Striker are we gonna sign one or not?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Zaha Oh Yes  Epsom 09 Sep 17 11.18pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Obviously the window shut but the words from the young goalie released was that a free agent was coming in next few days. Anyone heard of any potential new arrivals. I would of thought we explored the diabate option? Anyone know anymore news I'd be grateful. Thanks
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 09 Sep 17 11.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
There will be scouts out on Sunday. Polish your boots with Dubbin and think what you want to do with your first touch before it comes to you.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MonsterMunch Cambridge 10 Sep 17 11.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Did you honestly think it was going to go any other way?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 10 Sep 17 11.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
You *would have* thought.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 10 Sep 17 12.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I had a bit of a conspiracy theory about this. What would stop us from releasing our 3rd goalkeeper, but pay him until January, keep him training etc. Also signing a striker, paying him until January, keeping him training etc. also; and then waiting until we see what unfolds before declaring either as our 25th man? I am not saying that this is what we have done, but if it is within the rules, then it would seem to me to be a way of keeping that 25th spot open for either a 3rd goalkeeper or a reserve striker. Obviously we would have to declare our hand at the point when either was actually needed to play.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Eagleder1 10 Sep 17 3.36pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Interesting theory and sounds clever. Too clever for Palace though! We will just sit and consider making a move for this and that until too late. The fact we had to play Lee today from the start tells all how desperate we are. There are no variations or alternatives worthy when we pick up injuries. It's really not that hard but there you go ( eh Chris Holmesdale radio! You just hate reality)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
viveasheagle  perth 11 Sep 17 12.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The lack of a back up striker has been a recruiting disaster and is already costing us. Benteke offers a particular threat but the need for a pacey striker as a back up / alternative is so apparent.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bexleydave Barnehurst 11 Sep 17 1.14pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dp
I had a bit of a conspiracy theory about this. What would stop us from releasing our 3rd goalkeeper, but pay him until January, keep him training etc. Also signing a striker, paying him until January, keeping him training etc. also; and then waiting until we see what unfolds before declaring either as our 25th man? I am not saying that this is what we have done, but if it is within the rules, then it would seem to me to be a way of keeping that 25th spot open for either a 3rd goalkeeper or a reserve striker. Obviously we would have to declare our hand at the point when either was actually needed to play. But in the January window we can play who we like as we don't have to name the 25 until the end of the window, so what would be the point? The only point of leaving a space in the squad that I can see is to sign a free agent striker, as cover there is more urgent than GK.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.