On their website its states HOW WE WORK. HOPE not hate exists to challenge all kinds of extremism. They also state they want to counter hate and build inclusive communities.

Hope not Hate would need to be a creditor to be able to apply for an Insolvency Practitioner to be appointed, when Tommy Robinson applied for Bankruptcy an Official Receiver would be appointed by The Insolvency Service which is a government body. The Creditors can then decide if they want to appoint an independent Insolvency Practitioner or not, if the creditors feel it worth shelling out IPs can investigate further. The Official Receiver is a civil servant limited for time and resources while an IP works for a private company so basically you get a fuller service at a cost.
HMRC are a preffered creditor so it is possible they don't want to pursue it further becasue what they are owed is covered by the assets he has declared or don't feel the additional cost is worth the value of the outstanding tax bill.
In Robinsons case the largest Creditors appear to be the legal fees, I've not seen either way whether Hope Not Hate funded the legal fees for Jamal Hijazi or not but if they have they are entitled to try and get there money back which is owing to them from the court ruling.
To be fair the courts are n't stupid if he has signed over a lot of assets to his missus after the court ruling, divorces her straight away and then files for bankruptcy they can see through that and won't sign off on the bankruptcy.

Edited by Ketteridge (20 Jan 2022 10.11pm)

One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

Well according to this story the major terrorist threat is from the Far Right.

[Link]

I hope the Met are not taking their eye off the ball. If they have credible evidence of plotting fair enough none of us want to see any terrorist attacks.

However if the "rise" of the far right is actually teachers reporting little Johnny because he's dad says Nigel Farage is the best well.....

One more point

The Met don't even acknowledge that there is a ball.

An organisation can write whatever it likes in its constitution. It's a useful tool of denial whenever members misbehave. I suspect that the intelligence services, including those of the Met, who wrote this report, and MI5 who have previously said much the same, know what they are talking about. They don't say this kind of thing for no reason. They almost certainly have sources embedded in the organisations and ways of listening to their communications. So I think we can trust them.

Objecting to the political direction being taken by the country is a perfectly legitimate activity. No security service would raise any concerns over that. This has to be something else.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yeah, that's right, you can trust intelligence services.

They don't exaggerate or lie.

Yeah, you see the stuff you're writing here is the very essence of truth....which everyone can see you care deeply about.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)