You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tax rises needed 'to prevent NHS misery'
April 24 2024 5.53am

Tax rises needed 'to prevent NHS misery'

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

 

View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 24 May 18 1.04pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by europalace

"it would require rises of 3p in the pound on each of income tax, VAT and National Insurance by 2033."

[Link]

Sadly that's an incredibly simplistic view..the system needs to be reformed at the same time...cutting much of the waste, resulting in a potential net increase in tax of 1p in the pound. That money should also be ringfenced for certain things, such as nurses and preventative care...not just for consultants; agency staff; over inflated drug prices and another layer of middle management.

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 24 May 18 1.07pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

Although there are 120 thousand non-British citizens working in the NHS...

The people 'contributing next to nothing' are the elderly, whose number is also going up year on year and who are in most need of medical support and social care. How are we supposed to solve that crisis without turning to migration?

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 24 May 18 1.12pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by CambridgeEagle

BT etc have to plug their pension deficits by cutting jobs, wages, benefits etc of current staff not the ones who creamed it off the top for years and are now retired.

Wow. You are a very bitter man

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 24 May 18 1.13pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by aquickgame2

They ( the different governments ) took out as much as they wanted during my working life,I had no choice as to what they wanted,where they allocated it.

Now its my time to take as much as I can out of it..selfish,you bet I am.

I've argued for a few years on here about 'choosing' where a portion of our taxes go to. The usual, defence, NHS, Judical system and Education would be ringfenced in my ideal world...with the remaining 20% of someones tax burden going to up to 4 different areas. These areas could all 'tout' for my support accordingly.

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Midlands Eagle's Profile Midlands Eagle Flag 24 May 18 1.17pm Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

The people 'contributing next to nothing' are the elderly, whose number is also going up year on year and who are in most need of medical support and social care. How are we supposed to solve that crisis without turning to migration?

There are other ways to contribute apart from paying tax and most pensioners contribute to the economy by spending.

This particular pensioner is still working and paying high levels of both Corporation and Income Tax and tends to spend quite a lot too

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 24 May 18 1.17pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

The simplest way of funding the increase necessary for the NHS to function is simply to scrap brexit.



***GRENADE***

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 24 May 18 1.23pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550


***GRENADE***

A soggy fart, more like

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 24 May 18 1.23pm

I think you will find the changing demographics of the country would make a far bigger impact on the costs for a single year than the whole total for any (disputed or unsubstantiated) migrant cost.


In the next 15 years the growth in the number of over 65s will be bigger than that of all persons under 65. It a similar problem as pensions with longevity but this time the illnesses that come with longevity. A person over 65 generally costs the NHS over 3 times as much as someone under 65 years.


The biggest problem is the NHS itself for several reasons (this isn't an all inclusive or exhaustive list):


1 It under sells its on reasearch to pharma's teh buys back at full price.

2 It undertakes unneccesary operations and services, like fertility, and some plastic surgery.

3 It conflates public and private services with teh easier and more profitable services being cherry picked and done by the same individual but for profit outside the NHS.

4 It has no written scope to describe the boundaries of what is avaialble. For example should all citizens of the UK be able to access drugs that cost 40K a month but merely delay death by a few months.

5 Better but more costly surgical procedures etc, saving those which would have died.

5 Post surgery or hospital care, and bed blocking.

6 The dicotomy that it campaigns to increase overall health of the nation costing money, whilst having to deal with more chronic disease related to old age like diabetes, heart conditions or senility; which costs massive amounts of money.

7 Containg supervirus caused by poor drug prescribing, hospital cleaniness etc.

Society needs to decide what it wants and what it is willing to pay for before doing the costings. Costings should be a constraint and not the allowed run up Tsunami-like.

Perhaps we would be better to relax regulations on smoking drinking etc; perhaps the elderly pay more tax.

We need to make decisions first rather than chuck money at a public monolith which many see as so sacred it can not be questioned.

Anyway enough about the NHS lets get back to debating sending the Windrush generation home because they now cost too much.


Edited by pefwin (24 May 2018 1.30pm)

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jimenez's Profile Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 24 May 18 1.31pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by serial thriller

Where are the ghettos? Tower Hamlets or Stoke on Trent? Or is it Londonderry, where levels of poverty exceed the previous two even though most immigrants are Irish?

There is a big difference between us and Japan which is that in most of the cases of migration in to our country, migrants are coming from areas where we have extended our political authority. In the case of Commonwealth migrants, that means that many of them are actually citizens, coming from countries like Jamaica where they were British subjects before we even took Ireland.

In the more modern case of the EU, we were one of the earlier entrants who aggressively pushed for the inclusion of Eastern European and Baltic states. This allowed our banks to push tarriff free loans on them (and allowed us to fly for peanuts and get pissed in Krakow, Split etc). Then when their citizens took advantage of free movement the other way, we took their cheap trade but routinely demonized them using some of the oldest cultural stereotypes in the book.

Unless Britain takes some responsibility for our actions abroad we will be condemned to repeat history over and over again. And as im sure you could more eloquently summarise than me, it is the poor on both sides that suffer.

**Correction**

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 24 May 18 1.31pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by pefwin

Anyway enough about the NHS lets get back to debating sending the Windrush generation home because they now cost too much.

Nope, a country doesn't renege upon those who have been here for decades, even though it was a mistake to provide citizenship to them originally. They should have been here on a 'foreign worker' basis.

This country needs to stop running an immigration ponzi scheme on the British tax payer. Our relaxed attitude to immigration has given us a larger problem in regardless to pensioners.

The idea that has been suggested that we can only just carry on importing more and more young foreigners here is an incoherent and illogical argument.

The 'no borders' left who want the minority votes and those sections of the economic right who want cheap labour have selfishly buggered up this country.

The economic right keep quiet while the left just lie and deny.

The answer is in automation and in having guest 'foreign workers' not giving citizenship rights to people to bring in their dependents.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 May 2018 1.32pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 24 May 18 1.34pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Nope, a country doesn't renege upon those who have been here for decades, even though it was a mistake to provide citizenship to them originally. They should have been here on a 'foreign worker' basis.

This country needs to stop running an immigration ponzi scheme on the British tax payer. Our relaxed attitude to immigration has given us a larger problem in regardless to pensioners.

The idea that has been suggested that we can only just carry on importing more and more young foreigners here is an incoherent and illogical argument.

The 'no borders' left who want the minority votes and those sections of the economic right who want cheap labour have selfishly buggered up this country.

The economic right keep quiet while the left just lie and deny.

The answer is in automation and in having guest 'foreign workers' not giving citizenship rights to people to bring in their dependents.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 May 2018 1.32pm)


You do realise this a thread about the NHS, you should start a fresh one on immigration.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 24 May 18 1.39pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by pefwin

You do realise this a thread about the NHS, you should start a fresh one on immigration.

I start enough threads as it is, how about you start one.

No offence meant but the only person I really listen to about evolving threads is the OP as it's their thread. Most long threads take twists and turns.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tax rises needed 'to prevent NHS misery'