Had enough- protest against chelsea.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 8 of 8 << First < 4 5 6 7 8

wordup 05 Oct 17 8.17pm
Originally posted by black eagle. Yeah a protest is gonna really help the boys isn't it. Why not try and support the team instead. Agreed, let's show a bit of unity.
Alert a moderator to this post

wordup

05 Oct 17 8.17pm

Originally posted by black eagle.

Yeah a protest is gonna really help the boys isn't it.

Why not try and support the team instead.

Agreed, let's show a bit of unity.

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 05 Oct 17 9.02pm
Originally posted by wordup Agreed, let's show a bit of unity. If anyone bothers like the last xx months, yeah. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 05 Oct 17 9.02pm

Originally posted by wordup

Agreed, let's show a bit of unity.

If anyone bothers like the last xx months, yeah.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

cjd The garden of England 06 Oct 17 5.00pm
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman I thought he was great until he extended Pardews contract. But I don't have to adore the owner(s). If I see something avoidable I'll say so, not offer to do his chores and let him rest his laboutins on my back after 3 months holidaying because instead of a bit of over the shoulder pressure, fvcking Skype's always an option. Is that what large businesses do when there's serious concerns now? Fire up Skype? Since Pardew's extension it's been a car crash with some specific errors made not once, but twice. That's why we're p1ssed with this. 1 player in a specialist area of the pitch is not new. Trying to change strategy after just escaping the drop and poor form and morale isn't new either. Neither is writing off the first 3 league games, which this season could roll into 8 or 11 looking at Benteke's availability. Yes I'm aware my �3 mil could've gone in. So could've club money preventing repeats of the above. As the saying goes "opinions are like a$$holes, everybody's got one" but you are different, your just an ....!!
Alert a moderator to this post

cjd

The garden of England 06 Oct 17 5.00pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

I thought he was great until he extended Pardews contract. But I don't have to adore the owner(s). If I see something avoidable I'll say so, not offer to do his chores and let him rest his laboutins on my back after 3 months holidaying because instead of a bit of over the shoulder pressure, fvcking Skype's always an option. Is that what large businesses do when there's serious concerns now? Fire up Skype?

Since Pardew's extension it's been a car crash with some specific errors made not once, but twice. That's why we're p1ssed with this. 1 player in a specialist area of the pitch is not new. Trying to change strategy after just escaping the drop and poor form and morale isn't new either. Neither is writing off the first 3 league games, which this season could roll into 8 or 11 looking at Benteke's availability.

Yes I'm aware my �3 mil could've gone in. So could've club money preventing repeats of the above.

As the saying goes "opinions are like a$$holes, everybody's got one" but you are different, your just an ....!!

Alert a moderator to this post

est1905 06 Oct 17 5.07pm
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman 'Expecting' more than 1 striker to pick from with the money fed to each club isn't being spoilt. 'Expecting' a logical manager choice and choice of football direction bearing in mind results that had just happened and the last time we tried less change after similar results had just happened is not being spoilt. Do I think we should protest? No. Do I think it's best Parish leaves? No. Do I think it's best he doesn't make football decisions? Yes. Do I think the leader he should do is listen to and act on virtually all the advice the football people give him? Yes. Is Freedman that person? Maybe in the championship. Higher? I'm not that impressed he was here about 10 days and there was no impression made on Parish that we should get a striker. If there was, it wasn't enough, and therein lies the problem with ex Palace men. Parish doesn't like to be told what doesn't fit with what he wants to prioritise. [/quote]I very much agree with this. I don't think its in Palaces best interests for Parish to leave but I am angry at him for us being in this current situation and yes it is 100% down to him. The buck stops with the boss, always but particularly when its his decisions that have got us here. I'd like him to take some responsibility for his mistakes and yes, an assurance that he has learned from them and is desperate to atone wouldn't be unwelcome either. He does need to look at obtaining top advise when running the football side and Freedman has shown little to no signs of being that man. I'd offer a director of football role to Allardyce or someone of his experience. Just sign the cheques and do the Talksport interviews Mr Parish. Let the experts run the club.
Alert a moderator to this post

est1905

06 Oct 17 5.07pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

'Expecting' more than 1 striker to pick from with the money fed to each club isn't being spoilt.

'Expecting' a logical manager choice and choice of football direction bearing in mind results that had just happened and the last time we tried less change after similar results had just happened is not being spoilt.

Do I think we should protest? No.

Do I think it's best Parish leaves? No.

Do I think it's best he doesn't make football decisions? Yes.

Do I think the leader he should do is listen to and act on virtually all the advice the football people give him? Yes.

Is Freedman that person? Maybe in the championship. Higher? I'm not that impressed he was here about 10 days and there was no impression made on Parish that we should get a striker. If there was, it wasn't enough, and therein lies the problem with ex Palace men. Parish doesn't like to be told what doesn't fit with what he wants to prioritise. [/quote]I very much agree with this.
I don't think its in Palaces best interests for Parish to leave but I am angry at him for us being in this current situation and yes it is 100% down to him. The buck stops with the boss, always but particularly when its his decisions that have got us here. I'd like him to take some responsibility for his mistakes and yes, an assurance that he has learned from them and is desperate to atone wouldn't be unwelcome either.
He does need to look at obtaining top advise when running the football side and Freedman has shown little to no signs of being that man.
I'd offer a director of football role to Allardyce or someone of his experience.
Just sign the cheques and do the Talksport interviews Mr Parish. Let the experts run the club.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 8 of 8 << First < 4 5 6 7 8

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Had enough- protest against chelsea.

Site Map

Sponsors