Who’s at fault - Hodgson or the board? - Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website

Who’s at fault - Hodgson or the board?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 72 of 72 << First < 68 69 70 71 72

Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Jan 19 8.52am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle Parish has gone on record as saying that there isn't a downside which I assume meant that he could get a good fee for him if he didn't work out here Our business decisions on players aren’t turning out to be very good ones, and that’s because the scouting or decision makers aren’t up to the job. Murray and Meyer spring to mind and a lot of this stems from ex Palace players without the experience or ability making them. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 31 Jan 19 8.52am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Parish has gone on record as saying that there isn't a downside which I assume meant that he could get a good fee for him if he didn't work out here

Our business decisions on players aren’t turning out to be very good ones, and that’s because the scouting or decision makers aren’t up to the job. Murray and Meyer spring to mind and a lot of this stems from ex Palace players without the experience or ability making them.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Jan 19 8.56am
Originally posted by Maine Eagle It’s a bit of both. In Hodgsons post game comments he seemed to me to have a dig at parish and freedman over transfers. You have to wonder about someone like Meyer, he clearly isn’t fancied by the manager so why did we sign him? Parish thought, it’s a free, so no downside. What would be better would be giving the manager the players he wants to play in his side, As for Hodgson he really is a mixed bag. He is terribly predictable and just cannot make decsisve personnel or tactical changes during games which is terribly frustrating as we lose points from winning positions time and again. I’m bored with Hodgson but it won’t be forever, or will it? Parish would love it to be. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 31 Jan 19 8.56am

Originally posted by Maine Eagle

It’s a bit of both.

In Hodgsons post game comments he seemed to me to have a dig at parish and freedman over transfers. You have to wonder about someone like Meyer, he clearly isn’t fancied by the manager so why did we sign him? Parish thought, it’s a free, so no downside. What would be better would be giving the manager the players he wants to play in his side,

As for Hodgson he really is a mixed bag. He is terribly predictable and just cannot make decsisve personnel or tactical changes during games which is terribly frustrating as we lose points from winning positions time and again.

I’m bored with Hodgson but it won’t be forever, or will it? Parish would love it to be.

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Maine Eagle USA 31 Jan 19 1.07pm
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle Parish has gone on record as saying that there isn't a downside which I assume meant that he could get a good fee for him if he didn't work out here Trying to command a nice fee for a player bereft of confidence who hasn’t played much might be harder than Parish thinks, and Meyer will do a Riedewald and reject any kind of club he doesn’t fancy. The downside to signing players the manager doesn’t fancy is it never works out. Meyer has to hope a new manager comes in over the summer for a fresh start. Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.
Alert a moderator to this post

Maine Eagle

USA 31 Jan 19 1.07pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Parish has gone on record as saying that there isn't a downside which I assume meant that he could get a good fee for him if he didn't work out here

Trying to command a nice fee for a player bereft of confidence who hasn’t played much might be harder than Parish thinks, and Meyer will do a Riedewald and reject any kind of club he doesn’t fancy.

The downside to signing players the manager doesn’t fancy is it never works out. Meyer has to hope a new manager comes in over the summer for a fresh start.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

Alert a moderator to this post

Maine Eagle USA 31 Jan 19 1.10pm
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman I’m bored with Hodgson but it won’t be forever, or will it? Parish would love it to be. I don’t think Hodgson will be fired. If it becomes fairly nailed on that we are going down, AND there is enough time left to make a change and actually turn it around, then it’s still only a maybe. This would be handled more like Pardew than FDB - long drawn out affair with the sacking coming far too late. However if Hodgson retires - not an Allardyce type retirement, but a real one, then anything is possible. Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.
Alert a moderator to this post

Maine Eagle

USA 31 Jan 19 1.10pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

I’m bored with Hodgson but it won’t be forever, or will it? Parish would love it to be.

I don’t think Hodgson will be fired.

If it becomes fairly nailed on that we are going down, AND there is enough time left to make a change and actually turn it around, then it’s still only a maybe.

This would be handled more like Pardew than FDB - long drawn out affair with the sacking coming far too late.

