Clubs to give Scudamore 250K each

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

chris123 hove actually 14 Nov 18 6.17pm
Originally posted by Painter Premier Chairmen are his employers! It's private company though
Alert a moderator to this post

chris123

hove actually 14 Nov 18 6.17pm

Originally posted by Painter

Premier Chairmen are his employers!

It's private company though

Alert a moderator to this post

Plumpton eagle East Sussex 14 Nov 18 6.19pm
Man does job well, gets paid millions; millionaires ask other millionaires to give more millions to millionaire for making them millions. The payment is probably just to say well done for lasting that long without getting caught spit-roasting a hooker with Sepp Blatter. ________________________________________________ Taylors lovechild - you have summed it up brilliantly. Palace's Ł250k equates to about 500 season tickets. So about 500 of us have actually paid for his going away present. Excellent!
Alert a moderator to this post

Plumpton eagle

East Sussex 14 Nov 18 6.19pm

Send a Private Message to Plumpton eagle

Man does job well, gets paid millions; millionaires ask other millionaires to give more millions to millionaire for making them millions. The payment is probably just to say well done for lasting that long without getting caught spit-roasting a hooker with Sepp Blatter.
________________________________________________

Taylors lovechild - you have summed it up brilliantly. Palace's Ł250k equates to about 500 season tickets. So about 500 of us have actually paid for his going away present. Excellent!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk Top half 14 Nov 18 6.25pm
Originally posted by the despotic banana At the end of last season, it was reported that only 4 PL clubs were paying all staff the living wage. Richard Scudamore's salary package was worth in excess of Ł2.5m last year. But, yeah, let's bung him an extra Ł250k each. Edited by the despotic banana (14 Nov 2018 5.43pm) Yep, I'd rather we shared out that amount between all the non-playing and executive staff at the club. Optimistic as ever
Alert a moderator to this post

Stuk

Top half 14 Nov 18 6.25pm

Originally posted by the despotic banana

At the end of last season, it was reported that only 4 PL clubs were paying all staff the living wage.

Richard Scudamore's salary package was worth in excess of Ł2.5m last year.

But, yeah, let's bung him an extra Ł250k each.

Edited by the despotic banana (14 Nov 2018 5.43pm)

Yep, I'd rather we shared out that amount between all the non-playing and executive staff at the club.

Optimistic as ever

Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11 Beckenham 14 Nov 18 6.53pm
If Scudamore is such a great negotiator why didn't he negotiate a better pay deal with bonuses. He has been in the job long enough. One more point
Alert a moderator to this post

Badger11

Beckenham 14 Nov 18 6.53pm

If Scudamore is such a great negotiator why didn't he negotiate a better pay deal with bonuses. He has been in the job long enough.

One more point

Alert a moderator to this post

Bexley Eagle Bexley Kent 14 Nov 18 10.40pm
It’s laughable really. We should tell them to do one and then bung club staff a Xmas bonus instead. The guys on 2.5 mil a year and has been for donkeys. 5mil neither here nor there to him
Alert a moderator to this post

Bexley Eagle

Bexley Kent 14 Nov 18 10.40pm

It’s laughable really. We should tell them to do one and then bung club staff a Xmas bonus instead. The guys on 2.5 mil a year and has been for donkeys. 5mil neither here nor there to him

Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider London 15 Nov 18 12.24am
Football has changed so much since the birth of the premier league and sky. TV coverage is immeasurably better. The live attending experience is very different but probably better. The sport overall has successfully encouraged female inclusion. Financially, football clubs have become significantly more valuable largely due to sky and sky has become significantly more valuable largely due to its viewers. People like me, who follow football live and on sky and bt get clobbered financially like never before, but Iam getting a greater experience than ever before. Albeit very different. I used to love the terraces and the ‘Big Match’ as much as I do the seats and sky, maybe more. But Istill love the whole new experience. Jimmy Hill, bovril, pipes smoking, rattles, trouble, police in the grounds, much more exciting football because there were so many more mistakes, more goals, far more goalmouth action, less fit players, more mud, frost and snow. Far more gnarly. Ultimately now, we the viewers are the ones who are funding it all. About 80% sky and 20% live, plus of course sponsors and advertisers. Peter Scudamore has played a large part in commercialising the game to move with the way of the world which we are all paying for. Giving him Ł5M golden handshake, or Ł250k per club is such a small fraction of the overall pie I am more than happy for him to have it. I love the tv coverage I get. All women fans should offer to double his handout. He has opened the game up for them. Overall he has helped put football up on its current platform. Leader of sport globally by a country mile. Costing us all a fortune but what isn’t.
Alert a moderator to this post

dreamwaverider

London 15 Nov 18 12.24am

Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider

Football has changed so much since the birth of the premier league and sky. TV coverage is immeasurably better. The live attending experience is very different but probably better. The sport overall has successfully encouraged female inclusion.
Financially, football clubs have become significantly more valuable largely due to sky and sky has become significantly more valuable largely due to its viewers.
People like me, who follow football live and on sky and bt get clobbered financially like never before, but Iam getting a greater experience than ever before. Albeit very different.
I used to love the terraces and the ‘Big Match’ as much as I do the seats and sky, maybe more. But Istill love the whole new experience.
Jimmy Hill, bovril, pipes smoking, rattles, trouble, police in the grounds, much more exciting football because there were so many more mistakes, more goals, far more goalmouth action, less fit players, more mud, frost and snow. Far more gnarly.
Ultimately now, we the viewers are the ones who are funding it all. About 80% sky and 20% live, plus of course sponsors and advertisers.
Peter Scudamore has played a large part in commercialising the game to move with the way of the world which we are all paying for. Giving him Ł5M golden handshake, or Ł250k per club is such a small fraction of the overall pie I am more than happy for him to have it.
I love the tv coverage I get. All women fans should offer to double his handout. He has opened the game up for them.
Overall he has helped put football up on its current platform. Leader of sport globally by a country mile.
Costing us all a fortune but what isn’t.

