Sarah Champion

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

hedgehog50 Croydon 17 Aug 17 7.58am
The left posters on here are very quite on this (with the honourable exception of steeleye20) wonder why. We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 17 Aug 17 7.58am

The left posters on here are very quite on this (with the honourable exception of steeleye20) wonder why.

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Aug 17 9.41am
Originally posted by gmostone I think the problem is that she blamed pakistani men, when actually it was Indian, Turkish, Iranian as well... *In my eyes a dirty nonce cnt is a dirty nonce cnt* whatever country they come from. Somebody should've proof read the article and flagged that up, she's a bloody mp giving an interview to a tabloid rag for christs sake! Edited by gmostone (16 Aug 2017 9.24pm) Thanks for clearing that up. Were the majority not pakistani? Would people have preferred it if she had said they were almost entirely Muslim? This is all missing the point, which is that offending a few people seems to be more important than the crime or the victims to some of these lefty idiots.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Aug 17 9.41am

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by gmostone

I think the problem is that she blamed pakistani men, when actually it was Indian, Turkish, Iranian as well...

In my eyes a dirty nonce c*nt is a dirty nonce c*nt whatever country they come from.

Somebody should've proof read the article and flagged that up, she's a bloody mp giving an interview to a tabloid rag for christs sake!

Edited by gmostone (16 Aug 2017 9.24pm)

Thanks for clearing that up.

Were the majority not pakistani? Would people have preferred it if she had said they were almost entirely Muslim?

This is all missing the point, which is that offending a few people seems to be more important than the crime or the victims to some of these lefty idiots.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Aug 17 9.42am
Originally posted by hedgehog50 The left posters on here are very quite on this (with the honourable exception of steeleye20) wonder why. Maybe because they are starting to see the light.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Aug 17 9.42am

Originally posted by hedgehog50

The left posters on here are very quite on this (with the honourable exception of steeleye20) wonder why.

Maybe because they are starting to see the light.

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 17 Aug 17 2.49pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Maybe because they are starting to see the light. Their silence speaks volumes - but what could they say? We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 17 Aug 17 2.49pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Maybe because they are starting to see the light.

Their silence speaks volumes - but what could they say?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721 Reading 17 Aug 17 3.25pm
She's right, shouldn't have been sacked - the issue requires specific research and investigation. "One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

jamiemartin721

Reading 17 Aug 17 3.25pm

She's right, shouldn't have been sacked - the issue requires specific research and investigation.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 17 Aug 17 3.48pm
Originally posted by jamiemartin721 She's right, shouldn't have been sacked - the issue requires specific research and investigation. What does this tell us about the current Labour party leadership? We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 17 Aug 17 3.48pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

She's right, shouldn't have been sacked - the issue requires specific research and investigation.

What does this tell us about the current Labour party leadership?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Aug 17 3.57pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 What does this tell us about the current Labour party leadership? Nothing we don't already know. They will sacrifice any moral if they think it means a better chance of power.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Aug 17 3.57pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

What does this tell us about the current Labour party leadership?

Nothing we don't already know.

They will sacrifice any moral if they think it means a better chance of power.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 Aug 17 4.04pm
Yep, if you don't nip it in the bud you'll end up tacitly supporting white sumpremacism. Haven't read the story. Will post laterer when I have.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 17 Aug 17 4.04pm

Yep, if you don't nip it in the bud you'll end up tacitly supporting white sumpremacism.

Haven't read the story. Will post laterer when I have.

Alert a moderator to this post

nobody sussex 17 Aug 17 4.18pm
Or hen you find some left wing article that might deflect from your embarrassment over the issue
Alert a moderator to this post

nobody

sussex 17 Aug 17 4.18pm

Or hen you find some left wing article that might deflect from your embarrassment over the issue

Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50 Croydon 17 Aug 17 4.18pm
Originally posted by nickgusset Yep, if you don't nip it in the bud you'll end up tacitly supporting white sumpremacism. Haven't read the story. Will post laterer when I have. Unlike nipping the grooming and raping of children in the bud you mean? We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 17 Aug 17 4.18pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Yep, if you don't nip it in the bud you'll end up tacitly supporting white sumpremacism.

Haven't read the story. Will post laterer when I have.

Unlike nipping the grooming and raping of children in the bud you mean?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 17 Aug 17 4.41pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 Unlike nipping the grooming and raping of children in the bud you mean? Yeah, it's all those pakistani men doing it. Every single pakistani man will be looked upon differentmy now. I understand what Sarah Champion meant and it's a valid argument. However, whether it was a poor way of phrasing or the Sun stitching her up or both, the message has come across poorly. Added to the fact that it meant the Sun was emboldened enough to cite Champion when using the phrase, 'the Muslim problem in an editorial. It's almost like they're seeing what they can get away with.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 17 Aug 17 4.41pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Unlike nipping the grooming and raping of children in the bud you mean?

Yeah, it's all those pakistani men doing it. Every single pakistani man will be looked upon differentmy now.

I understand what Sarah Champion meant and it's a valid argument. However, whether it was a poor way of phrasing or the Sun stitching her up or both, the message has come across poorly. Added to the fact that it meant the Sun was emboldened enough to cite Champion when using the phrase, 'the Muslim problem in an editorial. It's almost like they're seeing what they can get away with.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 17 Aug 17 4.55pm
Originally posted by nickgusset Yeah, it's all those pakistani men doing it. Every single pakistani man will be looked upon differentmy now. I understand what Sarah Champion meant and it's a valid argument. However, whether it was a poor way of phrasing or the Sun stitching her up or both, the message has come across poorly. Added to the fact that it meant the Sun was emboldened enough to cite Champion when using the phrase, 'the Muslim problem in an editorial. It's almost like they're seeing what they can get away with. Yep. Because that is way more important than young white girls being raped unchallenged. Seek help.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

17 Aug 17 4.55pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Yeah, it's all those pakistani men doing it. Every single pakistani man will be looked upon differentmy now.

I understand what Sarah Champion meant and it's a valid argument. However, whether it was a poor way of phrasing or the Sun stitching her up or both, the message has come across poorly. Added to the fact that it meant the Sun was emboldened enough to cite Champion when using the phrase, 'the Muslim problem in an editorial. It's almost like they're seeing what they can get away with.

Yep. Because that is way more important than young white girls being raped unchallenged.

Seek help.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Sarah Champion

Site Map

Sponsors