VAR trial in the Premier League HUD v PAL
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 bexleydave  Barnehurst 07 Sep 18 11.26am |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Some thought it was an acceptable challenge as it was Zaha! I kid you not. They've become another Brighton; soon they'll have 100+ page threads dedicated to him. I could make a case for them swapping life chairman with the Weed though
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Isley46 Sanderstead 11 Sep 18 3.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'VAR testing at Selhurst' by bexleydave VAR has been in test at Selhurst this afternoon. Great experience for the Riddlesdown Collegiate Boys. #riddlesdownfootball pic.twitter.com/qtRjnKjiT9
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| braunstoneagle the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 11 Sep 18 4.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
good, i want VAR in the PL. you just know our gameplan will be to get wilf on the ball in the box as often as possible
‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| CrazyBadger Ware 17 Sep 18 10.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
I presume after all the Zaha furore, VAR was not used on Saturday?!
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bangell Oxford 17 Sep 18 10.26am |
|
|---|---|
|
Apparently Sane's disallowed goal against Fulham is the only decision that would have been overturned [Link]
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 becky over the moon 17 Sep 18 11.18am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
I presume after all the Zaha furore, VAR was not used on Saturday?! VAR was being tested, but there was no reference to it from the pitch - presumably they were just checking out cameras and back room stuff.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Willo Online South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Sep 18 11.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by becky
VAR was being tested, but there was no reference to it from the pitch - presumably they were just checking out cameras and back room stuff. My understanding is that they were testing the technological capacity to deal with a busy Saturday schedule.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 17 Sep 18 11.31am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bangell
Apparently Sane's disallowed goal against Fulham is the only decision that would have been overturned [Link] I wonder what was wrong with our disallowed goal.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 17 Sep 18 12.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chris123
I wonder what was wrong with our disallowed goal. Ok I admit that I may be biased but I couldn't see anything wrong with it.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BuckinghamshireEagle 17 Sep 18 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It was a highly dubious decision to disallow the goal, but not a clear and obvious error. It would therefore not have stood, even with VAR in use.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo Online South coast - west of Brighton. 17 Sep 18 12.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What we have to be mindful off is that the VAR will not advise a referee to review an incident etc etc if in the opinion of the VAR it is not a "Clear and obvious error" but of course this is very subjective and open to debate. At the end of the day VAR is not a panacea - where subjectivity is present there will always be polarised views amongst supporters.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lyons550 Shirley 17 Sep 18 12.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
What we have to be mindful off is that the VAR will not advise a referee to review an incident etc etc if in the opinion of the VAR it is not a "Clear and obvious error" but of course this is very subjective and open to debate. At the end of the day VAR is not a panacea - where subjectivity is present there will always be polarised views amongst supporters. With that in mind...VAR should be consulted EVERY TIME the ball is in the back of the net with the obvious question "is there any reason why it CANT be given?"
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.