You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Purley skyscraper petition
April 18 2024 10.09pm

Purley skyscraper petition

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 6 << First< 2 3 4 5 6

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 08 Dec 17 2.35pm

Originally posted by Stuk

Been broken into 3 times since they built some locally, and not once before then. And yes, the people who did it were from there. Not to mention that every time you hear a police car go up the road, it goes to the same place.

If the council want social housing they should build it, rather than piggy-back on someone else's development in a form of blackmail.

It's a s*** development though even if it's all private, I'm against it either way.

In not sure tagging a few social houses onto new developments is ever going to work.

Whatever happened to the idea of building social housing estates? I've got great memories of being a nipper living on a council estate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 08 Dec 17 2.36pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

In not sure tagging a few social houses onto new developments is ever going to work.

Whatever happened to the idea of building social housing estates? I've got great memories of being a nipper living on a council estate.

Oh yeah, they don't make shedloads of money, merely pay for themselves over time with rent.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 08 Dec 17 3.53pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

In not sure tagging a few social houses onto new developments is ever going to work.

Whatever happened to the idea of building social housing estates? I've got great memories of being a nipper living on a council estate.

It's about all they do, it's either in the form of blackmail from the council "we'll give you planning if you give us x number of dwellings" or a bribe from the developer "give us permission and we'll provide x number of social.

They're lazy councils, they should be building their own sites and controlling them. The whole package.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 08 Dec 17 4.16pm

Originally posted by Stuk

It's about all they do, it's either in the form of blackmail from the council "we'll give you planning if you give us x number of dwellings" or a bribe from the developer "give us permission and we'll provide x number of social.

They're lazy councils, they should be building their own sites and controlling them. The whole package.

I'd like to talk about the councils but this is general talk so I daren't risk another yellow, which is a shame as there is a debate about the role of councils and housing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 08 Dec 17 5.10pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

I'd like to talk about the councils but this is general talk so I daren't risk another yellow, which is a shame as there is a debate about the role of councils and housing.

It's a general talk about housing.

You didn't get a yellow for talking politics in GT, you got in for being petulant to the moderators, IMO.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View SW19 CPFC's Profile SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 08 Dec 17 6.01pm Send a Private Message to SW19 CPFC Add SW19 CPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

Been broken into 3 times since they built some locally, and not once before then. And yes, the people who did it were from there. Not to mention that every time you hear a police car go up the road, it goes to the same place.

If the council want social housing they should build it, rather than piggy-back on someone else's development in a form of blackmail.

It's a s*** development though even if it's all private, I'm against it either way.

The mask has really slipped now. Unfortunately for you, the percentage of socially inclusive housing in new developments is only being increased, not decreased. If you can actually prove the identity of your burglars then fine, even if the frequency does seem statistically unlikely. Maybe they’ve heard about your views?

But again with the us and them mentality - segregation, discrimination. Building exclusive flats with no social provision and housing estates for the sole purpose of segregating the rich from the poor simply fuels resentment and inequality. In no way am I saying this is a shining beacon of inclusion but points of view such as yours are the reason there is so much social friction and acceptance of the generally accepted perception of grubby uneducated working poor vs the civilised middle class.

It’s like going back to the 70s. I despair

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 11 Dec 17 3.19pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

The mask has really slipped now. Unfortunately for you, the percentage of socially inclusive housing in new developments is only being increased, not decreased. If you can actually prove the identity of your burglars then fine, even if the frequency does seem statistically unlikely. Maybe they’ve heard about your views?

But again with the us and them mentality - segregation, discrimination. Building exclusive flats with no social provision and housing estates for the sole purpose of segregating the rich from the poor simply fuels resentment and inequality. In no way am I saying this is a shining beacon of inclusion but points of view such as yours are the reason there is so much social friction and acceptance of the generally accepted perception of grubby uneducated working poor vs the civilised middle class.

It’s like going back to the 70s. I despair


What mask? I freely offered up my opinion.

You need to work on your turn of phrase.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 21 Dec 17 11.37am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

How's this looking?

Deserves bumping over the next couple of weeks.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Painter's Profile Painter Flag Croydon 21 Dec 17 5.56pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

It's about all they do, it's either in the form of blackmail from the council "we'll give you planning if you give us x number of dwellings" or a bribe from the developer "give us permission and we'll provide x number of social.

They're lazy councils, they should be building their own sites and controlling them. The whole package.

Its Government policy, Councils have to abide.

Not in favour of your idea of building ghettos. Social inclusion is just what Purley needs in a massive tower block overlooking Tesco shoppers.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View regal_eagle's Profile regal_eagle Flag somewhere 21 Dec 17 6.33pm Send a Private Message to regal_eagle Add regal_eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Painter

Its Government policy, Councils have to abide.

Not in favour of your idea of building ghettos. Social inclusion is just what Purley needs in a massive tower block overlooking Tesco shoppers.

It's the last thing Purley needs.

Numerous smaller builds is what it needs, not one giant eye sore.

...then you still get all those painting jobs you seem to be hawking for..

Edited by regal_eagle (21 Dec 2017 6.34pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 04 Dec 18 1.38pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

It’s been rejected.

Please merge.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 6 of 6 << First< 2 3 4 5 6

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Purley skyscraper petition