Glenn Murray.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 YT  Oxford 25 Jan 18 9.50am |
  |
|---|---|
|
I’m surprised that a “£1.1m home” is even worth mentioning these days (see the original link). Unless it’s trying to imply that he lived quite frugally for a Premiership footballer. Round these parts a million would still buy a nice house - don’t get me wrong - but nothing that special.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
DutchEagleJohan  Vlissingen, Netherlands 25 Jan 18 10.39am |
|
|---|---|
|
Which makes one wonder how people get by on "the living wage". Or less...... Originally posted by YT
I’m surprised that a “£1.1m home” is even worth mentioning these days (see the original link). Unless it’s trying to imply that he lived quite frugally for a Premiership footballer. Round these parts a million would still buy a nice house - don’t get me wrong - but nothing that special.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 25 Jan 18 11.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
He was arrested on both VAT and income tax issues but she only income tax. I wonder how come he would have a potentially huge VAT bill. Hunch would be that he has his own Ltd company for things like image rights and she's an employee of the company drawing a salary/taking a dividend.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 25 Jan 18 11.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by npn
Depends if he's working as a contractor (rather than PAYE) - if so, he would then be charging Brighton for his services and the fee would be liable to VAT (which should then go to HMRC minus any vatable expenses), so basically 20% on top of his wages, but it's not 'his'. Professional footballers are deemed to be employees of the club and not contractors
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| npn Crowborough 25 Jan 18 11.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Professional footballers are deemed to be employees of the club and not contractors Happy to defer (I have no idea, but I have to say I'm slightly surprised they are PAYE) likely to be separate image rights company then, I'd imagine
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 25 Jan 18 12.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by npn
Happy to defer (I have no idea, but I have to say I'm slightly surprised they are PAYE) likely to be separate image rights company then, I'd imagine IR35 innit. He only has one employer, uses its facilities, can’t replace himself with an alternate, has his working pattern set by the club and is performance managed by the club. Couldn’t be a clearer case of being an employee, albeit I bet clever accountants keep trying to find an angle. Edited by Mapletree (25 Jan 2018 12.06pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| npn Crowborough 25 Jan 18 12.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
IR35 innit. He only has one employer, uses its facilities, can’t replace himself with an alternate, has his working pattern set by the club and is performance managed by the club. Couldn’t be a clearer case of being an employee, albeit I bet clever accountants keep trying to find an angle. Edited by Mapletree (25 Jan 2018 12.06pm) Too right - I was bang to rights, been at the same place 4 years, accountants still said "no, IR35 exempt" (permie now, BTW)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| robdave2k 25 Jan 18 12.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
There's absolutely no way this over IR35/Paye My money would be on the company dissolved a few years ago and what it was listed as doing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 25 Jan 18 12.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by npn
Happy to defer (I have no idea, but I have to say I'm slightly surprised they are PAYE) likely to be separate image rights company then, I'd imagine I Googled it and HMRC has a paragraph devoted to professional footballers. You're probably right about image rights being paid to a separate limited company though
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 25 Jan 18 1.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Footballers are definitely PAYE. This explains the image rights stuff quite well.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 25 Jan 18 8.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Few years back an acquaintance dodged
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nobody sussex 01 Feb 18 5.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I heard today that Glen got confused between living in Newhaven and living in a tax haven
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.