You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Fury v Wilder 2
April 25 2024 2.44am

Fury v Wilder 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

 

View kennybrowns leftfoot's Profile kennybrowns leftfoot Flag Reigate 27 Feb 19 2.48pm Send a Private Message to kennybrowns leftfoot Add kennybrowns leftfoot as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays


So what? What is this absurd requirement to approve of different groups? Muhammad Ali said a lot of stuff as well, yet he's loved.

There are other reasons why someone might not be too fond of Fury.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2019 9.20am)

No requirement at all... That's why I said 'in my experience'..

 


Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 27 Feb 19 3.11pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by kennybrowns leftfoot

No requirement at all... That's why I said 'in my experience'..

So why would you make that particular point?

I get it if you don't particularly like Fury for that reason..and/or travellers...but if Fury doesn't like person A because of reason B....as long as he isn't slashing their tires who really gives a damn.....but cool, I'm a bit touchy about this kind of thing.

Fury is a pathological liar who regularly contradicts himself and the stuff about giving his entire Wilder purse to charity was just probably another huge whopper.

I remember Fury's anti gay comments.....soon afterwards he snogged some apparently gay bloke on camera.

Fury is what he is.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2019 3.41pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
deleted user Flag 27 Feb 19 10.36pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

So why would you make that particular point?

I get it if you don't particularly like Fury for that reason..and/or travellers...but if Fury doesn't like person A because of reason B....as long as he isn't slashing their tires who really gives a damn.....but cool, I'm a bit touchy about this kind of thing.

Fury is a pathological liar who regularly contradicts himself and the stuff about giving his entire Wilder purse to charity was just probably another huge whopper.

I remember Fury's anti gay comments.....soon afterwards he snogged some apparently gay bloke on camera.

Fury is what he is.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2019 3.41pm)

People often look to qualities and character in high achievers both in and out of their sport. It's hardly that out there. sh!t talking between fighters, most can get behind. This stuff, not so much.

Fury's comments were extreme. Maybe Ken has gay family members that he values and respects and as such finds it distasteful for someone with a public profile to be comparing gay people to child abusers and saying they're hellbound. It's a perfectly sensible reason to decide 'not for me, mate'. If you're touchy about it, that's not his problem.

If someone was waxing lyrical about black boxer Ali you'd be the first in line with how racist you believe he was, so 'who gives a damn about what people say' is hypocritical, because obviously you do. Just not about this group of people.

Edited by dollardays (27 Feb 2019 10.37pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
deleted user Flag 27 Feb 19 10.43pm

Originally posted by Lyons550


Completely agree with that. As soon as he signed the deal it meant that with 3 different broadcasters in the with hats in the ring the liklihood of a unified champion is further away now than ever.

Yes its the decades old annoyance with boxing, the way in which through managers and TV deals and all the other crap, the fights fans crave drift into the ether. Even when they do happen, like with Mayweather Pacquiao it's years too late.

This is one area where MMA has its finger on the pulse. The match ups people want to see actually tend to happen.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 27 Feb 19 11.09pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

People often look to qualities and character in high achievers both in and out of their sport. It's hardly that out there. sh!t talking between fighters, most can get behind. This stuff, not so much.

Fury's comments were extreme. Maybe Ken has gay family members that he values and respects and as such finds it distasteful for someone with a public profile to be comparing gay people to child abusers and saying they're hellbound. It's a perfectly sensible reason to decide 'not for me, mate'.


It's the default within most socially conservative religious people to dislike homosexuality. As long as it doesn't involve physically harming anyone it's for that individual.

I did find Fury's connection on child abuse and homosexuality a bit off however......I find that with a lot of what he says. However, he punches people for a living and if people consider his opinions on anything important to their lives that's their issue.

Originally posted by dollardays

If you're touchy about it, that's not his problem.

With respect, that's kind of what I meant.

Originally posted by dollardays

If someone was waxing lyrical about black boxer Ali you'd be the first in line with how racist you believe he was, so 'who gives a damn about what people say' is hypocritical, because obviously you do. Just not about this group of people.

I think this is a good point. Obviously we all have different buttons and while I most definitely support an individual's right to not like whatever I would probably comment.

However, in this area I would probably most react to what I thought was hypocrisy or double standards.....Tyson may have been anti homosexual in his remarks but I'm not sure where the double standard is....besides like I said, I'm not even sure of where Tyson actually stands on that issue because he says one thing and then does another.

However as an aside, you aren't quite right when you specifically mention Ali. It would be a fair comment to how I viewed Ali in the past but that viewpoint has changed somewhat.

