At least you are always good for a laugh or two. That comment actually made me laugh out loud. In any contest to determine who is least connected to reality on this forum there would undoubtedly be a few outstanding contenders. However, you would likely be odds on to win. I wouldn't bet against you for sure!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The same Spectator that’s owned by the Telegraph?
Here’s an article from the Spectator that supports Russia Today as it doesn’t deal in fake news:
[Link]
Maybe it’s an attempt at humour? If so, it passed me by.

Tim Pool I don’t know about, but here’s an article exaggerating a situation and making a claim disputed by the police.
[Link]

You can argue the toss about these specifics. My point is, we should view all media with suspicion. The more political they are, the more suspicion I view them with.

Vive le Roy!

Brexit has now developed into Civil War,and the Guardian,Blair,O'Brien et al are in open rebellion.
They had better watch out because the loses in Civil Wars tend to end up being topped.Who's for public executions?

Interpretation? They followed him out.....It's viewable in the video....Looks pretty plain to me....of course if you want to think they just happened to be going in the same direction.

Regardless.....as I said, there isn't really any reason to doubt the few sources that I do actually give credence too.

I may differ with Pool on some of his politics but I've found him to be very fair.....I can recommend him to you.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Errrr....not sure that I'm stopping them.

I'm laughing at examples from a particular source.....My links picked out the ridiculousness of them.

If you think Tim Pool's reporting is comparable you are welcome to that view.....It'll be something else to laugh at.

As Elon Musk correctly pointed out....some media sources are better than others.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

You take a position.

Relativism is an inch away from nihilism. I don't believe either is 'useful' outside of the theoretical.

Word play is semantics. All words are conceptual.

Of course not everything written in the Guardian is nonsense by a long mark.....However, some of it is....This is my 'interpretation'.

We could discuss philosophy or we could discuss who are the more objective new sources from an objective and empirical sense.

There is no requirement to agree......Some people in Africa still practice witchcraft, some people don't. Choice is paramount to both.

I make the choice to laugh at witchcraft for obvious reasons...Similarly I make the choice to laugh at this Guardian article.

Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Sep 2018 8.39pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)