Should RIC go back to Chelsea?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 sxp55  South Norwood 22 Jan 18 11.05am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Surprised by the comments about RLC. Think he's a class act and if you looked at him when playing you could spot him out of the crowd as one that was on loan from a bigger club. Was brilliant for England in centre mid, but shunted out wide when playing for Palace. Still don't understand that. However, if he's injured, then send him back.
@sxp55555 |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Eaglecoops CR3 22 Jan 18 12.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This is an easy answer, if he is injured with little prospect of playing again this season then of course he has to go back. We desperately need that loan spot for a prem player.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| MonsterMunch Cambridge 22 Jan 18 12.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
This is an easy answer, if he is injured with little prospect of playing again this season then of course he has to go back. We desperately need that loan spot for a prem player. Yes it is. I can't believe Roy truly believes hanging onto him in case he can recover in time for the last few games. We need someone for the many not the few surely? How can we afford to carry someone and take up a valuable loan space in our condition? I'm not sure if Ruben has been fully assessed yet. Maybe Roy is holding on to make a decision? The other factor being none of us know if we can even send him back.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jan 18 12.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Yes it is. I can't believe Roy truly believes hanging onto him in case he can recover in time for the last few games. We need someone for the many not the few surely? How can we afford to carry someone and take up a valuable loan space in our condition? I'm not sure if Ruben has been fully assessed yet. Maybe Roy is holding on to make a decision? The other factor being none of us know if we can even send him back. Good point. Another thought suppose we want to sign him at the end of the season and privately Chelsea say it is possible. Wouldn't it make sense to wait a few days before returning him so that he feels the love. Not sure I would join a club that kicks me out 5 mins after I got injured especially if the extent of the injury is unclear. So manage his return to Chelsea so he knows we want him.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
boo909  Figeac 22 Jan 18 3.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I had an odd dream last night that we just threw him in the back of a transit van and drove him back.
Bangell - If Camus wrote The Myth of Sisyphus today, it would be about Jason Puncheon eternally trying and failing to pass with his right foot. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 22 Jan 18 3.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Yes it is. I can't believe Roy truly believes hanging onto him in case he can recover in time for the last few games. We need someone for the many not the few surely? How can we afford to carry someone and take up a valuable loan space in our condition? I'm not sure if Ruben has been fully assessed yet. Maybe Roy is holding on to make a decision? The other factor being none of us know if we can even send him back. Yes and further to that, were the boot on the other foot and we had loaned someone a player, only for him to pick up a long term injury, how happy would we be if the other club was saying "take this injured player back and give us another one"?
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cpj Kent 22 Jan 18 3.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by sxp55
Surprised by the comments about RLC. Think he's a class act and if you looked at him when playing you could spot him out of the crowd as one that was on loan from a bigger club. Was brilliant for England in centre mid, but shunted out wide when playing for Palace. Still don't understand that. This ^^
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Littlebogreek  22 Jan 18 3.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BelfastEagle
The guy has shown very little playing for us. He seems to have built a reputation based on one England game....even then he was injured for the second England game. At least he is consistently injured. Huge warning signs that somebody so relatively young is plagued by so many injuries. Send him back if possible and move on. Any thoughts of buying him would be utter folly....we have enough sick notes already. There's been a few posts like this. I'm surprised that people feel this way - he was quality when we played him in the middle, switched him wide and he didn't have the same effect (unsurprisingly as this clearly isn't his position) but still chipped in with a couple of assists. He is a class footballer and if people can't see that I'm surprised - not sure the last player I saw at Palace that so rarely loses the ball or gives it away cheaply. The injuries thing is a concern though, especially given his age. I agree he should go back if he isn't going to be fit any time soon, makes little sense - unless of course we don't believe we are likely to loan anyone that will help us out anyway so may as well keep him since I can't imagine we will get any of our loan fee back - which also makes me wonder re fines etc. Read on the weekend (can't remember the player) that if the club that have loaned him don't play him enough, they have to pay an extra fee. Unlikely but possible we face a fine if we send him back as he won't hit a game qouta - one that has a caveat if he is injured. Or I could be talking nonsense. think it's probably nonsense.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Palace in the Blood 22 Jan 18 3.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Littlebogreek
There's been a few posts like this. I'm surprised that people feel this way - he was quality when we played him in the middle, switched him wide and he didn't have the same effect (unsurprisingly as this clearly isn't his position) but still chipped in with a couple of assists. He is a class footballer and if people can't see that I'm surprised - not sure the last player I saw at Palace that so rarely loses the ball or gives it away cheaply. The injuries thing is a concern though, especially given his age. I agree he should go back if he isn't going to be fit any time soon, makes little sense - unless of course we don't believe we are likely to loan anyone that will help us out anyway so may as well keep him since I can't imagine we will get any of our loan fee back - which also makes me wonder re fines etc. Read on the weekend (can't remember the player) that if the club that have loaned him don't play him enough, they have to pay an extra fee. Unlikely but possible we face a fine if we send him back as he won't hit a game qouta - one that has a caveat if he is injured. Or I could be talking nonsense. think it's probably nonsense. Us TFM if we cancel the loan there was an extra £1 million fee
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Direwolf Lincoln 22 Jan 18 3.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
As it is now confirmed that we have Rakip on loan from Benfica does this mean that RLC has in fact gone back to Chelsea? edit: Just checked and the loan restrictions apply to loans from 'Premiership and English clubs' so this presumably is fine. Edited by Direwolf (22 Jan 2018 3.41pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Tipp_Eagle  Tipperary 22 Jan 18 8.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This subject was me panicking guys sorry. Looks like the ullua loan from Leicester city is off and RLC won't be going back to Chelsea. Roy just said in an interview he is out for 3 weeks so I doubt we will be cancelling the loan contract. Unless it's all game news of course. You know what they say believe none of what you read and half of what you see .
oh yeah ,fcuk off brighton. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Forest Hillbilly  in a hidey-hole 23 Jan 18 7.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by TheExpatEagle
Remy went back to Chelsea for treatment, the loan wasn't cancelled. Usually with long term injuries the parent club treats them as the player is their asset and wants to make sure they are treated correctly. We should have cancelled Remy's loan as soon as he was injured. Chelsea have stitched us up with loan the last 3 seasons. Players are insured against injury, so their wages and treatment should be covered. Bit of a cvntish situation, though
"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.