Antifa call black man a Nazi and Racist

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 185 of 252 < 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 >

Spiderman Horsham 23 Jun 20 6.13pm
Originally posted by Mapletree It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping But hey, some people simply don't understand why Black Lives Matter isn't All Lives Matter. Put simply, all lives do matter but it's black people whose lives have been treated as less important to date (since the 15th century) and need a greater focus. Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree. [Link] The over the top support of a movement started by 2 committed Marxists is what is grating my gears, PL can now suddenly support a political movement (imo that’s what it is) Will the PL call for a minute silence in respect to the Reading standings? Your call
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 23 Jun 20 6.13pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping

But hey, some people simply don't understand why Black Lives Matter isn't All Lives Matter. Put simply, all lives do matter but it's black people whose lives have been treated as less important to date (since the 15th century) and need a greater focus.

Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree.

[Link]

The over the top support of a movement started by 2 committed Marxists is what is grating my gears, PL can now suddenly support a political movement (imo that’s what it is)

Will the PL call for a minute silence in respect to the Reading standings? Your call

Alert a moderator to this post

Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 23 Jun 20 6.19pm
Originally posted by Mapletree It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping But hey, some people simply don't understand why Black Lives Matter isn't All Lives Matter. Put simply, all lives do matter but it's black people whose lives have been treated as less important to date (since the 15th century) and need a greater focus. Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree. [Link] Did you read the article? If you did and are trying to push this to prove a point you're... well, best not. Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Nicholas91

The Democratic Republic of Kent 23 Jun 20 6.19pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping

Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree.

[Link]

Did you read the article? If you did and are trying to push this to prove a point you're... well, best not.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 23 Jun 20 6.23pm
It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping But hey, some people simply don't understand why Black Lives Matter isn't All Lives Matter. Put simply, all lives do matter but it's black people whose lives have been treated as less important to date (since the 15th century) and need a greater focus. Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree. [Link] Sir, you are not wrong to display this but I have felt for a long time that their cause would have been much better, and much more likely acceptable to a majority of people, if they had added one small word to the mix. That word is 'too'. There would be less ambiguity and the debate would have concentrated on the true issues rather than what lives had been 'ommitted'. However, the BAME hierarchy is always shooting itself in the foot: when Amber Rudd, in all innocence said how she felt for a black woman like Diane Abbot and the struggles she faces, rather than acknowledge her fellow MPs words she apparently chastised her for calling her 'black'. She is apparently a 'woman of colour'. "People of Colour Live's Matter" is not so catchy...As I said, it should have been 'Black Lives Matter Too'. hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.
Alert a moderator to this post

Behind Enemy Lines

Sussex 23 Jun 20 6.23pm

Send a Private Message to Behind Enemy Lines

It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping
But hey, some people simply don't understand why Black Lives Matter isn't All Lives Matter. Put simply, all lives do matter but it's black people whose lives have been treated as less important to date (since the 15th century) and need a greater focus.
Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree.
[Link]
Sir, you are not wrong to display this but I have felt for a long time that their cause would have been much better, and much more likely acceptable to a majority of people, if they had added one small word to the mix. That word is 'too'. There would be less ambiguity and the debate would have concentrated on the true issues rather than what lives had been 'ommitted'. However, the BAME hierarchy is always shooting itself in the foot: when Amber Rudd, in all innocence said how she felt for a black woman like Diane Abbot and the struggles she faces, rather than acknowledge her fellow MPs words she apparently chastised her for calling her 'black'. She is apparently a 'woman of colour'. "People of Colour Live's Matter" is not so catchy...As I said, it should have been 'Black Lives Matter Too'.

hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 23 Jun 20 6.42pm
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines It comes to something when you have to have a concept explained by Good Housekeeping But hey, some people simply don't understand why Black Lives Matter isn't All Lives Matter. Put simply, all lives do matter but it's black people whose lives have been treated as less important to date (since the 15th century) and need a greater focus. Here you are, absorb and then - as you always do - disagree. [Link] Sir, you are not wrong to display this but I have felt for a long time that their cause would have been much better, and much more likely acceptable to a majority of people, if they had added one small word to the mix. That word is 'too'. There would be less ambiguity and the debate would have concentrated on the true issues rather than what lives had been 'ommitted'. However, the BAME hierarchy is always shooting itself in the foot: when Amber Rudd, in all innocence said how she felt for a black woman like Diane Abbot and the struggles she faces, rather than acknowledge her fellow MPs words she apparently chastised her for calling her 'black'. She is apparently a 'woman of colour'. "People of Colour Live's Matter" is not so catchy...As I said, it should have been 'Black Lives Matter Too'. Good post. It is interesting the point regarding black/colour. In my lifetime I have been told not to call people black as they are coloureds, now it appears you can’t say coloured. I have a very good friend who is a Ghanaian body builder ( so what he says you just agree with), on one occasion I called someone “the coloured chap” he laughed and advised I could not say that as he is black. He did appreciate that, in the not too distant past, calling him coloured would have been the correct terminology
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 23 Jun 20 6.42pm

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

Good post. It is interesting the point regarding black/colour. In my lifetime I have been told not to call people black as they are coloureds, now it appears you can’t say coloured. I have a very good friend who is a Ghanaian body builder ( so what he says you just agree with), on one occasion I called someone “the coloured chap” he laughed and advised I could not say that as he is black. He did appreciate that, in the not too distant past, calling him coloured would have been the correct terminology

Alert a moderator to this post

Eaglecoops CR3 23 Jun 20 7.55pm
Originally posted by Spiderman Good post. It is interesting the point regarding black/colour. In my lifetime I have been told not to call people black as they are coloureds, now it appears you can’t say coloured. I have a very good friend who is a Ghanaian body builder ( so what he says you just agree with), on one occasion I called someone “the coloured chap” he laughed and advised I could not say that as he is black. He did appreciate that, in the not too distant past, calling him coloured would have been the correct terminology Unfortunately it would appear they change what they prefer to be called just as you are getting used to using the previous designation. It’s a very good way of constantly parking you in the slightly racist camp.
Alert a moderator to this post

Eaglecoops

CR3 23 Jun 20 7.55pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Unfortunately it would appear they change what they prefer to be called just as you are getting used to using the previous designation. It’s a very good way of constantly parking you in the slightly racist camp.

Alert a moderator to this post

Laszlo Panaflex 23 Jun 20 8.25pm
Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade?
Alert a moderator to this post

Laszlo Panaflex

23 Jun 20 8.25pm

Send a Private Message to Laszlo Panaflex

Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade?

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 23 Jun 20 8.29pm
Originally posted by Laszlo Panaflex Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade? The shovel got offended. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

23 Jun 20 8.29pm

Originally posted by Laszlo Panaflex

Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade?

The shovel got offended.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 23 Jun 20 8.30pm
Originally posted by Laszlo Panaflex Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade? The spade no longer identified as a spade. Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!
Alert a moderator to this post

Nicholas91

The Democratic Republic of Kent 23 Jun 20 8.30pm

Originally posted by Laszlo Panaflex

Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade?

The spade no longer identified as a spade.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 23 Jun 20 8.54pm
Originally posted by Nicholas91 The spade no longer identified as a spade. After spading. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

23 Jun 20 8.54pm

Originally posted by Nicholas91

The spade no longer identified as a spade.

After spading.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 23 Jun 20 9.16pm
Originally posted by Laszlo Panaflex Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade? "So what does all of this mean for people who want to, well, "call a spade a spade"? I urge caution." [Link] Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers
Alert a moderator to this post

Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Stoke sub normal 23 Jun 20 9.16pm

Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Originally posted by Laszlo Panaflex

Whatever happened to calling a spade a spade?

"So what does all of this mean for people who want to, well, "call a spade a spade"? I urge caution."

[Link]

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert a moderator to this post

Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 23 Jun 20 9.20pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays After spading. Spaying! Tut tut Must try harder. 10/10 Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers
Alert a moderator to this post

Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Stoke sub normal 23 Jun 20 9.20pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

After spading.

Spaying! Tut tut

Must try harder. 10/10

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert a moderator to this post

YT Oxford 23 Jun 20 9.28pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays The shovel got offended. Are we heading for Orwellian FORK crime? (hoe, hoe, hoe) Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)
Alert a moderator to this post

Oxford 23 Jun 20 9.28pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The shovel got offended.

Are we heading for Orwellian FORK crime? (hoe, hoe, hoe)

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 185 of 252 < 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Antifa call black man a Nazi and Racist

Site Map

Sponsors