What is your point exactly. He was prosecuted in the UK when material found on his PC lead to him being convicted of sex offences. He may well have got away with it with the connivance of the disreputable music industry but a wider conspiracy is unlikely.
After jail he went to Cambodia and Vietnam - why do you think he chose those countries?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Because everyone else in the world works on a capitalist system of exchange. Communism cannot really compete with that, as despite its flaws, its an effective system for objective valuing of limited resources.

In order for communist systems of economics to operate you'd need a LOT of countries engaging in a similar system which may be unrealistic on smaller scales (such as the cost of Cuban Sugar to the Soviet Union).

But Capitalism is an efficient system of exchange, where as communism relies on an inefficient system of exchange (one is arguably fixed to supply and demand systems of exchange the other to system of product produced to need - The Cubans did very well out of the exchange of sugar to the Soviet Union, getting a far better return than they would have gotten on a free market).

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

What like Savile, was it just the music industry turning a blind eye. Was it the disreputable music industry covering up child sex offences in Childrens Homes and in the Catholic Church.

I think we need to be honest, if we're going to claim that other countries are safe havens, or that Islam is a problem with child sex offences - we have to get accept that actually, the UK has its own dark history of turning a blind eye to child rapists.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Pretty much agree with this. Marxist economics of exchange cannot compete with capitalism as a means of exchange, as capitalism understands the concept of scarcity and demand, for rare resources in its model.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Vietnam is a great country and there are neighbourhoods in Saigon which are like being in any "western country", but considerably cheaper. The city centre in Saigon is much like any modern Asian capital with mixes of historic, colonial and modern buildings and sectors and lots of very good restaurants, bars, hotels etc.

Perhaps he went there simply as it is a nice place to live, cheap, hot, good food and he fancied young Asian kids?

Given those countries still have the death penalty and I'd have though the prisons were fairly unpleasant I imagine he knew he was taking a risk and ended up getting arrested and extradited. Can't see what you're moaning about.

For the same reasons I gave above: dealing with the rest of the world which isn't communist, and has a more efficient system for valuation of limited resources.

People tend to think that capitalism is a natural system, it isn't, its a model of system based on surplus and demand for that surplus. Communisms tendency towards collectivisation and production specialisation, contravenes this - producing specific products for exchange in which areas specialise in their production (meaning they only have one or two export goods, but need to import all other products from elsewhere based on exchange).

If you only have one thing to sell, and need to import everything else, it tends to put you on the poor side of supply and demand, as those people trading with you, get to name their price as they can get the same elsewhere (your supply is higher than your demand) - plus you're demand for their products is much higher than their supply (meaning you'll pay more).

Basically, communism creates a sellers market for importers and a buyers market for its own products (which is bad news when you have to do business with foreign countries, even other communist ones).

That's why the Chinese and Vietnamese utilise capitalist economic systems. They need them in order to effectively trade with countries on an more or less even basis. Communism as a system can only work in a 'one nation' ie ideal world - in which the scarcity of resources and the dependency of surplus sale are not factors.

Even Communist countries, when trading with other communist countries tend to look to the best deal they can get (much like Capitalist ones). Its especially problematic for communist countries during the cold war - as capitalist countries could afford to not trade with them, as they had a much greater world market share.

Doesn't matter how many people you have in your country - realistically in a modern age, you have to trade with the outside world for something.

Notably within China, the capacity for capitalism within the country as a means of influence, is much lower than seen in the US (Corporations influence of politics is much lower - whether that's a good or bad thing is another matter - arguably both the Chinese and US political systems represent opposite extremes of corruption in terms of the 'voice of the people').

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]