Ant McPartlin
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Stuk  Top half 18 Apr 18 7.14pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
The 'sentence' of 3 days wages and a driving ban seems appropriate. Until you consider that fact that the BBC will pick up his expenses tab and pay for his taxi's while he is banned from driving. He won't lose a penny. TV licence payers will cover the cost No, he'll lose about 8.6 million of them.
Optimistic as ever |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Midlands Eagle 18 Apr 18 7.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
The 'sentence' of 3 days wages and a driving ban seems appropriate. Until you consider that fact that the BBC will pick up his expenses tab and pay for his taxi's while he is banned from driving. He won't lose a penny. TV licence payers will cover the cost The fine is irrelevant just as it is with ordinary mortals that get caught drink driving as most people can afford to pay it but the real punishment is the inconvenience that being unable to drive will cause and although he could probably afford taxis and/or a chauffeur they aren't always convenient. His employers won't pick up the tab for him as the outcry if that was ever made public would be enormous
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| palace72 coulsdon 18 Apr 18 7.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
He works for ITV under contract,why would the BBC pay his bills? Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
The 'sentence' of 3 days wages and a driving ban seems appropriate. Until you consider that fact that the BBC will pick up his expenses tab and pay for his taxi's while he is banned from driving. He won't lose a penny. TV licence payers will cover the cost
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.