Wilf:

Wilf: "I think Frank should've got more time"

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 4 of 4 << First < 1 2 3 4

Mstrobez 22 Sep 17 12.09pm
Originally posted by gmostone Does any of this nonsense you're gibbering away about actually make sense to you? Yes, because I grew up in the area, and I'm 23. Ask any person locally below the age of 25 what Wilf meant in the context of that sentence coinciding with the way he normally speaks and theyll tell you. People are shooting the messenger because they disagree with the actual statement. I literally just posted what he said. Bexleydave doing his usual brown nosing "" when something's said about me. Edited by Mstrobez (22 Sep 2017 12.10pm) We're the Arthur over ere!
Alert a moderator to this post

Mstrobez

22 Sep 17 12.09pm

Originally posted by gmostone

Does any of this nonsense you're gibbering away about actually make sense to you?

Yes, because I grew up in the area, and I'm 23.

Ask any person locally below the age of 25 what Wilf meant in the context of that sentence coinciding with the way he normally speaks and theyll tell you.

People are shooting the messenger because they disagree with the actual statement. I literally just posted what he said. Bexleydave doing his usual brown nosing "" when something's said about me.

Edited by Mstrobez (22 Sep 2017 12.10pm)

We're the Arthur over ere!

Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider London 22 Sep 17 12.13pm
Whatever dialect you want to interpret Zaha quote from (not losing sight of the fact his mother tongue is French) in my view it was a very diplomatic statement to keep everyone happy. Im not convinced he was in love with the new style. His mannerisms on the pitch certainly didn't show it. But the guy seems a pretty chilled ambassador in interviews. Don't read too much into it. It is what it is and its done. Rien de plus.
Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider

London 22 Sep 17 12.13pm

Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider

Whatever dialect you want to interpret Zaha quote from (not losing sight of the fact his mother tongue is French) in my view it was a very diplomatic statement to keep everyone happy.
Im not convinced he was in love with the new style. His mannerisms on the pitch certainly didn't show it.
But the guy seems a pretty chilled ambassador in interviews.
Don't read too much into it. It is what it is and its done.
Rien de plus.

Alert a moderator to this post

Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 22 Sep 17 1.09pm
Originally posted by MKCPFC Roy did as Frank should have done , he started with the same team that everyone thought did well at Burnley (one change that was obvious had to be done) , and let them have a go and watched them. Now he will start to make whatever changes he thinks will improve the team. If only Frank had done that against Huddersfield in first match(He could have played the same team that beat Hull) , he might have looked competent and might still be in the job. Roy was definitely pragmatic (in a good way) v saints. I just think there was something radical about de Boer's whole approach (for better or worse) that meant Roy was always going to struggle to continue with it. he came in on Wednesday and was either sitting and watching how we worked, or changing everything. neither was going to dramatically improve our odds of winning that match. there was a chance that de Boer got us a win with a commanding performance like the one up at Burnley. and if that had happened, it would have been appropriate to persist with him through 3 horrible games, after which the decision to sack him would have been all the more apparent and outwardly fair (which is fairly important for subsequent recruitment). it's water under the bridge now, and I take on board the point it wasn't only about the football. but I do think we've had a terrific amount of disparaging spin about de Boer coming out of the club. de Boer himself has largely kept quiet. If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.
Alert a moderator to this post

Ginger Pubic Wig

Wickham de L'Ouest 22 Sep 17 1.09pm

Send a Private Message to Ginger Pubic Wig

Originally posted by MKCPFC

Roy did as Frank should have done , he started with the same team that everyone thought did well at Burnley (one change that was obvious had to be done) , and let them have a go and watched them. Now he will start to make whatever changes he thinks will improve the team.
If only Frank had done that against Huddersfield in first match(He could have played the same team that beat Hull) , he might have looked competent and might still be in the job.

Roy was definitely pragmatic (in a good way) v saints. I just think there was something radical about de Boer's whole approach (for better or worse) that meant Roy was always going to struggle to continue with it. he came in on Wednesday and was either sitting and watching how we worked, or changing everything. neither was going to dramatically improve our odds of winning that match.

there was a chance that de Boer got us a win with a commanding performance like the one up at Burnley. and if that had happened, it would have been appropriate to persist with him through 3 horrible games, after which the decision to sack him would have been all the more apparent and outwardly fair (which is fairly important for subsequent recruitment).

it's water under the bridge now, and I take on board the point it wasn't only about the football. but I do think we've had a terrific amount of disparaging spin about de Boer coming out of the club. de Boer himself has largely kept quiet.

If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.

Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle 22 Sep 17 1.17pm
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig it's water under the bridge now, and I take on board the point it wasn't only about the football. but I do think we've had a terrific amount of disparaging spin about de Boer coming out of the club. de Boer himself has largely kept quiet. Interesting point that. When the club is looking for a new manager or players absolutely nothing leaks out of the club but when something happens that the media and fans feel shows the club and it's chairman in a poor light it becomes leakier than a colander. Personally I view it exactly the same as when friends separate and divorce as you hear both sides of the story yet they are completely different with neither being the whole truth.
Alert a moderator to this post

Midlands Eagle

22 Sep 17 1.17pm

Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig

it's water under the bridge now, and I take on board the point it wasn't only about the football. but I do think we've had a terrific amount of disparaging spin about de Boer coming out of the club. de Boer himself has largely kept quiet.

Interesting point that. When the club is looking for a new manager or players absolutely nothing leaks out of the club but when something happens that the media and fans feel shows the club and it's chairman in a poor light it becomes leakier than a colander.

Personally I view it exactly the same as when friends separate and divorce as you hear both sides of the story yet they are completely different with neither being the whole truth.

Alert a moderator to this post

Qwijibo Bournemouth 22 Sep 17 4.18pm
Originally posted by Painter Pointless thread. It doesn't matter what any player may of said, de Boer is gone and he isn't coming back. That's what they said about Dave Bassett
Alert a moderator to this post

Qwijibo

Bournemouth 22 Sep 17 4.18pm

Originally posted by Painter

Pointless thread.

It doesn't matter what any player may of said, de Boer is gone and he isn't coming back.

That's what they said about Dave Bassett

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 4 << First < 1 2 3 4

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Wilf: "I think Frank should've got more time"

Site Map

Sponsors