You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Fundamentalists at it again. ..
April 24 2024 7.24pm

Fundamentalists at it again. ..

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

 

View tome's Profile tome Flag Inner Tantalus Time. 03 Nov 17 9.12pm Send a Private Message to tome Add tome as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I'm not sure anything we say on this football general forum is going to make much of a difference to be honest.

It'll only make a difference to our own sanity, that's for sure.

But I do think it can be one way of changing minds - getting opposing views (at least when the insults stop for a bit). After all, we've seen facebook and other social media tend to group people in such a way they are preaching to the converted quite often. This is one way of getting around that.

The debate would be pretty one sided if we started talking about Millwall though.

 


A one and a two...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 03 Nov 17 9.25pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by tome

It'll only make a difference to our own sanity, that's for sure.

But I do think it can be one way of changing minds - getting opposing views (at least when the insults stop for a bit). After all, we've seen facebook and other social media tend to group people in such a way they are preaching to the converted quite often. This is one way of getting around that.

The debate would be pretty one sided if we started talking about Millwall though.

I suppose there is a catharsis element to it all.

The echo chamber can become a 'safe' space and most ideas should always be open to debate for healthy freedom of speech.

I can't deny I....like Nick...enjoy a bit of back and forth....but that can also be tedious and as has been rightly pointed out to me....it's not much fun as a spectator sport for the boards. It does need to be cut back on I think.

I essentially agree that any political decision that introduces more religion into politics isn't a good thing....well, it's pretty bad.

Is Christianity a threat to secularism?........well as it introduced secularism itself I doubt it's going to make much difference....But having said that, I've never been ok with the mixing of church and state....It's a step back for our most important democracy.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View tome's Profile tome Flag Inner Tantalus Time. 03 Nov 17 9.32pm Send a Private Message to tome Add tome as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I suppose there is a catharsis element to it all.

The echo chamber can become a 'safe' space and most ideas should always be open to debate for healthy freedom of speech.

I can't deny I....like Nick...enjoy a bit of back and forth....but that can also be tedious and as has been rightly pointed out to me....it's not much fun as a spectator sport for the boards. It does need to be cut back on I think.

I essentially agree that any political decision that introduces more religion into politics isn't a good thing....well, it's pretty bad.

Is Christianity a threat to secularism?........well as it introduced secularism itself I doubt it's going to make much difference....But having said that, I've never been ok with the mixing of church and state....It's a step back for our most important democracy.

Yeah, I am not comfortable with the concept of 'safe spaces' but I guess some individuals needs encouragement to talk about their views where previously they have been intimidated. But in universities, public boards and so on all ideas should be up for discussion and assumptions speared.

But I reckon it goes both ways - some are reticent, others belicose - and there needs to be a mid-way point between the two for reasonable doubt and challenge.

Question is, how do you deal with zealots like Pruitt?

 


A one and a two...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 03 Nov 17 9.44pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by tome

Yeah, I am not comfortable with the concept of 'safe spaces' but I guess some individuals needs encouragement to talk about their views where previously they have been intimidated. But in universities, public boards and so on all ideas should be up for discussion and assumptions speared.

But I reckon it goes both ways - some are reticent, others belicose - and there needs to be a mid-way point between the two for reasonable doubt and challenge.

Question is, how do you deal with zealots like Pruitt?

I think you win the next election.

I think this is Trump throwing red meat to supporters. He's famously not religious but he knows what side his bread is buttered.

America is so polarised and at such loggerheads with each other the Democrats need a calm leader who engages with civility....I think that works against Trump with floating voters....Clinton tried but she was too establishment.

If Sanders gets the gig....will he be too old? If he gets the gig it will be interesting.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 03 Nov 17 9.46pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

What? The point I made is pathetic? Why? What do you mean by 'flat out how I see it'?

No hedgehog.
I was agreeing about other religions not getting mentioned.
On nicks thread he started titled pathetic
I wrote about Islam.
I was agreeing with your point.
Flat out agreeing that's what i meant.
This might turn bad for me as I was accused of a***e licking midland the other day.......
For correcting myself.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 03 Nov 17 9.48pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Page 5 hedgehog

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Nov 17 9.51pm

Originally posted by cryrst

No hedgehog.
I was agreeing about other religions not getting mentioned.
On nicks thread he started titled pathetic
I wrote about Islam.
I was agreeing with your point.
Flat out agreeing that's what i meant.
This might turn bad for me as I was accused of a***e licking midland the other day.......
For correcting myself.

My apologies, I hadn't read your other post on the 'pathetic' thread.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 03 Nov 17 9.53pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

My apologies, I hadn't read your other post on the 'pathetic' thread.

Cool I'm thick skinned and not as thespianistic as some learned fellows on here.
If that's even a word.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Nov 17 10.21pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

I have a pro west stance. That's why I want all the s***tery rooted out. You don't do that by staying quiet.

100% agree. We need to route out ALL religious nuttery.
In politics and anywhere where it can be harmful.

It's a pity we are also importing so much of it don't you think?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 03 Nov 17 10.32pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

100% agree. We need to route out ALL religious nuttery.
In politics and anywhere where it can be harmful.

It's a pity we are also importing so much of it don't you think?

All those new churches everywhere. Spreading peace and love.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 03 Nov 17 10.36pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

All those new churches everywhere. Spreading peace and love.

If only...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View tome's Profile tome Flag Inner Tantalus Time. 03 Nov 17 11.22pm Send a Private Message to tome Add tome as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

100% agree. We need to route out ALL religious nuttery.
In politics and anywhere where it can be harmful.

It's a pity we are also importing so much of it don't you think?

How much do you think we import versus is developed after they arrive?

A few nutters are born (the chronically psychopathic perhaps) but I think most are nurtured. Not sure how you stop it being nurtured though. Stigmatising people seems to have the opposite affect but I'm not sure how you get isolated / fearful people (of whatever stripe) to engage constructively. Come across some ideas in education, but the system is so in hock to exams there's little room or resource for other things.

 


A one and a two...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Fundamentalists at it again. ..