Tyrone Mings
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Willo  South coast - west of Brighton. 04 Feb 19 6.48pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Bit like you defending the indefensible (Clattenburg). I don't care about Capoue's previous record, his assault on Zaha was premeditated and vicious. Deeney basically admitted they set out to get Zaha. Please don't try and defend the thugs that are Watford With the greatest of respect, I fail to comprehend how you have concluded that I am defending Watford. All I asserted what that in all probability it was the Watford supporters who were defending their player after the accusations against him. Edited by Willo (04 Feb 2019 6.50pm)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| gerry theagle newbury 04 Feb 19 6.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Just heard on BBC South Today sports news that the FA are taking no action against Mings, Wilf will probably be hung drawn and quartered. Justice is not a word in their book.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 04 Feb 19 6.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by gerry theagle
Just heard on BBC South Today sports news that the FA are taking no action against Mings, Wilf will probably be hung drawn and quartered. Justice is not a word in their book. Only Mings will know if there was any intent.From my perspective having looked at the footage it is inconclusive.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ChrisGC Wantage 04 Feb 19 8.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by gerry theagle
Just heard on BBC South Today sports news that the FA are taking no action against Mings, Wilf will probably be hung drawn and quartered. Justice is not a word in their book. Outrageous. Clear as day. Completely unnatural action, stamping down and behind him. Did the bloke in broad daylight and on camera and got away with it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ChrisGC Wantage 04 Feb 19 8.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Probably just defending their player. How did I miss this. Did you just defend a thug's actions because of their good record in one breath and then in the next say not to judge Mings on his previous? You also state that you'd decided he couldn't have done it based on his reported charity work before you'd even seen it. I'd be worried to see you on a jury, deciding innocence and guilt based on whether you like what you heard about someone rather than the evidence!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 04 Feb 19 8.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ChrisGC
How did I miss this. Did you just defend a thug's actions because of their good record in one breath and then in the next say not to judge Mings on his previous? You also state that you'd decided he couldn't have done it based on his reported charity work before you'd even seen it. I'd be worried to see you on a jury, deciding innocence and guilt based on whether you like what you heard about someone rather than the evidence! I have not defended any action at all,merely stating that the evidence is inconclusive.So YES, I have looked at the evidence. As you mentioned 'Jury', I would like to point out that the jurors are not given details of any 'Previous' of the accused so as not to influence their decision.I was just advocating that the FA should not be influenced by the Mings incident with Ibrahimovic. I have made my views on this patently clear and stand 'Four square' by my comments.I really don't feel minded to add any more nor respond to comments which mis-interpret my message. Edited by Willo (04 Feb 2019 9.04pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stuckinbristol In the woodwork. 04 Feb 19 9.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Watching the video I would say at best Mings has done little to avoid this, and it actually looks like he has broken stride to make sure there is contact.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
crvenaeagle  12 Feb 19 12.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Only Mings will know if there was any intent.From my perspective having looked at the footage it is inconclusive. Oh stop trying to come off high and mighty about this mate. If the broken stride to land on Oliviera's face isn't evidence enough then surely the way he then launches himself off that trailing foot to inflict maximum damage is enough. You're merely preempting the FA's (gutless) decision in attempt to appear learned and wise.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 12 Feb 19 12.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Having perused the incident a few times I find it inconclusive.The FA should not be influenced by the previous charge concerning Ibrahimovic, they should view the incident at the weekend in isolation. It isn't a Court of Law. I think the previous charge is relevant. In a Tribunal situation it quite probably would be taken into account.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Feb 19 1.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by crvenaeagle
Oh stop trying to come off high and mighty about this mate. If the broken stride to land on Oliviera's face isn't evidence enough then surely the way he then launches himself off that trailing foot to inflict maximum damage is enough. You're merely preempting the FA's (gutless) decision in attempt to appear learned and wise. With respect this is hogwash. I had not even considered what the FA would conclude when I made my comments. Edited by Willo (12 Feb 2019 1.52pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Buckspalace Thornborough 12 Feb 19 2.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Really is sickening that the FA are not even looking at this could easily have taken the guys eye out.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.