Your reply implied that you only use the term because of the guy committed this act. That isn't the case, it's entered regular usage for you and hrolf on here, as I said following its use in mass murder manifestos. You have absorbed it into your schema. If you want to use it use it. GO WILD WITH IT!

It's useful, much like those on the left whining about 'micro aggressions', or the rights 'NPCs', because you know that as soon as you hear these terms being used in seriousness people have bought into uncommon batches of beliefs where 99% of the public wouldn't know what on earth was being talked about.

We cannot just sit back and wait for things to happen. We need to be pro-active and control the agenda so we steer things to the conclusions we want.

What we cannot do is turn back time. We are where we are. Now we need to decide where we want to be and how to get there. Which is why I want to remove all religion from all schools and public places and replace it with a drive to ensure all citizens first respect and then love our country and our culture.

We need to make sure that happens, but not through force, as that never works, but through involvement and education.

Dow Egberts all the way

Edited by dollardays (07 Aug 2019 1.23am)

If you moved to Cornwall we could get a good sitcom going with you and Wiz

On paper, 100% agree with you, if anyone ran on the back of removing all religion from all schools, I would vote for it in a heartbeat.
Big issue is with the "We need to be pro-active and control the agenda..." part. "We" cant agree on what the issue is, or even if there is one. I don't see that there is an issue at the moment other than maybe the press hammering almost dehumanising language to all foreigners to appeal to people that want to hear it.
I stand almost polar opposite to a lot of the people here and neither side are going to move from our position no matter how many arguments we have here...
If me and...for example...Stirlingsays can't agree on what the issues are, "We" can't even agree on what the agenda would be. You throw another 65 million people in there, nobody is controlling anything...

Love your concept on using "Soft-power" to instil national pride though, I just don't think it would work

Don’t underestimate nature. In this instance, do so at the peril of mankind. Don’t ever think we can ‘manage’ nature. Nature is a part of this world that protects it. We are a mere tenant who occasionally upsets the equilibrium which results in dramatic kick back. To suggest we can manage nature is frankly laughable.
I site earthquakes, eruptions, tidal waves,flooding, storms, etc. the list is long. All things way beyond our control that nature uses to re balance any imbalance we cause. If you disagree then so be it. This is merely my view. A view which I believe will lead to a significant reduction in mankind in years to come.