Low IQ woman destroys life retains her own.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Stuk Top half 24 May 18 12.34pm
Originally posted by Badger11 Evil woman however I would have agreed with the jury. It is clear she planned and intended to cause him great harm however his death was ultimately his choice. Murder was not a foreseeable consequence of her actions. That said I would have found her guilty of manslaughter. Not sure was she not charged with that as her actions did lead to his death. Either way 12 years for what she did was way too light but I am not sure what the judge could have given her. They could've given her 21 years like that TOWIE t*** got, even though his case resulted in no deaths. I wouldn't agree that death was ultimately his choice either, were he an animal he'd have been put out of his misery a lot more quickly. Paralysed from the neck down, lost an eye, an ear and a leg and was left in "the most inconceivable pain imaginable". Optimistic as ever
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk

Top half 24 May 18 12.34pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Evil woman however I would have agreed with the jury. It is clear she planned and intended to cause him great harm however his death was ultimately his choice.

Murder was not a foreseeable consequence of her actions. That said I would have found her guilty of manslaughter. Not sure was she not charged with that as her actions did lead to his death.

Either way 12 years for what she did was way too light but I am not sure what the judge could have given her.

They could've given her 21 years like that TOWIE t*** got, even though his case resulted in no deaths.

I wouldn't agree that death was ultimately his choice either, were he an animal he'd have been put out of his misery a lot more quickly. Paralysed from the neck down, lost an eye, an ear and a leg and was left in "the most inconceivable pain imaginable".

Optimistic as ever

Alert a moderator to this post

rob1969 Banstead Surrey 24 May 18 1.20pm
Her actions contributed considerably - maybe totally - to his eventual death therefore she could have been found guilty of murder. The fact the jury did not suggests there were cicumstances - not explained in the article- that made them give the verdict the did. Who supplied the acid? Who poured it in the glass? Did she realise that it was acid? Whatever the reasons for the verdict she should have been give a longer sentence given the extreme severity of his life changing injuries. Edited by rob1969 (24 May 2018 1.24pm) Edited by rob1969 (24 May 2018 1.25pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

rob1969

Banstead Surrey 24 May 18 1.20pm

Her actions contributed considerably - maybe totally - to his eventual death therefore she could have been found guilty of murder. The fact the jury did not suggests there were cicumstances - not explained in the article- that made them give the verdict the did.
Who supplied the acid? Who poured it in the glass?
Did she realise that it was acid?
Whatever the reasons for the verdict she should have been give a longer sentence given the extreme severity of his life changing injuries.

Edited by rob1969 (24 May 2018 1.24pm)

Edited by rob1969 (24 May 2018 1.25pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 2 of 2 << First < 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Low IQ woman destroys life retains her own.

Site Map

Sponsors