However if Hodgson retires - not an Allardyce type retirement, but a real one, then anything is possible.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

Alert a moderator to this post

jeeagles 31 Jan 19 4.38pm
How many times after a game can he say: "I thought we deserved 3 points today"
Alert a moderator to this post

jeeagles

31 Jan 19 4.38pm

How many times after a game can he say:

"I thought we deserved 3 points today"

Alert a moderator to this post

ARGILE OLD GEEZER PORTIMAO 01 Feb 19 8.13am
Originally posted by ChrisGC Well said. You would say that with your narrow view, as i said to you, there is more to international football than just tournaments,but you cam only judge him on tournaments. I already proved to you that his OVERALL record as manager of England is the 4th best of 17, but you keep reverting back to his tournament record because you can't accept that you were proved wrong when you said "he is the worst manager England ever had"
Alert a moderator to this post

ARGILE OLD GEEZER

PORTIMAO 01 Feb 19 8.13am

Send a Private Message to ARGILE OLD GEEZER

Originally posted by ChrisGC

Well said.

You would say that with your narrow view, as i said to you, there is more to international football than just tournaments,but you cam only judge him on tournaments.
I already proved to you that his OVERALL record as manager of England is the 4th best of 17, but you keep reverting back to his tournament record because you can't accept that you were proved wrong when you said "he is the worst manager England ever had"

Alert a moderator to this post

Painter Croydon 01 Feb 19 8.49am
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman I’m bored with Hodgson but it won’t be forever, or will it? Parish would love it to be. You maybe bored with Hodgson, but the majority aren’t.
Alert a moderator to this post

Painter

Croydon 01 Feb 19 8.49am

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

I’m bored with Hodgson but it won’t be forever, or will it? Parish would love it to be.

You maybe bored with Hodgson, but the majority aren’t.

Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC Wantage 01 Feb 19 9.35am
Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER You would say that with your narrow view, as i said to you, there is more to international football than just tournaments,but you cam only judge him on tournaments. I already proved to you that his OVERALL record as manager of England is the 4th best of 17, but you keep reverting back to his tournament record because you can't accept that you were proved wrong when you said "he is the worst manager England ever had" No you didn't. You excluded managers to manipulate the figures to support your inaccurate statement. Even so, you could only get him to 4th, which is a big climb down from the best ever. As for narrow views, that's a bit rich coming from someone so single minded about Hodgson being a superb manager when empirically, he isn't. Edited by Midlands Eagle (17 Aug 2019 5.42am)
Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC

Wantage 01 Feb 19 9.35am

Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER

No you didn't. You excluded managers to manipulate the figures to support your inaccurate statement.

Even so, you could only get him to 4th, which is a big climb down from the best ever.

As for narrow views, that's a bit rich coming from someone so single minded about Hodgson being a superb manager when empirically, he isn't.

Edited by Midlands Eagle (17 Aug 2019 5.42am)

Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC Wantage 01 Feb 19 9.49am
Originally posted by Painter You maybe bored with Hodgson, but the majority aren’t. What are you basing that on? The more vociferous posters might be shouting down all opinion to the contrary on here, but that doesn't necessarily translate to overall majority satisfaction. If he wasn't forced to change the lineup Vs Fulham because of Wilf's suspension it would be the same line up and tactics as against Southampton. As it is, I don't expect Ayew or PVA are in any danger of being benched. And as for the Schlupp on 75 minutes no matter what 'tactic'? How's that going to play in the Fulham training meetings? "We know Roy is going to do this, so what do we do?" "Nothing gaffa, it's totally ineffectual" Sorted, that was easy lads. That said, he'll probably start now Wilf's out, wouldn't put it past him.
Alert a moderator to this post

ChrisGC

Wantage 01 Feb 19 9.49am

Originally posted by Painter

You maybe bored with Hodgson, but the majority aren’t.

What are you basing that on? The more vociferous posters might be shouting down all opinion to the contrary on here, but that doesn't necessarily translate to overall majority satisfaction.

If he wasn't forced to change the lineup Vs Fulham because of Wilf's suspension it would be the same line up and tactics as against Southampton. As it is, I don't expect Ayew or PVA are in any danger of being benched.

And as for the Schlupp on 75 minutes no matter what 'tactic'? How's that going to play in the Fulham training meetings?

"We know Roy is going to do this, so what do we do?"
"Nothing gaffa, it's totally ineffectual"
Sorted, that was easy lads.

That said, he'll probably start now Wilf's out, wouldn't put it past him.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 72 of 72 << First < 68 69 70 71 72

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Who’s at fault - Hodgson or the board?

Site Map

Sponsors