Corbyns new Muslim Labour group.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
Tom-the-eagle  Croydon 14 Dec 17 5.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dannyh
Diane Abbott is a fanny bangled wnak puffin, who goes on full C##t waffle every time she opens her fat vacuous trap. I'd take more notice of the opinions of a mad house occupant who eats their own shyte. You have such a way with words Danny!
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Dec 17 8.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Astonishing, it seems most of the posts about Labour seem to be by people who don't vote labour, complaining that Labour are doing some such or other that they don't agree with and linking to some questionable right wing blog site.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 14 Dec 17 8.41pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Astonishing, it seems most of the posts about Labour seem to be by people who don't vote labour, complaining that Labour are doing some such or other that they don't agree with and linking to some questionable right wing blog site. I'm astonished that you find it astonishing! It's the eternal "us and them" theme.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| jamiemartin721 Reading 14 Dec 17 8.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I'm astonished that you find it astonishing! It's the eternal "us and them" theme. Its an irony thing, because the same people complain like mad if someone posts a link to a 'fact' from a left wing bias source.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| johnfirewall 14 Dec 17 9.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Astonishing, it seems most of the posts about Labour seem to be by people who don't vote labour, complaining that Labour are doing some such or other that they don't agree with and linking to some questionable right wing blog site. Is there not guidance against such superfluous analysis in the rules of the new Politics forum? Even Guido Fawkes finds it easier to dig out Corbyn and the hypocrites, negating any need to focus on questionable policies and minor allegations (which is more than I can say for certain contributors on here) which I think you'll find is the common gripe displayed in this and similar threads. The noteworthy part is surely the Labour MPs' unsavoury alliances, twisted views, complete ineptitude and ability to alienate while they aren't even in power.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 9.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What have labour said about it. Why was he chosen? And just for a bit of whatabouttery...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Attachment: | johnfirewall 14 Dec 17 10.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
What have labour said about it. Why was he chosen? And just for a bit of whatabouttery... Not sure of the context of that picture but I'm quite sure it's not the PM presenting the leader of a new Conservative party group known as the United States of America. This the month after Corbyn turned out with another controversial Muslim group. Here's how other MPs reacted: "MPs Anna Soubry, Crispin Blunt, Sir Ed Davey and Joanna Cherry had been due to speak at the event, but pulled out after being alerted to the nature of statements made by Mend"
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
PalazioVecchio  south pole 14 Dec 17 10.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The people of Hackney are not voting for Abbott because she is a good politician. Labour could have a bucket of s*** running there and it would still win. well it would win if it were pitched against Diane Abbott. Greater consistency, honesty, transparency, likeability, political acumen, aptitude etc etc.
Eze Peasy at Anfield.... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 10.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by johnfirewall
Not sure of the context of that picture but I'm quite sure it's not the PM presenting the leader of a new Conservative party group known as the United States of America. This the month after Corbyn turned out with another controversial Muslim group. Here's how other MPs reacted: "MPs Anna Soubry, Crispin Blunt, Sir Ed Davey and Joanna Cherry had been due to speak at the event, but pulled out after being alerted to the nature of statements made by Mend"
Had a look at their website, a few glowing testaments from august places there. On the surface, a group that promotes better engagement with the media for Muslims is surely a good thing. Forgive my ignorance, what were the statements made by mend?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 10.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by johnfirewall
Not sure of the context of that picture but I'm quite sure it's not the PM presenting the leader of a new Conservative party group known as the United States of America. This the month after Corbyn turned out with another controversial Muslim group. Here's how other MPs reacted: "MPs Anna Soubry, Crispin Blunt, Sir Ed Davey and Joanna Cherry had been due to speak at the event, but pulled out after being alerted to the nature of statements made by Mend"
Oh come on. Trump is a white supremacist enabler and Treez is holding his grubby hand.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 10.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
well it would win if it were pitched against Diane Abbott. Greater consistency, honesty, transparency, likeability, political acumen, aptitude etc etc. Her vote went up considerably at the last GE. She (and others) are Emmanuel Goldstein figures.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 14 Dec 17 10.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by johnfirewall
Is there not guidance against such superfluous analysis in the rules of the new Politics forum? Even Guido Fawkes finds it easier to dig out Corbyn and the hypocrites, negating any need to focus on questionable policies and minor allegations (which is more than I can say for certain contributors on here) which I think you'll find is the common gripe displayed in this and similar threads. The noteworthy part is surely the Labour MPs' unsavoury alliances, twisted views, complete ineptitude and ability to alienate while they aren't even in power. Hmm. Unsavoury alliances, twisted views, complete ineptitude and ability to alienate. Sorry, which hypocritical Party leader are you referring to? Oh the irony of your timing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.