You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Colonisation and plantation of rural Ireland
April 23 2024 3.12pm

The Colonisation and plantation of rural Ireland

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

 

View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 31 May 19 9.13pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by the.universal

Being so patronising is not a good look. You don’t have all the answers, just your own opinions. Others have theirs. That is ok.

That is most certainly OK but one has to see what I post in the context of to what and to whom I am responding.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 31 May 19 9.20pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

Possibly the point being made is that no matter who lives where, the actual number of white people would only ever reduce or be 'bred out of existence' where

1 Birth rates of white parents drop

2 People elect to have children with someone of a different race, in which case to you, the white person would've been 'bred out of existence'. Though of course that's a somewhat subjective way of looking at that.


In circumstance one, it's not the fault of non whites, that the birthrate of another race is low, or lowering

In circumstance two, if someone has a child with someone of another race, they clearly have priorities or considerations in life that are not centered on their baby being white

Certainly though, where immigration numbers are high, in percentage terms the national, racial and indeed cultural demographics change, and I'm firmly in favour of immigration numbers being set by the people rather than self interested elites. Of course, reality teaches us that the peoples' voice on these numbers is not often heard, hence the current political mess. But still, racially, we each get to self elect whether we view it of primary importance if our racial line continues, above and beyond all other factors. I wouldn't say that it's at the top of most peoples' priorities in life, but each to their own.

Well number one and two will lead to the dilution and ultimately the absorption of white culture and Northern European genotype.

It is not really a question of priorities but the recognition and understanding that we will be the next Neanderthals.
Do we really think that erasing thousands of years of our own evolution and culture doesn't matter?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 31 May 19 9.48pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

Possibly the point being made is that no matter who lives where, the actual number of white people would only ever reduce or be 'bred out of existence' where

1 Birth rates of white parents drop

2 People elect to have children with someone of a different race, in which case to you, the white person would've been 'bred out of existence'. Though of course that's a somewhat subjective way of looking at that.


In circumstance one, it's not the fault of non whites, that the birthrate of another race is low, or lowering

In circumstance two, if someone has a child with someone of another race, they clearly have priorities or considerations in life that are not centered on their baby being white

Certainly though, where immigration numbers are high, in percentage terms the national, racial and indeed cultural demographics change, and I'm firmly in favour of immigration numbers being set by the people rather than self interested elites. Of course, reality teaches us that the peoples' voice on these numbers is not often heard, hence the current political mess. But still, racially, we each get to self elect whether we view it of primary importance if our racial line continues, above and beyond all other factors. I wouldn't say that it's at the top of most peoples' priorities in life, but each to their own.

There is an interesting point here about the birthrate of Europeans in general and that has been in decline over a considerable period. A couple of sociologists/ scientists have suggested that with birthrates declining, basically there are quite a few European countries in danger of halving (which is pretty drastic) their original population.
I'm not going to state anything about how many immigrants have come in, or how many children they have etc. as I just don't know. I have a suspicion there are some groupings of immigrants with relatively high birthrates but wouldn't know for sure.
However, getting to the point, perhaps governments will recognise the problem at some stage - perhaps people will at some stage. I suppose there could be a possibility of encouraging and perhaps incentivising having children somehow. Birthrates could increase somehow.
I believe Italy has one of the lowest birthrates. Ireland just about replaces its population and, I believe, has Western Europe's highest birthrate.
I remember, some years ago now Greek Cyprus offering incentives to people to have children. This was mainly to do with being able to rival the Turks. I believe they were paying something like 40k per child!
I remember as for a moment I considered going there and getting 40k but immediately thought better of it.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 01 Jun 19 9.12am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

not sure if somebody can explain me....

Longford has the highest rate of unemployment in the country.

[Link]
.
and consequently the cheapest housing
[Link]

and a very depressed local economy with not much doing. So what is attracting so much inward migration ? Surely the places with most jobs/economic-opportunity would be most affected ?

What lessons were learned from the Plantation of Ulster ?

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View corkery's Profile corkery Flag Cork City 01 Jun 19 11.06am Send a Private Message to corkery Add corkery as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

not sure if somebody can explain me....

Longford has the highest rate of unemployment in the country.

[Link]
.
and consequently the cheapest housing
[Link]

and a very depressed local economy with not much doing. So what is attracting so much inward migration ? Surely the places with most jobs/economic-opportunity would be most affected ?

What lessons were learned from the Plantation of Ulster ?

Nobody can afford to live in Ireland's cities. Far too expensive.

