Gay cake
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 rob1969  Banstead Surrey 10 Oct 18 3.26pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
It wasn't a couple, it was an "activist". And it cost the taxpayers an arm and a leg, not him. "Questions will now be asked as to whether the Equality Commission was right to spend more than Ł250,000 of public money on this case." As I typed the last sentance I did wonder if we - the tax payers- were paying but then discounted it. Someone at the Equality Commission.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| YT Oxford 10 Oct 18 5.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by rob1969
Slightly different. What is surprising is that the couple concerned made such an issue of it. There are other bakers! Some people are unbelievable full of their own importance and sense of entitlement. Hope the case cost them an arm and leg No!!! Don’t say that. Before you know it they’ll be trying to order a cake that promotes disability rights.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 10 Oct 18 5.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
What an absolute bloody farce.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 10 Oct 18 5.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
What an absolute bloody farce. You think the gay cake buyers should have won the case?
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 10 Oct 18 6.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by YT
You think the gay cake buyers should have won the case? From what I've deduced from TUX's general stance on the HOL, I'd suggest he sees it as a criminal waste of time and money. Not for me to speak for other posters, of course, but that's the sensible interpretation.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
johnno42000  10 Oct 18 6.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Next thing you know you'll have people arguing if liking fish sticks is gay.
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 10 Oct 18 6.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
From what I've deduced from TUX's general stance on the HOL, I'd suggest he sees it as a criminal waste of time and money. Not for me to speak for other posters, of course, but that's the sensible interpretation. Nicely dealt with and thankyou bud
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| elgrande bedford 10 Oct 18 7.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I agree common sense has won in the end,but I do wonder if they had gone in to a Muslim bakery if it had even made the news.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 10 Oct 18 7.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
I agree common sense has won in the end,but I do wonder if they had gone in to a Muslim bakery if it had even made the news. why? don't gay's like a rum baba?
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 10 Oct 18 8.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
I agree common sense has won in the end,but I do wonder if they had gone in to a Muslim bakery if it had even made the news. I don’t understand your point. Do you mean that a Muslim baker wouldn’t have been prosecuted for refusing to decorate a cake with a pro-gay marriage message whereas a Christian baker was? Why do you think that? I agree with you that the ruling is common sense. If it had gone the other way (ooh er missus) a Christian baker wouldn’t be able to refuse a Muslim who wanted a cake that said “The Pope is a Cvnt” and a Muslim baker wouldn’t be able to refuse a Christian who wanted a cake that said “Mohammed svcks boys” etc etc
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 10 Oct 18 8.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by YT
I don’t understand your point. Do you mean that a Muslim baker wouldn’t have been prosecuted for refusing to decorate a cake with a pro-gay marriage message whereas a Christian baker was? Why do you think that? I agree with you that the ruling is common sense. If it had gone the other way (ooh er missus) a Christian baker wouldn’t be able to refuse a Muslim who wanted a cake that said “The Pope is a Cvnt” and a Muslim baker wouldn’t be able to refuse a Christian who wanted a cake that said “Mohammed svcks boys” etc etc In the interest of research, I think both your cake suggestions might be tested.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 10 Oct 18 8.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
In the interest of research, I think both your cake suggestions might be tested. Chill out snowflake. You've tried reporting people for less.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.