So I guess the question for you is, is it 'wrong' to be rich? (I'm not, by the way). Is it wrong to bring something of real value into the world and prosper from it? I'm not talking about bankers, royaly etc., but people who create something of real value, like music, or useful innovations. Your point basically implies that it's immoral to be able to attend private schools, or be able to afford private healthcare. Unless I'm reading it wrong?

I would never say it's immoral to be rich. What this thread is about is social division and minority groups undermining the desires of the majority. I'm saying that this is nowhere more evident in the divide between rich and poor, which over the past few decades has widened to a staggering level, and is reflected in the segregated social services the two groups use and the urban layouts we see around us.

There are of course wealthy people who attempt to use their fortunate positions positively. But we currently have a government and media class drawn almost entirely from a tiny sub sector of our society eho are dictating the policy and budgeting for the rest of us. It is therefore unsurprising that issues like social housing and state education services are seen as minor to them, and that the man who's trying to focus our attention on them is regarded as a traitor, racist, delusional and dangerous idiot.

I would never say it's immoral to be rich. What this thread is about is social division and minority groups undermining the desires of the majority. I'm saying that this is nowhere more evident in the divide between rich and poor, which over the past few decades has widened to a staggering level, and is reflected in the segregated social services the two groups use and the urban layouts we see around us.

There are of course wealthy people who attempt to use their fortunate positions positively. But we currently have a government and media class drawn almost entirely from a tiny sub sector of our society eho are dictating the policy and budgeting for the rest of us. It is therefore unsurprising that issues like social housing and state education services are seen as minor to them, and that the man who's trying to focus our attention on them is regarded as a traitor, racist, delusional and dangerous idiot.

I think whatever your opinions of Corbyn's politics, it's fair to say he represents something different.

By ‘majority’ do you mean the oh so oppressed over 40 white males that inhabit this forum?

Different is not better in this case. He has spent his whole career opposing everything, including his own party.
Why would a white, home owning person, over 50, want to vote for a man like him? He does not represent middle England at all.