I have already outlined why I think Center Parcs thought it was inappropriate placement. In their business, corporate eyes, it absolutely is related. It's a straightforward business decision to keep as much money rolling in as possible.

No game. I just don't see how opinions are being stifled here. Man exercises his right to free speech and expresses his opinion in a national newspaper. Multi-million pound company exercise their right to respond to their customers' concerns (because it could potentially affect their business) and withdraw advertising. Man continues to express his opinion in a national newspaper. Free speech alive and well.

You are not commenting on the activists who seek to damage the reputation of these companies through their lefty mates in the media highlighting their complaints.

So you think that companies make these decisions out of some sense of agreeing with lefty morality.

The same companies who use capitalism and the courts to fight their competition with no regard to morality at all.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Get a life you sad c*nt.

It seems to me that you are defending the logic of their decision while ignoring the wider implications to society. We all know why corporations try to appear right on, but we need to think about what that profit driven remodelling of our society will look like.
A tiny minority of fruitcakes are having far to big an influence just by being noisy and threatening commerce.
This is the mentality of the zealous activist as this web site has experienced recently. Love everyone until they slight me, then threaten their livelihood. Total scum.

I wouldn't disagree with most of that commentary.

However, I most strongly object to these companies caving to activists because of what amounts to media bullying.

There is a section of both the far or activist left and right who are prepared to sack people and disown people and publicly dox people and while.....the lefty ones hold sway culturally at the moment I consider this kind of activist power as negative for society and something that needs to be reigned in.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Enough kids in the world already so we should look at a fair and efficient adoption system.

That's my only issue. My real problem is with people who would reject my criticism, and those who if down the line are faced with a soaring percentage of population being in therapy, would blame those who don't subscribe to their ideals.

Edited by johnfirewall (19 Feb 2018 10.37am)