When I watch the Parkinson interviews with Ali, I remember how I was once convinced that Ali was wrong and racist. And while the 'white devil' stuff is overtly silly I've learnt far more since those days and now I understand the brainwashing that comes with the 'racist' term that's used on people.

Everybody has some form of group preference, for some it's more class based for others it's more racial...for some more intellect, cultural or beauty based....Society only considers one as vitally important but they are all still some form of group preference. What matters to me is how far a individual takes that...Are they prepared to treat someone badly over it...Are they hypocritical...that kind of thing.

Anyway....For me, Ali was essentially a good man, who...excepting the flaws we all have, did what he thought was right, and he was a product of his environment and personality.

He wasn't a hypocrite as far as I'm aware.


Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2019 11.15pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
deleted user Flag 27 Feb 19 11.58pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I think this is a good point. Obviously we all have different buttons and while I most definitely support an individual's right to not like whatever I would probably comment.

However, in this area I would probably most react to what I thought was hypocrisy or double standards.....Tyson may have been anti homosexual in his remarks but I'm not sure where the double standard is....besides like I said, I'm not even sure of where Tyson actually stands on that issue because he says one thing and then does another.

However as an aside, you aren't quite right when you specifically mention Ali. It would be a fair comment to how I viewed Ali in the past but that viewpoint has changed somewhat.

When I watch the Parkinson interviews with Ali, I remember how I was once convinced that Ali was wrong and racist. And while the 'white devil' stuff is overtly silly I've learnt far more since those days and now I understand the brainwashing that comes with the 'racist' term that's used on people.

Everybody has some form of group preference, for some it's more class based for others it's more racial...for some more intellect, cultural or beauty based....Society only considers one as vitally important but they are all still some form of group preference. What matters to me is how far a individual takes that...Are they prepared to treat someone badly over it...Are they hypocritical...that kind of thing.

Anyway....For me, Ali was essentially a good man, who...excepting the flaws we all have, did what he thought was right, and he was a product of his environment and personality.

He wasn't a hypocrite as far as I'm aware.


Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2019 11.15pm)

I remember from the cricket thread, when Joe Root had positive, and may I add, accurate words to say about gay people while defending himself, you'd suddenly lost respect for him. When Fury implies that gay people are like child molesters and will go to hell, 'it's only words' why does it matter'. You very much care about words and I view this to be a preference for words that attack, rather than defend specific groups. You have a lack of affinity for certain groups who obviously mean you no harm, and will pass it off as 'it's not like that, i'm defending against the 'virtue signalling masses'. Essentially though it's just a cobbled together justification to yourself for why it's fine to act with or excuse cruelty towards groups you don't feel that much of a connection with. To a more measured extent maybe everyone does that. If you're looking through the prism of what helps and what hurts though, this isn't a tough one.

As you say, with Ali I see him as a product of his time and partially judge him by that criteria. I also don't rule out that whether black or white some still have an 'Ali upbringing' or experience even now. The passage of time and indeed someones death can lead us to viewing them forever on 'highlight reel' loop, especially that's all that most see or know. As I said that's how I tend to view Tyson Fury now too on account that his current attitude and a focus that appears to be more embracing than attacking. As for Ali's actual views though, about say races mixing, well I find those rather sad. Society was very different. Someone like Anthony Joshua would be far less likely to spout or hold such views than someone from that era, and I don't see that as a bad thing really. Each to their own though.

I know it's all the rage with the fringes of black and white identity groups, but I don't think him or anyone else overly identifying with their race is particularly engaged in an act of de-brainwashing. If anything it's rather sad that anyone can get through life and think that their blackness or whiteness alone is some profound revelation.It's doesn't speak to a connection with or willingness to connect to others in a meaningful way.

Edited by dollardays (28 Feb 2019 12.05am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Feb 19 12.30am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

I remember from the cricket thread, when Joe Root had positive, and may I add, accurate words to say about gay people while defending himself, you'd suddenly lost respect for him. When Fury implies that gay people are like child molesters and will go to hell, 'it's only words' why does it matter'. You very much care about words and I view this to be a preference for words that attack, rather than defend specific groups. You have a lack of affinity for certain groups who obviously mean you no harm, and will pass it off as 'it's not like that, i'm defending against the 'virtue signalling masses'. Essentially though it's just a cobbled together justification to yourself for why it's fine to act with or excuse cruelty towards groups you don't feel that much of a connection with. To a more measured extent maybe everyone does that. If you're looking through the prism of what helps and what hurts though, this isn't a tough one.

Yep, I don't know that I'd go as far as say 'cruelty' but generally I think your points here are probably fair. I have my worldview and I pursue and am prepared to argue it out with those who oppose it.

