New rule - May explain lack of recruitment ?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Username  Horsham 07 Sep 17 7.18pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tommyp151211
Yep this is correct . We had 24 registered plus Flamini as a free agent at the start of the season. in January Papa and Wickham were left out because of justifiable long term injury. Mutch went to Reading. Something happened to Appiah. And we got 4 in. However, like i said previously it would be practically impossible to leave out a fit over 21 first team player' from the squad. Financially, we couldn't justify that. Half a season is a long time as well. Even if it wasn't the rule, then I don't see why we wouldn't name Mutch if he is going to be here anyway. He's not done well, but in a real injury crisis he could still be needed.
Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Tommyp151211 07 Sep 17 8.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Username
Half a season is a long time as well. Even if it wasn't the rule, then I don't see why we wouldn't name Mutch if he is going to be here anyway. He's not done well, but in a real injury crisis he could still be needed.
You can't just play Football Manager like some of the suggestions have been. it's unsustainable and completely stupid.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.