 


We'll never die

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Beanyboysmd's Profile Beanyboysmd Flag 03 Jun 19 9.35pm Send a Private Message to Beanyboysmd Add Beanyboysmd as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Well number one and two will lead to the dilution and ultimately the absorption of white culture and Northern European genotype.

It is not really a question of priorities but the recognition and understanding that we will be the next Neanderthals.
Do we really think that erasing thousands of years of our own evolution and culture doesn't matter?

Very roundabout way of saying "Britains for white people innit?" I really wish people would just say it instead of having to invent buzzwords to soften what they mean. If someones point of view is so ugly that they have to give it disguises and decorations, it probably is an ugly point of view...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ChrisGC Flag Wantage 04 Jun 19 8.22am

Didn't Erdogan say Islam would conquer Europe through the womb? Nuff said.

I ain't against immigration. I'm from a family of Irish immigrants who came in the late 50s along with vast amounts of other Irish and Carribbeans, most of whom integrated well and were of benefit to the rebuild of society and economy after the war.

This didn't come without issues. The knife problem in London is mostly a hangover of Carribbean culture from places like Kingston, but could be tackled with a firm but understanding hand.

None of this really bothers me as Sikh, Irish, eastern European cultures aren't too far removed from the British in terms of values and could be brought up to code with the right amount of indigenous influence (for example, I don't like how Romanians walk about spitting everywhere and aren't shy of telling them when they do it on site in front of me. They just don't know it's unacceptable so once they're told they're usually ok). Islam however...
There is no integration, the Qu'ran forbids it. It's convert or die, and even third or fourth generation Muslims end up in IS. Here is where the real problem lies and I honestly believe that immigration to Britain from Muslim countries should be reduced to zero until we get a handle on this.

It's an evil and backwards ideology, incompatible with our civilised way of life. Adjust and reject it and embrace our culture or leave, simples.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 04 Jun 19 8.38am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Well number one and two will lead to the dilution and ultimately the absorption of white culture and Northern European genotype.

It is not really a question of priorities but the recognition and understanding that we will be the next Neanderthals.
Do we really think that erasing thousands of years of our own evolution and culture doesn't matter?

So you think white people are a different species to others. That is highly enlightening and explains your posts

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jun 19 8.40am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Beanyboysmd

Very roundabout way of saying "Britains for white people innit?" I really wish people would just say it instead of having to invent buzzwords to soften what they mean. If someones point of view is so ugly that they have to give it disguises and decorations, it probably is an ugly point of view...


I guess for the same reason, you don't say, 'Britain's for black people'.

Because it's a reductionist and inaccurate parody of what's been said.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 04 Jun 19 10.16am Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by Beanyboysmd

Very roundabout way of saying "Britains for white people innit?" I really wish people would just say it instead of having to invent buzzwords to soften what they mean. If someones point of view is so ugly that they have to give it disguises and decorations, it probably is an ugly point of view...

Firstly the thread is not about Britain. But it is about one of the poorest places on these islands. In a country that never had an Empire and its associated 21st Century guilt trip.

Secondly, 'colour' is not the point and is used as a weapon by lefties to silence all and sundry. The original news story from Gemma O'Doherty covered white kids in the school being from Eastern Europe and wherever.

The wholesale replacement of an identity, a culture, and an ethnic group is forbidden by the UN. Just ask any Tibetan about the Tsunami of Chinese moving into their country and see how they feel about it ? Identity & culture is nothing to do with colour.
And yet we see in Longford, a State assisted displacement and what can only be described as a Colonisation. The speed of the takeover has been breathtaking to behold.

In the blink of an eye Longford went from a sleepy quiet backwater with poverty to a building Site for investor-led Social Housing....and then into Longford of 2019. Gemma O'Doherty is the first journalist with the balls to ask 'what the f...ck is going on?'

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Jun 19 10.51am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

So you think white people are a different species to others. That is highly enlightening and explains your posts

Don't waste my time with your nonsense please.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 04 Jun 19 10.58am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Beanyboysmd

Very roundabout way of saying "Britains for white people innit?" I really wish people would just say it instead of having to invent buzzwords to soften what they mean. If someones point of view is so ugly that they have to give it disguises and decorations, it probably is an ugly point of view...

Colour is really only a matter of circumstance. It just so happens that the English are white. They could just as easily have been black. That is not really any sort of difining factor. However, it is useful for when non whites want to play the race card.

This is about retaining my culture and heritage in the face of globalist indifference.

Would you be happy to surrender yours?


Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (04 Jun 2019 10.59am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > The Colonisation and plantation of rural Ireland