Connor Wickham injury
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Rudi Hedman  Caterham 01 Sep 17 12.21pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Loz83
Im being ironic, he's useless! Pretty aware of that, mate.
COYP |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Loz83 Crawley 01 Sep 17 12.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Pretty aware of that, mate. Ok, I don't understand 1st your comment then.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| slubglurge welling 02 Sep 17 2.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Wickham is not a quick healer. You can mostly add 50% to his recovery time than most other players. I know this particular injury is serious but i doubt we will see him before the spring if at all. Hes another Remy
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bangell Oxford 02 Sep 17 2.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
He's in the 25 (24) man squad, so I assume there's at least a slight chance he'll be back before the new year.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
BelfastEagle  02 Sep 17 2.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
There is no chance he will play this year, but as we don't have 25 players anyway there is nothing to be gained from not naming him.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mad4palace 02 Sep 17 2.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Why is he in the squad if he's not going to be back before January? You don't have to name a player in the 25 if he's got a long term injury or so I thought. I can only assume they think he might be back before the turn of the year, otherwise he's taking up a spot where we could have added another goalkeeper.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eagleder1 02 Sep 17 2.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It may have escaped your attention but we are short of at least a striker and a goalkeeper so if he is knackered and can't play this year its senseless to include him and take a place which could be occupied by a one or the other. there again its Palace logic!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
coulsdoneagle  London 02 Sep 17 2.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
You can't not name players and keep spaces for free agents. That's why we named Mutch and Wickham etc. If you have pros over 21 on the books then you have to name 25 and can only keep spaces for frees if you don't have 25 on the books. That's why it's gutting that Mutch didn't go out on loan. That would have given us another space rather than leaving us with that lazy talentless knob.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Asian Eagle  Cebu City 02 Sep 17 2.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
That guy is made out of glass, so we better get rid of him asap.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bangell Oxford 02 Sep 17 2.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
You can't not name players and keep spaces for free agents. That's why we named Mutch and Wickham etc. If you have pros over 21 on the books then you have to name 25 and can only keep spaces for frees if you don't have 25 on the books. That's why it's gutting that Mutch didn't go out on loan. That would have given us another space rather than leaving us with that lazy talentless knob. Hmm, I was unaware of that. Hopefully one more striker on a free will give the squad enough depth to last until January (and let's hope we're already looking for deals to line up ahead of time).
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Pigglelet Deepest Darkest Sussex 02 Sep 17 2.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bangell
Hmm, I was unaware of that. Hopefully one more striker on a free will give the squad enough depth to last until January (and let's hope we're already looking for deals to line up ahead of time). Yes, I wouldn't put too reliance on that.
"Better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 02 Sep 17 2.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
You can't not name players and keep spaces for free agents. That's why we named Mutch and Wickham etc. If you have pros over 21 on the books then you have to name 25 and can only keep spaces for frees if you don't have 25 on the books. That's why it's gutting that Mutch didn't go out on loan. That would have given us another space rather than leaving us with that lazy talentless knob. Neither was I aware of that. Is that definitely the rule? Can we loan in a goalkeeper if we're down to one? Or do we have to rely on younger keepers to play premier league football if the last one (of two) gets injured?
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.