You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson
September 20 2019 5.19pm

BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 80 of 183 < 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 >

 

View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 07 Jul 19 12.35pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

Two judges had already decided that what he live-streamed was not prejudicial to the case. What he said on that stream was already reported information as he previously had done legal training. The court provided no information on reporting restrictions on the day, which they are supposed to.

The attorney general Ė the legal adviser to the government! Ė removed the original charges and decided to add two different allegations. One of which was by speaking and photographing the defendants (racially aggravated gang rapists) could have made them feel anxious. Really?

The attorney general believes this trial is in the public's interest and is costing taxpayers millions.

Edited by Penge Eagle (07 Jul 2019 12.37pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 07 Jul 19 12.36pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle


I already have!

By breaking the reporting restrictions, which apply to everyone and not just to journalists, he opened up the possibility of defence lawyers claiming that their client's defence had been compromised and the Judge agreeing and ordering a mistrial. The accused could then be set free pending a decision on whether a retrial would happen.

Alongside that were the ongoing investigations all of which were linked. The authorities obviously wanted things to be kept quiet as possible whilst those investigations were carried out, presumably to avoid those being investigated being made aware they were under scrutiny.

Blatant disregard for lawfully imposed restrictions has resulted in his conviction. No excuses possible.

Lawfully imposed restrictions which include super-injunctions and gagging orders. There seem to be a few things itís not in our interest to know about.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 07 Jul 19 1.55pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle


I already have!

By breaking the reporting restrictions, which apply to everyone and not just to journalists, he opened up the possibility of defence lawyers claiming that their client's defence had been compromised and the Judge agreeing and ordering a mistrial. The accused could then be set free pending a decision on whether a retrial would happen.

Alongside that were the ongoing investigations all of which were linked. The authorities obviously wanted things to be kept quiet as possible whilst those investigations were carried out, presumably to avoid those being investigated being made aware they were under scrutiny.

Blatant disregard for lawfully imposed restrictions has resulted in his conviction. No excuses possible.


You are like a repeating record.
They got done end of.
Hows your take on child rape.
As that was the court case.
A bit more serious than the accused and summarily convicted scum bags.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 07 Jul 19 2.00pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

7/7 today.
Thoughts on the thread if you wish to.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 07 Jul 19 2.13pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

I donít know but he claims he did and court officials have agreed.

What "Robinson"claims and what is true are not necessarily the same. Court officials? Who exactly and why? Court officials are not lawyers, let alone Judges, so not competant to even offer an opinion.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 07 Jul 19 2.37pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst


You are like a repeating record.
They got done end of.
Hows your take on child rape.
As that was the court case.
A bit more serious than the accused and summarily convicted scum bags.

The only reason for the repetition is the repeated misunderstanding of why "Robinson" was charged and found guilty.

This has no bearing on my, or your, opinion on child rape or anything else. It's only connection to it is via the cases that "Robinson's" activities might have compromised.

Attempting to divert the discussion onto another subject, however important you might feel it to be, is to completely miss the point.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 07 Jul 19 2.45pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

The only reason for the repetition is the repeated misunderstanding of why "Robinson" was charged and found guilty.

This has no bearing on my, or your, opinion on child rape or anything else. It's only connection to it is via the cases that "Robinson's" activities might have compromised.

Attempting to divert the discussion onto another subject, however important you might feel it to be, is to completely miss the point.

Answer the question then as this specific part of the post is about the court case I know.
What's your take on Muslim child grooming gangs.
The thread is about TR.
If you look the start is about his actions generally.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 07 Jul 19 2.55pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What "Robinson"claims and what is true are not necessarily the same. Court officials? Who exactly and why? Court officials are not lawyers, let alone Judges, so not competant to even offer an opinion.

Court officials would know if there were reporting restrictions but donít let that get in the way of your argument.
Your respect for the law is laudable but law and justice arenít the same thing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 07 Jul 19 3.42pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst


You are like a repeating record.
They got done end of.
Hows your take on child rape.
As that was the court case.
A bit more serious than the accused and summarily convicted scum bags.

Well mine's a flipping sight more serious than yours and 'Robinson's'.

If he were interested in any other cases this would look a whole lot different. He is just after exposure to his main tenet, that Muslims are 'bad' in UK society. This is just a vehicle for his agenda

When I see him campaign about the huge cases that I have highlighted recently on this site that don't happen to be primarily Muslims, then perhaps you can say his concern is child rape. And those cases have not seen any justice, unlike many of the recent grooming gang cases that 'Robinson' has been using and in so doing jeopardising.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 07 Jul 19 4.12pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Well mine's a flipping sight more serious than yours and 'Robinson's'.

If he were interested in any other cases this would look a whole lot different. He is just after exposure to his main tenet, that Muslims are 'bad' in UK society. This is just a vehicle for his agenda

When I see him campaign about the huge cases that I have highlighted recently on this site that don't happen to be primarily Muslims, then perhaps you can say his concern is child rape. And those cases have not seen any justice, unlike many of the recent grooming gang cases that 'Robinson' has been using and in so doing jeopardising.

Go on; what white grooming gangs do you have info on.
how do you feel about the muslims who committed these acts then.
I'm sure that if a white gang was doing this their names and faces would be everywhere.
Hence they arnt everywhere so there are not white grooming gangs in the amounts of Muslim ones.
Why are all these Muslim men not being plastered up everywhere.
Because our glorious leaders want everyone to be one big happy family.
s*** utopia dont exist.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dollardays's Profile dollardays Flag 07 Jul 19 5.09pm Send a Private Message to dollardays Add dollardays as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Go on; what white grooming gangs do you have info on.
how do you feel about the muslims who committed these acts then.
I'm sure that if a white gang was doing this their names and faces would be everywhere.
Hence they arnt everywhere so there are not white grooming gangs in the amounts of Muslim ones.
Why are all these Muslim men not being plastered up everywhere.
Because our glorious leaders want everyone to be one big happy family.
s*** utopia dont exist.

In fairness the church got away with this s*** on an industrial scale for decades.. but you're of course right than no depraved groups or gangs of whatever ilk should be able to get away with this.

Edited by dollardays (07 Jul 2019 5.54pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dicky boy's Profile dicky boy Flag Rainham.........Kent 07 Jul 19 5.49pm Send a Private Message to dicky boy Add dicky boy as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

What "Robinson"claims and what is true are not necessarily the same. Court officials? Who exactly and why? Court officials are not lawyers, let alone Judges, so not competant to even offer an opinion.

I know that most wont want to but take a minute or 30 and just listen to his defense,he (Tommy) has independant witnesses that there was NO information about a no media policy,unless it was already in the public domain.......So please put all your bias aside and just take awhile openminded to hear this.
If this is not a stitch up I dont know what would be,they want him off the streets and in critical danger as soon as poss.Buy hey thats my biased opinion.
Hopefully the link will work.
[Link]

 


ROY HODGSON's RED''BLUE ARMY

Ohhhh Lukaaaa ooooooh....
Ohhhhh Lukaaaa ooooooh....
He come's from Serbia...........
He'll F**king Murdaaa Yaaa..........
Ohhhhh Lukaaaa ooooooh........


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 80 of 183 < 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC fake news - Tommy Robinson