Alert a moderator to this post

becky over the moon 15 Nov 18 8.02am
Originally posted by dreamwaverider Football has changed so much since the birth of the premier league and sky. TV coverage is immeasurably better. The live attending experience is very different but probably better. The sport overall has successfully encouraged female inclusion. Financially, football clubs have become significantly more valuable largely due to sky and sky has become significantly more valuable largely due to its viewers. People like me, who follow football live and on sky and bt get clobbered financially like never before, but Iam getting a greater experience than ever before. Albeit very different. I used to love the terraces and the ‘Big Match’ as much as I do the seats and sky, maybe more. But Istill love the whole new experience. Jimmy Hill, bovril, pipes smoking, rattles, trouble, police in the grounds, much more exciting football because there were so many more mistakes, more goals, far more goalmouth action, less fit players, more mud, frost and snow. Far more gnarly. Ultimately now, we the viewers are the ones who are funding it all. About 80% sky and 20% live, plus of course sponsors and advertisers. Peter Scudamore has played a large part in commercialising the game to move with the way of the world which we are all paying for. Giving him Ł5M golden handshake, or Ł250k per club is such a small fraction of the overall pie I am more than happy for him to have it. I love the tv coverage I get. All women fans should offer to double his handout. He has opened the game up for them. Overall he has helped put football up on its current platform. Leader of sport globally by a country mile. Costing us all a fortune but what isn’t. How in heaven's name did you come up with that? As a woman who has supported Palace (along with a number of other female cousins/wives/daughters of cousins, we have been there since the 1950's without any problem. We certainly didn't need the benefits of tv to 'open the game up' to us, and neither did the considerable number of women who sat around me in the LH from the time the new stand was built. Unless, of course you are talking about women playing football, which is a whole different thing! A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers
Alert a moderator to this post \| Board Moderator

becky

over the moon 15 Nov 18 8.02am

Originally posted by dreamwaverider

Football has changed so much since the birth of the premier league and sky. TV coverage is immeasurably better. The live attending experience is very different but probably better. The sport overall has successfully encouraged female inclusion.
Financially, football clubs have become significantly more valuable largely due to sky and sky has become significantly more valuable largely due to its viewers.
People like me, who follow football live and on sky and bt get clobbered financially like never before, but Iam getting a greater experience than ever before. Albeit very different.
I used to love the terraces and the ‘Big Match’ as much as I do the seats and sky, maybe more. But Istill love the whole new experience.
Jimmy Hill, bovril, pipes smoking, rattles, trouble, police in the grounds, much more exciting football because there were so many more mistakes, more goals, far more goalmouth action, less fit players, more mud, frost and snow. Far more gnarly.
Ultimately now, we the viewers are the ones who are funding it all. About 80% sky and 20% live, plus of course sponsors and advertisers.
Peter Scudamore has played a large part in commercialising the game to move with the way of the world which we are all paying for. Giving him Ł5M golden handshake, or Ł250k per club is such a small fraction of the overall pie I am more than happy for him to have it.
I love the tv coverage I get. All women fans should offer to double his handout. He has opened the game up for them.
Overall he has helped put football up on its current platform. Leader of sport globally by a country mile.
Costing us all a fortune but what isn’t.

How in heaven's name did you come up with that?

As a woman who has supported Palace (along with a number of other female cousins/wives/daughters of cousins, we have been there since the 1950's without any problem. We certainly didn't need the benefits of tv to 'open the game up' to us, and neither did the considerable number of women who sat around me in the LH from the time the new stand was built.

Unless, of course you are talking about women playing football, which is a whole different thing!

A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator

the despotic banana Dept. of Baboon Maintenance 15 Nov 18 9.02am
Originally posted by dreamwaverider All women fans... Or "gash", as Scudamore calls them. Ask me about Ronald de Boer.
Alert a moderator to this post

the despotic banana

Dept. of Baboon Maintenance 15 Nov 18 9.02am

Send a Private Message to the despotic banana

Originally posted by dreamwaverider
All women fans...

Or "gash", as Scudamore calls them.

Ask me about Ronald de Boer.

Alert a moderator to this post

Nobbybm Dartford 15 Nov 18 12.51pm
Saw something on t***ter earlier that said we were one of five clubs that have (so far) refused to pay. Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!
Alert a moderator to this post

Nobbybm

Dartford 15 Nov 18 12.51pm

Saw something on t***ter earlier that said we were one of five clubs that have (so far) refused to pay.

Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!

Alert a moderator to this post

the despotic banana Dept. of Baboon Maintenance 15 Nov 18 2.00pm
Originally posted by Nobbybm Saw something on t**ter earlier that said we were one of five clubs that have (so far) refused to pay. That's our January transfer budget for a new striker in its entirety, that is. Either that, or money to spend on pies with which to lure Neil Shipperley out of retirement. Ask me about Ronald de Boer.*
Alert a moderator to this post

the despotic banana

Dept. of Baboon Maintenance 15 Nov 18 2.00pm

Originally posted by Nobbybm

Saw something on t***ter earlier that said we were one of five clubs that have (so far) refused to pay.

That's our January transfer budget for a new striker in its entirety, that is.

Either that, or money to spend on pies with which to lure Neil Shipperley out of retirement.

Ask me about Ronald de Boer.

Alert a moderator to this post