oouaaranc� Ir� chiyeah Ish� gal� ma ba oo ah
Alert a moderator to this post

Pussay Patrol

16 Jul 17 4.27am

FFP rules need to be reviewed, small clubs should be allowed to be aspirational, the premiership should not be a closed shop, the bigger the gaps are the worse for football all round

Paua oouaaranc� Ir� chiyeah Ish� gal� ma ba oo ah

Alert a moderator to this post

Face in Wetherspoons 16 Jul 17 8.37am
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol FFP rules need to be reviewed, small clubs should be allowed to be aspirational, the premiership should not be a closed shop, the bigger the gaps are the worse for football all round Very good point.
Alert a moderator to this post

Face in Wetherspoons

16 Jul 17 8.37am

Send a Private Message to Face in Wetherspoons

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

FFP rules need to be reviewed, small clubs should be allowed to be aspirational, the premiership should not be a closed shop, the bigger the gaps are the worse for football all round

Very good point.

Alert a moderator to this post

MKCPFC Spain/MK 16 Jul 17 11.07am
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol FFP rules need to be reviewed, small clubs should be allowed to be aspirational, the premiership should not be a closed shop, the bigger the gaps are the worse for football all round Spot on , it favours the big clubs who can spend as much as they like really , and pay the fine if they do breach the rules. It is a pointless rule unless
Alert a moderator to this post

MKCPFC

Spain/MK 16 Jul 17 11.07am

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

FFP rules need to be reviewed, small clubs should be allowed to be aspirational, the premiership should not be a closed shop, the bigger the gaps are the worse for football all round

Spot on , it favours the big clubs who can spend as much as they like really , and pay the fine if they do breach the rules. It is a pointless rule unless

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Bournemouth

Site Map

Sponsors