Well a British Court of Law, ruled that it was down to race, and that the police and local authority, on the basis of the case argued, and evidence presented - And that the police and local authorities failure to act was down to 'instituationalised racism'.

So it fulfils a number of legal requirements. That on review, by a legally appointed member of the judiciary, that on the balance of evidence presented by both the claimant and the respondents, and the arguments by their legal council, that the police and local authority, failed in their duty, not because of incompetence, but due to racial grounds.

Now maybe the court findings were wrong, but then that's where the Police and Local Authority can appeal the decision on a matter of law.

I'm not really sure how much more you'd need before accepting that - The evidence for the claimants (family) case was accepted by the court.

Its not like the Police and Local Authority settled out of court. They went to court, and lost the case.

The murder isn't the point here. The point is that it came after a long period of sustained criminality focused on the victim, who repeatedly reported this to the Local authority and the Police, who in turn did nothing (in fact less than nothing, the Police on several occasions actively sided with the residents who were victimising the man).

Also the police and local authorities were aware, when he was being targeted as a pedophile, and did nothing until he was eventually beaten to death by residents on the estate, his body dragged to wasteground and he was set on fire.