Ashley barnes (rumour)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 mattteo  28 Jan 18 10.55pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mwncisee
So the response on here for Barnes is somewhat negative....Wonder what the Chelski fans make of Barnes being a target for them! Chelsea has been linked in this winter with Andy Carroll, Peter Crouch, Ashley Barnes and Benteke. Chelsea fans can't think anything else except that Conte has lost his darn minds. They've gotten used to the incredible names by now!!
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
chateauferret  28 Jan 18 11.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by mattteo
Chelsea has been linked in this winter with Andy Carroll, Peter Crouch, Ashley Barnes and Benteke. Chelsea fans can't think anything else except that Conte has lost his darn minds. They've gotten used to the incredible names by now!! Any or all of those rumours are likely to be bollocks anyway, of course.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| alaneagle1 Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 29 Jan 18 12.11am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by mattteo
Chelsea has been linked in this winter with Andy Carroll, Peter Crouch, Ashley Barnes and Benteke. Chelsea fans can't think anything else except that Conte has lost his darn minds. They've gotten used to the incredible names by now!! Conte is not involved in signing Chelsea Players.
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
coulsdoneagle  London 29 Jan 18 12.11am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by alaneagle1
Disagree we need a Goalscorer,if we do not get the right man now so be it. We don’t, but Barnes clearly isn’t that. He can offer something at PL level as he has shown. I should make it clear, I don’t want him, but having no cover for Benteke is worse than signing someone who isn’t our ideal first choice challenging striker.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 29 Jan 18 12.18am |
|
|---|---|
|
Barnes was playing non-league before Ian Holloway signed him for Plymouth.Puncheon was at Plymouth at the same times as Barnes.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| pstrutt Busselton, WA 29 Jan 18 1.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
I rate him. Always have. He’s a nuisance and has an instinctive approach to scoring. I’d even go as far to say that he’s as good as Wickham IMHO. That might’ve been different had Wickham not always been crocked.
So I manage a Workshop which provides a safe learning environment for blokes struggling with PTSD and other mental health issues. Being a Palace fan isn't listed yet. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 29 Jan 18 7.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Yes, I kind of agree. Not 100% convinced. But I could see it working. He might be the sort of buzzy foil that might create a bit of movement up front and thus some space for Benteke. To be honest, I think he might be all right. One thing is for sure, I would rather spend £11 million on Ashley Barnes than £21 million on Troy Deeney.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 29 Jan 18 7.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
I’d take both Barnes and Livermore. Over the course of Roy’s reign, arguably two of the most consistent performers have been Tomkins and McArthur. Seasoned pros who get in with the job. That is to me, what Barnes and Livermore would bring to the squad. In today’s market, the sums being spoken about aren’t significant. These may not be the Eder’s of this world but they are useful additions to a team in our position.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ARGILE OLD GEEZER  PORTIMAO 29 Jan 18 8.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
Could just be a move to get our other targets teams to play ball. We need someone, there are a lot better options than Barnes, but buying no one would be a far worse option. It’s a no from me, unless we don’t get anyone else, in which case, welcome to Palace. I think that sums it up perfectly, defiantly a no no ,unless...............
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ARGILE OLD GEEZER PORTIMAO 29 Jan 18 8.10am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I certainly did ! Who was it scored the one against us a couple of years ago, the french chappie was in goal
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Petereagle Brockley 29 Jan 18 8.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
I’d take both Barnes and Livermore. Over the course of Roy’s reign, arguably two of the most consistent performers have been Tomkins and McArthur. Seasoned pros who get in with the job. That is to me, what Barnes and Livermore would bring to the squad. In today’s market, the sums being spoken about aren’t significant. These may not be the Eder’s of this world but they are useful additions to a team in our position. Very well argued. Barnes and Livermore would definitely add to the depth of the squad if not much in additional quality. They would ‘do a job’http://www.hltco.org/2018/01/29/report-palace-set-make-bid-chelsea-linked-strike
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Petereagle Brockley 29 Jan 18 8.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Petereagle
Very well argued. Barnes and Livermore would definitely add to the depth of the squad if not much in additional quality. They would ‘do a job’
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.