Corbynista. IRA,Hamas, Anti Semetic, Munich Terrorists,PLO, Black September Etc etc .....

Pro USA & Israel

I'm not arrogant enough to think I have the answers. I know you've tried to turn yourself into some sort of overt arbiter of these boards and shout down anyone who believes different to you and always think you're right.

I'm rational enough to know that the 'answers' and the reality/truth typically lies somewhere in the middle. I also don't tie myself to any political party - I don't identify closely enough to anyone. I also dislike tribal politics as nothing ever gets done and all you get is shouting and people pushing their own cause.

I've also found that he who shouts the most and loudest, typically has the least of value to say. Something these boards have definitely proven.

Edited by DanH (23 Oct 2018 1.41pm)

Really? But you're arrogant enough to think you know people's motivations and 'agendas'. So as usual, no 'correcting' from you just the usual moaning about others.

I shout down nobody, that's untrue.

If the flaws I pick out in other people's arguments result in them withdrawing that's their choice. I have no issues with robust debate and the only complaints from me have come from excessive swearing (which I have been known to ignore) or threats of physical violence.

Yes I think I'm right on this, but I'm there to be proven incorrect. Because believe me, I'm going to continue picking your arguments apart.

I don't believe you, I think you vote Labour and will continue to....but that is your choice and right, but I don't buy the implied political independence.

As for those who contribute to the boards. I default welcome them, whether they agree with me or not and I do so in the spirit of free speech....regardless of your contempt for them or some of them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Oct 2018 4.14pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I would agree with you that Robinson isn't ideal and even I differ with him on some points.

If Douglas Murray came down from his lofty tower and get his hands dirty then it might be a different matter......but he's too smart to be the pioneer.

However, Robinson deserves massive respect for being the only one out there who is willing to buck the 'politicians' narrative and expose their lies and the lies of the media.

Who else is doing it?

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Oct 2018 4.22pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I stopped reading there.

You do understand that this is everything to do with behaviour and nothing to do with 'race'.

Of course you don't.

Not that Islam is a race by any reasonable definition.

It's just that if the same demographic has people who keep doing the same bad things, it is not unreasonable to recognise this and to call them out for it. Surely all the nice law abiding people in that demographic would want to route out the scum as well wouldn't they?

Unless you think that certain sections of society should be protected from criticism because of their identity?

On that basis, maybe White racists should be exempt from blame because they are White.

You talk about 'racist bigots' yet the truth is that it's you who are part of the problem.

It's people like you with your comments here that the Islamic reformers point at. Not Hopkins and Robinson.

You represent support for cover that the left provide for the real problems here.

You give me an an article that seeks to cast doubt on the rape statistics provided by the 'Quilliam Foundation' a well known Islamic anti extremist group and governmental statistics themselves.

When I look at the article it makes the claim that the girls selected by these near exclusively Muslim men weren't selected with a 'racial motive'??? Instant strawman.

I mean...I nearly laughed. While there is probably a racial aspect to it as nearly all the girls are white girls the reality is the main motive is the non Islamic girl demographic.

Looking at the other claim the article makes.......it's looking at governmental studies and seeking to cast doubt on those studies.....even though it doesn't know the methods used it suggests they were inaccurate.....excuse me....where's the evidence for for suggesting the geographical data is incorrect?....what because they want it to be?......How stupid do these apologists get.....it suggests that the state, which institutions have done their upmost to protect these rapists for fear of racism claims....have in reality somehow deliberately compiled the data incorrectly on them.

Yet zero evidence for those claims, just projection.

Try reading the book, 'Easy Meat'.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Oct 2018 6.08pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)