You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > More disarray
April 24 2024 5.27am

More disarray

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 5 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 21 Dec 17 2.25pm

There s a major hit to yer pension if you are sacked as a minister, however if you resign....

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 21 Dec 17 2.26pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

Perhaps we should simply sack ALL politicians that lie to Parliment...but if we did...how many would be left?

it's the Seven Principles of Public Life from the Ministerial Code.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 21 Dec 17 2.27pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

There s a major hit to yer pension if you are sacked as a minister, however if you resign....

So he was sensible then.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View npn's Profile npn Flag Crowborough 21 Dec 17 2.41pm Send a Private Message to npn Add npn as a friend

Originally posted by silvertop

I really don't get this. The "coppers are out to get us" was always a distraction to try and save Green that ultimately did not work. Where the information comes from is irrelevant.

I find it quite concerning. The police were there looking for evidence of illegal activity, they found none. The officer in question then chose to divulge information about what other, perfectly legal, activity they discovered. I don't know what the law says but I, for one, find it uncomfortable that officers should divulge information they come across during their work willy-nilly with the sole intention of wrecking an innocent man's career. Anything a policeman discovers during investigation deserves to remain private or, at least, within the force. What if they searched someone's home for drugs, and discovered none, but loads of fetish gear - surely that person should still maintain his privacy?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 21 Dec 17 2.53pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

He looks the type.

I get a bit miffed on over sensitivity regards sex....which the country is still so frigging obsessed about....but it was certainly very unprofessional......though rather deliciously.....like some teenager caught with his 'hand in the cookie jar'...so to speak.... he still claimed it wasn't him.

Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Dec 2017 12.43pm)

I think it's like the hate speech discussion before. It's a gradual creep from both left and right to making almost everything some kind of crime. That way eventually as soon as you pop out of the birth canal you're bound to be guilty of something or other so had better watch it! With such a system in place it can be selectively applied and so it suits whatever government of the day or social outrage or token gesture is important at the time.

I must admit I do feel a bit bad for this fellow if it wasn't even him. He may well have not really been aware of what was going on.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 21 Dec 17 2.55pm

Originally posted by wordup

I think it's like the hate speech discussion before. It's a gradual creep from both left and right to making almost everything some kind of crime. That way eventually as soon as you pop out of the birth canal you're bound to be guilty of something or other so had better watch it! With such a system in place it can be selectively applied and so it suits whatever government of the day or social outrage or token gesture is important at the time.

I must admit I do feel a bit bad for this fellow if it wasn't even him. He may well have not really been aware of what was going on.

Green broke ministerial code. End of.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 21 Dec 17 3.04pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by wordup

I think it's like the hate speech discussion before. It's a gradual creep from both left and right to making almost everything some kind of crime. That way eventually as soon as you pop out of the birth canal you're bound to be guilty of something or other so had better watch it! With such a system in place it can be selectively applied and so it suits whatever government of the day or social outrage or token gesture is important at the time.

I must admit I do feel a bit bad for this fellow if it wasn't even him. He may well have not really been aware of what was going on.

A reasonable post.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 21 Dec 17 3.11pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

You wouldn't want to serve in her administration, even if you were a saint she would believe something ill of you.

I guess a re-shuffle likely with slimey Hunt getting a position.

yuk......

The only human tory and they get rid of him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mr_Gristle's Profile Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 21 Dec 17 5.07pm Send a Private Message to Mr_Gristle Add Mr_Gristle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

A shocking and very transparent ploy to get him sacked.

What a shame we live in such a Machiavellian world where some scum bags will do anything to try and undermine the government.

Whoa, what? A copper is wrong for exposing the Deputy Prime Minister's mendacity and use of workplace IT that would get Joe Public sacked?

No one is above the law. Or are they?

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 21 Dec 17 5.35pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

Green broke ministerial code. End of.

That may well be true. I was just trying to add a bit of nuance because it's very easy for people, left and right to cheer the downfall of someone who doesn't share their views. That's fair enough, but there is a downside to that kind of mentality too. It creates an unforgiving environment that's more cut and dry that real life often tends to be.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 21 Dec 17 5.35pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

A reasonable post.

Thankyou kindly

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 21 Dec 17 6.09pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

Whoa, what? A copper is wrong for exposing the Deputy Prime Minister's mendacity and use of workplace IT that would get Joe Public sacked?

No one is above the law. Or are they?

It's a rather strange thing to do when you are retired.
A cynic would think that there must have been an incentive.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 5 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > More disarray