I've covered the Joe Root thing, I gave the reasons there.

Originally posted by dollardays

As you say, with Ali I see him as a product of his time and partially judge him by that criteria. I also don't rule out that black or white some have an 'Ali upbringing' or experience now. The passage of time and indeed someones death can lead us to viewing them forever on 'highlight reel' loop, especially that's all that most see or know. As I said that's how I tend to view Tyson Fury now too on account that his current attitude and a focus that appears to be more embracing than attacking. As for Ali's actual views though, about say races mixing, well I find those rather sad. Society was very different. Someone like Anthony Joshua would be far less likely to spout or hold such views than someone from that era, and I don't see that as a bad thing really. Each to their own though.

I think it's sad in one regard...in terms of egalitarianism....but in practical terms egalitarianism doesn't actually work...it's like communism...it would be the perfect system if you were controlling ants instead of people.

However in terms of Ali I also see his point. He doesn't want his race to die out, which is the inevitable consequence of no one pushing back on that.

I think all types of consenting societies have a right to exist....but we don't really live in an era where it's discussed officially because of the 'racism' fear.


Originally posted by dollardays

I know it's all the rage with the fringes of black and white identity groups, but I don't think him or anyone else overly identifying with their race is particularly engaged in anything useful or an act of de-brainwashing. If anything it's rather sad that anyone can get through life and think that their blackness or whiteness alone is some profound revelation.It's doesn't speak to a connection with or willingness to connect to others in a meaningful way.

Edited by dollardays (28 Feb 2019 12.03am)

I use to agree with that...before the era of identity politics when we were all encouraged to be colour blind...Certainly In meritocracy we should always be....Also I would certainly still agree that at the moment there are more important things in the world. However, I'm not of the view that it doesn't matter at all.....When I think about these things....which admittedly is more than I use to, I do find the 'Japanese have a right to Japan' the 'African has a right to Africa' argument hard to disagree with.

When you look back in history lots of groups have been mixed out of existence....I don't think any of them went willingly.

But do I want to treat people unfairly because of that....nope. Is someone's skin colour a reflection on their character? Ali for example, might have held the views he had but he was surrounded by friends of all hues......We are all accidents of birth and deserving of a crack at life.

So I don't think there is a perfect answer to any of this....Not from here anyway.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Feb 2019 12.48am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Pussay Patrol Flag 28 Feb 19 6.08am

oh my. Seems almost every thread has become 1 person's crusade to bore the life out of everyone

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 28 Feb 19 10.48am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

oh my. Seems almost every thread has become 1 person's crusade to bore the life out of everyone

Yes. Perhaps you should take a few weeks off, go and see a couple of tulip farms maybe, and give everyone a rest.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Forest Hillbilly's Profile Forest Hillbilly Flag in a hidey-hole 28 Feb 19 1.35pm Send a Private Message to Forest Hillbilly Add Forest Hillbilly as a friend

I recall the Mike Tyson era of the mid-late 80's. Tyson fought everyone he could. Former champions were coming out of retirement, just for the pay-day.(only the WBC, WBA and IBF belts then)

Too many broadcasters and too many belts and interested parties have made getting fights on far too complicated.

If I were Tyson Fury, I would have seen this coming and taken the 5 fight deal he has done, because it's "cash up front". He pulled the trigger at the right time.

It seems boxing fans are being denied the real deal yet again.

 


"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View kennybrowns leftfoot's Profile kennybrowns leftfoot Flag Reigate 28 Feb 19 2.04pm Send a Private Message to kennybrowns leftfoot Add kennybrowns leftfoot as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

So why would you make that particular point?

I get it if you don't particularly like Fury for that reason..and/or travellers...but if Fury doesn't like person A because of reason B....as long as he isn't slashing their tires who really gives a damn.....but cool, I'm a bit touchy about this kind of thing.

Fury is a pathological liar who regularly contradicts himself and the stuff about giving his entire Wilder purse to charity was just probably another huge whopper.

I remember Fury's anti gay comments.....soon afterwards he snogged some apparently gay bloke on camera.

Fury is what he is.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2019 3.41pm)

Because as I said, in my experience of dealing with travellers they tend to be very racist and homophobic... So that's why I made that particular point... Can only make points on what I experience can't I??

 


Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Feb 19 2.14pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by kennybrowns leftfoot

Because as I said, in my experience of dealing with travellers they tend to be very racist and homophobic... So that's why I made that particular point... Can only make points on what I experience can't I??


Yep, that's fair enough.....just chewing the cud.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Fury v Wilder 2