Sell Jimmy Mac, he ain't coming back
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Willo  South coast - west of Brighton. 03 Jul 17 10.26am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
Can't agree that it was a good move to lose Jedinak. We absolutely could have done with him during our awful run. It was short sighted and we nearly paid the price we had absolutely no steel in midfield and he wasn't adequately replaced until January. If that's your model for a good bit of business I say we keep him. Hughes hasn't played PL football he is as much of a risk as anyone else who isn't a proven quantity. Teams would also be able to hold us to ransom if we sold McArthur because they would know we would be short in the middle and would have to pay up. Jedinak was a fading force in the PL and not the Jedinak of old.We got £4 Mill for him and of course we got in Luka who was just what we needed.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Pierre  Purley 03 Jul 17 10.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Jedinak was a fading force in the PL and not the Jedinak of old.We got £4 Mill for him and of course we got in Luka who was just what we needed. Jedinak may have been slightly on the wane and yes we did get £4m for him.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 03 Jul 17 10.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
Can't agree that it was a good move to lose Jedinak. We absolutely could have done with him during our awful run. It was short sighted and we nearly paid the price we had absolutely no steel in midfield and he wasn't adequately replaced until January. If that's your model for a good bit of business I say we keep him. Hughes hasn't played PL football he is as much of a risk as anyone else who isn't a proven quantity. Teams would also be able to hold us to ransom if we sold McArthur because they would know we would be short in the middle and would have to pay up. Jedinak was good business. The fact that we didn't replace him until January lies the problem. I'd sell mcarthur and dann. If we bought in sufficient replacements. Then there's no big drama. If we bought in another midfield ideally we want better than what we got. Mcarthur has 12 months left and if villa offered us anything above the 8m we spend a couple of seasons ago. We'd be foolish not sell. Fans talk about going to the next level. Imagine we bought in 2 midfielders Ziyech and yann m'villa for example . Where would this mcarthur, I'd say surplus to requirements.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| alaneagle1 Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 03 Jul 17 10.49am |
|
|---|---|
|
Dan what's the "next level " for you.?
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 03 Jul 17 10.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by alaneagle1
Dan what's the "next level " for you.? Establishing top 10 finish and potential push for europa league places.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 03 Jul 17 11.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
The problem lies with puncheon. Personally he should leave before mcarthur but due to him being well loved by the chairman and fans. Extremely unlikely to leave and contribution of 0 goals from midfield is disgusting. Therefore if 2 midfielder are bought in then mcarthur may have to leave.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dreamwaverider London 03 Jul 17 11.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
What would he fetch ? £7....£8......mil??
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 03 Jul 17 11.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
What would he fetch ? £7....£8......mil?? In an inflated market maybe 10m . With villa still having parachute payments.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Aray South London 03 Jul 17 11.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
didn't realise he's only got 1 year on his contract. if we should either extend it or sell him. business is business.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| si_1967 Surrey 03 Jul 17 11.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pierre
Jedinak may have been slightly on the wane and yes we did get £4m for him. I agree with all this except for the one point - highlighted. I think you'll find most people (except Pardew) were arguing for a decent replacement last August rather than hindsight and we got ... Flamini, who never played!!
... what |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan89 Se25 03 Jul 17 5.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Imagine selling mcarthur to bring in hernadez who was a 13m release clause to leave Bayern Leverkusen.
Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 03 Jul 17 5.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Jedinak was a fading force in the PL and not the Jedinak of old.We got £4 Mill for him and of course we got in Luka who was just what we needed. Yep, Jedi, much as I loved him, was going to have to be replaced. An Luka is exactly the player to do that - same kind of steel, more skill and more talent. The only problem was probably the three months of so between selling Jedi and bringing in Luka. We lacked a good defensive midfielder and it probably cost Pardew his job (I can't imagine the Swansea 5-4 with Jedi or the 3-2 Burnley or 3-3 Hull).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.