You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump
April 23 2024 8.42pm

Bias against Trump

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 338 of 573 < 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 >

 

deleted user Flag 16 Jul 19 2.06pm

Originally posted by sitdownstandup

Whetever people get their information from its difficult to believe its going to be completely unbiased. Writers and readers have their own prejudices and readers generally tend to read writers who support their own views and beliefs. Im sure you realise that anyway.

You're right. Everyone has a different paymaster, even these Youtube personalities. There is always a target audience and it isn't usually 'freethinkers'. Bills to pay. A brand to build. Stuff you suddenly realise you shouldn't say or emphasise because it might offend your core audience. And so on.. Everything with mass of even growing appeal, ends up being something of a by numbers caricature of what it professes to actually be.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 16 Jul 19 2.15pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by sitdownstandup

Whetever people get their information from its difficult to believe its going to be completely unbiased. Writers and readers have their own prejudices and readers generally tend to read writers who support their own views and beliefs. Im sure you realise that anyway.


Many people in life....once they reach adulthood come to realise that 'objective truth is a hazy if almost redundant concept.

That is unless they are religious.....then all that stuff is sort of decided for them depending upon how literal they wish to take it.

But for those who aren't religious missing objective truth as a guiding light means each individual needs to deal with positioning themselves on morality questions....Finding where they exist on a spectrum for life's difficult questions.

Well, those of us who care to consider moral questions that is..... as we know a fair number of people just swan through life without thinking about much at all.

Anyway the morality positions we take and what we consider important will have a direct affect and bias how we interpret information.

I don't think there is a way around that.....there are 'facts' or 'statistics' and then there is interpretations of facts to fit an individual's worldview.

So really it's a battle of worldviews and what is realistic.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jul 2019 2.30pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 16 Jul 19 2.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

No, but if I ran out of bog roll I'd gladly take a copy

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 16 Jul 19 6.59pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by johnno42000

Yes he was a republican but he wasn't the only one to own slaves.

This person has tracked down some republicans who owned slaves

It is daft to think there were no republicans who owned slaves just as much as saying that every democrat owned slaves.

Did they still own them after election to the Republican party and where did I say all dems had slaves.
I said they were the party of slavery as is true and 99% to virtual infinity and they still are.
Look at democrat cities.
No hope
No aspiration
Crap housing
Welfare dependents
Equality for all but all equally poor.

Yet all these people still vote Democrat.
Afraid of change which keeps you happy with your status quo because of no 1 ,2 and 4 above.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View johnno42000's Profile johnno42000 Flag 17 Jul 19 12.38am Send a Private Message to johnno42000 Add johnno42000 as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Did they still own them after election to the Republican party and where did I say all dems had slaves.
I said they were the party of slavery as is true and 99% to virtual infinity and they still are.
Look at democrat cities.
No hope
No aspiration
Crap housing
Welfare dependents
Equality for all but all equally poor.

Yet all these people still vote Democrat.
Afraid of change which keeps you happy with your status quo because of no 1 ,2 and 4 above.

I didn't say you did. What I said was that saying no republicans had slaves is as daft as saying all democrats owned slaves. Both are untrue.

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
deleted user Flag 17 Jul 19 1.14am

I think it shows how badly Trump's comments came across that we need to journey through the annals of time to move the topic on.

Trump would've never told a white American congresswoman holding the exact same views with ancestors from elsewhere to "go back to" their country. The comments were clearly racist. Intentionally so. A calculated gamble and no doubt part of his 2020 re-election strategy. Whereas the democrats reel off the myriad of races they hope will vote for them in numbers, Trump's strategy has always been to make non white Americans appear 'foreign' when needed. See birtherism.


Edited by dollardays (17 Jul 2019 1.47am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 17 Jul 19 5.38am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by johnno42000

I didn't say you did. What I said was that saying no republicans had slaves is as daft as saying all democrats owned slaves. Both are untrue.

