You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Budget 2017
April 26 2024 12.47am

The Budget 2017

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 13 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

 

View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 22 Nov 17 2.49pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

How can the government possibly hope to over take the housing problem and increase wages and improve the NHS with 300k new people coming here every year?

It makes no sense at all.

At least the national debt is under control.

The housing problem is not a Tory nor Labour problem as it has been caused by both. No government can be expected to fix this within their term as it is a generational issue that will take probably three or four terms of committed action.

However, this government or indeed any government should take responsibility for building houses far beyond the rate of people coming here......that has been a criminal policy by previous governments......instead it's been economies in part backed on housing prices.....no brainer economics

This problem has been allowed to get to ridiculous levels by a stunning level of neglect of national responsibility that would shame the old Tory and Labour post war parties.

Governments must take responsibility for ensuring that basic provision is provided......They are the ones who created the problem by chasing short termist policies: now solve the problem they helped create.

Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Nov 2017 3.08pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 22 Nov 17 2.53pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Small print alert: OBR says stamp duty cut will push up prices and help owners not first-time buyers

The Office for Budget Responsibility is damning about Philip Hammond’s proposal to abolish stamp duty for first-time buyers for homes worth up to £300,000. This is what it is saying.

The OBR says the stamp duty cut will push house prices up. It says it expects this policy to increase prices by 0.3%. Most of this effect will occur in 2018, it says.

Do the OBR and the Treasury not talk?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mstrobez's Profile Mstrobez Flag 22 Nov 17 2.55pm Send a Private Message to Mstrobez Add Mstrobez as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Do agree, a short term tax cut is about the zenith of tory economic policy.

It's the thing that most irks me about the Tories. They're not stupid. Philip Hammond isn't a moron, he knows it's complete bollox, a teenager can work out the concept of supply and demand.

Yet he'll happily implement it for a headline and undoubtedly many average guys on the street will fall for what is complete nonsense.

 


We're the Arthur over ere!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Sewer Rat Flag bromley 22 Nov 17 2.58pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

For the increasing influx of foreigners?

If we sent back every foreigner that has committed a crime, does not work or pay taxes and those that are illegal immigrants we would not have a housing shortage.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 22 Nov 17 2.58pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Small print alert: OBR says stamp duty cut will push up prices and help owners not first-time buyers

The Office for Budget Responsibility is damning about Philip Hammond’s proposal to abolish stamp duty for first-time buyers for homes worth up to £300,000. This is what it is saying.

The OBR says the stamp duty cut will push house prices up. It says it expects this policy to increase prices by 0.3%. Most of this effect will occur in 2018, it says.

Do the OBR and the Treasury not talk?

All taxes, controls, interest rate tampering etc on housing should be scraped and the market allowed to supply demand and determine prices.

Edited by hedgehog50 (22 Nov 2017 2.59pm)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 22 Nov 17 3.02pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

Interesting bits on housing

£44bn capital funding to boost skills, land, SME Builders Loan, Urban Regenration, and Local Council HRH Caps to be reduced.

Planning reform for Urban areas to allow Local Authorities to grant homes for 1st time buyers, and to look into why 170+ planning permissions granted in London haven't seen the building built. If this land is being withheld for commercial rather then development reasons then possibly open to Compulsory Purchase.

Also for 1st Time Buyers, removal of stamp duty for homes up to £300k as of TODAY (good)

Edited by Lyons550 (22 Nov 2017 1.37pm)

As pointed out by the OBR this is only good for current property owners.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 22 Nov 17 3.02pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

All taxes, controls, interest rate tampering etc on housing should be scraped and the market allowed to supply demand and determine prices.

Edited by hedgehog50 (22 Nov 2017 2.59pm)

Good thinking. So no planning permissions, protection of green belt or any other controls. That will go well.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 22 Nov 17 3.04pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

All taxes, controls, interest rate tampering etc on housing should be scraped and the market allowed to supply demand and determine prices.

Edited by hedgehog50 (22 Nov 2017 2.59pm)

To an extent yes, but property is also an asset so you need some tax on its gains. Transaction taxes are inefficient though.

A land value tax would be effective and productive.

Supply needs to be stimulated where the market fails to produce sufficient homes and homes of sufficient quality.

Regulation is also needed to ensure standards are kept and development is environmentally friendly.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 22 Nov 17 3.06pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

The stamp duty exemption is not just for homes up to £300k - the first £300k of a £500k purchase would be exempt, for a first time buyer obviously.

A good step in my opinion.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 22 Nov 17 3.07pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Sewer Rat

If we sent back every foreigner that has committed a crime, does not work or pay taxes and those that are illegal immigrants we would not have a housing shortage.

Oh dear. Please may I see the research behind this statement. If you kicked out all of the indigenous population for whom the same can be said you'd stand a much better chance!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 22 Nov 17 3.08pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Mstrobez

It's the thing that most irks me about the Tories. They're not stupid. Philip Hammond isn't a moron, he knows it's complete bollox, a teenager can work out the concept of supply and demand.

Yet he'll happily implement it for a headline and undoubtedly many average guys on the street will fall for what is complete nonsense.


His main concern was keeping his job, not improving anyone else's life.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View CambridgeEagle's Profile CambridgeEagle Flag Sydenham 22 Nov 17 3.11pm Send a Private Message to CambridgeEagle Add CambridgeEagle as a friend

OBR's assumptions had to be based on May's Florence Speech in regards to post-Brexit Britain. So basically the government's idea of what Brexit means hasn't developed at all in 2 months, from a position which was extremely unclear and woolly headed at the time.

Expect the GDP growth figures to undershoot these already meagre forecasts unless the government ups its game sometime very soon.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 13 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Budget 2017