You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > James O'Brien
April 24 2024 8.23pm

James O'Brien

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 17 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

 

View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 30 Jun 18 9.44pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

Not at all.
Stop being dumb.

I can cherry pick any line from a statement.
Isolate it
And criticise it.
Is it because I said 'you' or just the equal term.
C'mon TUX there is no mileage IMO in keep on blaming rich people for the woes of the bottom bit of society.
Life deals a hand
Some are impossible to play I will agree.
A lot are playable and it's just effort and time to get a better one.
Is the equation on tax take to rich people correct IYO. You have to try to protect this income surely.
And my equal bit by the way is what socialism deep down is all about.
Take from the rich.
Give to the poor
Bingo everyone the same
Got nuffink

That's metaphorical.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 30 Jun 18 10.08pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

Any good economy is driven by it's largest participants, the middle/working classes. The 'rich' add little in comparison to this group (despite the rants of the blinkered).
Stop raping the economic drivers. Simple.

OK, who are the rich you referring to? A salary of £70,000 in the UK puts you in the top 5 per cent of earners.

The top 1% pay over a quarter of all the income tax the government gets. If these people did not exist then everyone else has to match that amount – or the govt income reduces significantly. The top 1% already pay more than their fair share.

Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View leifandersonshair's Profile leifandersonshair Flag Newport 30 Jun 18 10.40pm Send a Private Message to leifandersonshair Add leifandersonshair as a friend

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

OK, who are the rich you referring to? A salary of £70,000 in the UK puts you in the top 5 per cent of earners.

The top 1% pay over a quarter of all the income tax the government gets. If these people did not exist then everyone else has to match that amount – or the govt income reduces significantly. The top 1% already pay more than their fair share.

Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich!

Technically true- but this is for Income tax only, which makes up just a quarter of the total tax revenue. It should be noted that the top 1% have benefited disproportionately from, for example, the cuts in corporation tax, property taxes etc.

Oh, and the old "Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich" line? Lazy. Here's another equally broad and lazy line- 'capitalism privatises profits and socialises losses'.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 30 Jun 18 10.58pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by leifandersonshair

Technically true- but this is for Income tax only, which makes up just a quarter of the total tax revenue. It should be noted that the top 1% have benefited disproportionately from, for example, the cuts in corporation tax, property taxes etc.

Oh, and the old "Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich" line? Lazy. Here's another equally broad and lazy line- 'capitalism privatises profits and socialises losses'.

Yes they have benefited from corp tax cuts etc but that's not the point really.
They have only benefited because they're in a position to.
Is that a reason to want more and more
the point of this bit of the thread is about what they pay, not what they get back or don't pay.
They still pay a massive amount pro rata than most of us. Greed causes issues and resentment and in isolation is a bad trait. Rich people don't want to be a pound less rich tomorrow I get that but as said they pay loads.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 30 Jun 18 11.39pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by leifandersonshair

Technically true- but this is for Income tax only, which makes up just a quarter of the total tax revenue. It should be noted that the top 1% have benefited disproportionately from, for example, the cuts in corporation tax, property taxes etc.

Oh, and the old "Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich" line? Lazy. Here's another equally broad and lazy line- 'capitalism privatises profits and socialises losses'.

And NI accounts for about 20% of total tax revenue, which combined with income tax is 45%.

What happens when corporation tax goes down? Companies invest the savings into the business by employing more staff, buying more product and investing into more innovation, plus wages go up.

It's a waste of time explaining economics to a socialist. To cut to the chase, just show me some countries that are thriving economically under socialism. It does not work otherwise everyone would be doing it.

Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Jun 2018 11.43pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jun 18 11.58pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

The only countries that remain socialist are dictatorships.

The proof is in the eating.....the only democratic countries that elect socialist governments are ones that haven't had them for decades.....enough time for youth, who have never experienced a socialist government to get to voting age.

They are easily fooled and believe the promises socialists put out. Enough of them are ignorant of history so they actually believe it.

There is actually hope for socialism in the future once automation has radically changed the workforce enough for the capitalist system to have to consider a change.

But it will have to be a part of the new system....not the actual system itself.......both traditional capitalism and socialism will be outmoded solutions in of themselves.

But for now....it's the last thing any sane country votes for.

Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Jul 2018 2.16am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Flag Oxford 01 Jul 18 6.55am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by leifandersonshair

Technically true- but this is for Income tax only, which makes up just a quarter of the total tax revenue. It should be noted that the top 1% have benefited disproportionately from, for example, the cuts in corporation tax, property taxes etc.

Oh, and the old "Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich" line? Lazy. Here's another equally broad and lazy line- 'capitalism privatises profits and socialises losses'.

Please name some UK property taxes and explain which ones have been cut. Genuine request, as I don’t know the answer.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 01 Jul 18 7.46am

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

OK, who are the rich you referring to? A salary of £70,000 in the UK puts you in the top 5 per cent of earners.

The top 1% pay over a quarter of all the income tax the government gets. If these people did not exist then everyone else has to match that amount – or the govt income reduces significantly. The top 1% already pay more than their fair share.

Socialists would rather everyone be poor than some people be rich!

As a percentage of your(my) income, you(i) pay far far more in tax than 'the rich' ever will........yet you talk about ''fairness''?
It baffles me why many continually ignore this fact.

As for Socialism (zzzzzz), you live in that world whether you choose to accept it or not. Bank bail-outs/ins, Working Tax Credits etc etc are all paid for by YOU for the benefit of those wealthier than YOU.
Who tells you that you need rich people? Rich people.
Along with many you've been indoctrinated. You just can't see it.

"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled".


 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 01 Jul 18 8.16am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

As a percentage of your(my) income, you(i) pay far far more in tax than 'the rich' ever will........yet you talk about ''fairness''?
It baffles me why many continually ignore this fact.

As for Socialism (zzzzzz), you live in that world whether you choose to accept it or not. Bank bail-outs/ins, Working Tax Credits etc etc are all paid for by YOU for the benefit of those wealthier than YOU.
Who tells you that you need rich people? Rich people.
Along with many you've been indoctrinated. You just can't see it.

"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled".

But in cash that's still a ton more than me and I'm ok with that.
What about a certain group in the workforce that declare a false amount and still get rebates.
Then moan about NI being put up.
Now that is a scandal in itself don't you think.
At least the rich are paying.


Edited by Penge Eagle (01 Jul 2018 12.11pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 01 Jul 18 12.10pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

As a percentage of your(my) income, you(i) pay far far more in tax than 'the rich' ever will........yet you talk about ''fairness''?
It baffles me why many continually ignore this fact.

As for Socialism (zzzzzz), you live in that world whether you choose to accept it or not. Bank bail-outs/ins, Working Tax Credits etc etc are all paid for by YOU for the benefit of those wealthier than YOU.
Who tells you that you need rich people? Rich people.
Along with many you've been indoctrinated. You just can't see it.

"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled".

I really can't see how this is the case. So in order to answer you, who exactly are "the rich" and what are they earning? Can you give me example figures of the tax paying differences of a rich vs poor person? Would LOVE to know your ideal tax brackets.

As for the bailouts, a true capitalist would have let the banks go to the wall and new banks come in to take their place. If the banks knew the government would step in to save them, would they have been so reckless? The government was supposed to keep the banks in check and failed – and you want the government to control your finances under socialism?

I know how the capitalist and socialist systems work and don't need a rich person to tell me which is the better system. Again, give me a list of countries thriving under socialism.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 01 Jul 18 8.04pm

Originally posted by cryrst

But in cash that's still a ton more than me and I'm ok with that.
What about a certain group in the workforce that declare a false amount and still get rebates.
Then moan about NI being put up.
Now that is a scandal in itself don't you think.
At least the rich are paying.


Edited by Penge Eagle (01 Jul 2018 12.11pm)

I never doubted it.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 01 Jul 18 8.23pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

I really can't see how this is the case. So in order to answer you, who exactly are "the rich" and what are they earning? Can you give me example figures of the tax paying differences of a rich vs poor person? Would LOVE to know your ideal tax brackets.

As for the bailouts, a true capitalist would have let the banks go to the wall and new banks come in to take their place. If the banks knew the government would step in to save them, would they have been so reckless? The government was supposed to keep the banks in check and failed – and you want the government to control your finances under socialism?

I know how the capitalist and socialist systems work and don't need a rich person to tell me which is the better system. Again, give me a list of countries thriving under socialism.

Socialism, Socialism, Socialism............zzzzzzz. If you can't see that i'm far from that then best we end this conversation as friends bud.
All the best

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 7 of 17 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > James O'Brien