I stand corrected (for now) but going forwards that one thing doesnt change what I wrote about Democrats.
They are the party of slavery and are pulling down statues of their own former leaders.
History has bad.
Acceptance and a change of direction would be the biggest compliment and two fingers at the same time.
Not destroying it but learning from it.
Germany still exists because of this.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 17 Jul 19 5.41am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

I think it shows how badly Trump's comments came across that we need to journey through the annals of time to move the topic on.

Trump would've never told a white American congresswoman holding the exact same views with ancestors from elsewhere to "go back to" their country. The comments were clearly racist. Intentionally so. A calculated gamble and no doubt part of his 2020 re-election strategy. Whereas the democrats reel off the myriad of races they hope will vote for them in numbers, Trump's strategy has always been to make non white Americans appear 'foreign' when needed. See birtherism.


Edited by dollardays (17 Jul 2019 1.47am)

I think he would if she pissed over the flag; which is an analogy of what these women did.
If you dont like what you have in life you try your hardest to change it. Not antagonise by ripping apart every shred then accepting everyone to back you up.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 17 Jul 19 8.08am Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

I think he would if she pissed over the flag; which is an analogy of what these women did.
If you dont like what you have in life you try your hardest to change it. Not antagonise by ripping apart every shred then accepting everyone to back you up.

You think he’d tell a white woman to go back where they’re from? Of course he f***ing wouldn’t.

Who do you think knows more about facing adversity and working hard to change it; a white male born into millions or a female born into a working class immigrant family?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 17 Jul 19 8.21am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

You think he’d tell a white woman to go back where they’re from? Of course he f***ing wouldn’t.

Who do you think knows more about facing adversity and working hard to change it; a white male born into millions or a female born into a working class immigrant family?

White people do come from other countries other than the UK and the us.
What if she was say Danish or swedish.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 17 Jul 19 8.22am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

You think he’d tell a white woman to go back where they’re from? Of course he f***ing wouldn’t.

Who do you think knows more about facing adversity and working hard to change it; a white male born into millions or a female born into a working class immigrant family?

White guilt trip then.
Let's be sorry for history.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Jul 19 8.34am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by W12

I do appreciate you taking the time to answer and this seems honest but it really is exactly how i would expect you would answer. It's mainstream media and people that entirely support that narrative. All of those politicians and celebrities you mentioned propose the same globalist and EU centric, eco friendly "if everyone would just be nice we can solve everyone", feminism friendly, self flagellating worldview which you are trapped in. To top it all you are also relying on the hyperbole and disinformation from Twitter.

Do yourself a favour and start with Tim Pool (Youtube and podcasts) for honest and non-partisan commentary and the actual journalism that we are missing. He's a centrist by any reasonable measure and further left than myself but you may learn something that will open your eyes. Even if you don't agree I suspect you might learn to realize that journalism from the mainstream is now almost dead once you are again exposed to the real thing.

At least I can say I tried.

I was similar to you only a couple of years ago by the way.

You asked where I got my information and who I trusted. I don't really trust any broadcast media which doesn't have any editorial control and just allows an individual to pontificate without being challenged. There's plenty available. You have found one you like but if I went that route I would have to use many.

I do use web forums of every stripe. I am a member, for instance, of several Trump groups who either support him or loath him. I have been banned from several too for daring to criticise him. These forums give plenty of insight into the way others think and why but they also allow those views to be challenged and dissected. I belong to groups that want to remain in the EU and some that wish to leave come what may.

So I don't agree that my use of the MSM means my information gathering is flawed at all. In fact I believe the attacks from the right both here and in the USA by Trump with his "enemy of the people" comments about the MSM to be really dangerous. Seeking to undermine our confidence in the MSM and threatening the freedom of the press are first steps towards state thought control and dictatorship. That to me is the biggest danger here. It appears it might have already worked with you. So I balance your encouragement to watch alternative sources with my own to reject this undermining of the free press, where there are lawyers and editors fact checking before publication. You can straighten the spin with your own intelligence, so long as you know what is reported hasn't just been invented.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 338 of 573 < 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump