You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > 80th anniversary of Germany invading poland...
April 23 2024 11.07am

80th anniversary of Germany invading poland...

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

 

View ex hibitionist's Profile ex hibitionist Online Flag Hastings 06 Sep 19 10.50am Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

stirling my friend in these brexit days everyone else is talking rubbish ... the famines in the mid 19th centrury are a moot point, but hoarding of grain and distribution aimed to keep the price high or export out of India are generally accepted to have exacerbated mass famines - I believe one famine killed up to 10 million - the figures are staggering - and see if you can find Winnie's quotation about the Indians 'despicable people with a despicable religion' made around 1943 I believe then try this link - I know it's from the Guardian not the Daily Mail but the references are not made up (I hope it's not too 'middle class' for you) - frankly what is nonsense is to dismiss 100% another point of view especially when it's clearly well considered - I've got a degree in History btw so I don't just spout to support a cock-eyed world view which has nothing to do with understanding the world and everything to do with convincing my self I'm not a loser.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ex hibitionist's Profile ex hibitionist Online Flag Hastings 06 Sep 19 11.04am Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

For those who wish to know what the 'genetic' English are:

[Link]


you've missed the point - the Anglo-Saxons may well have invaded Britain, the same way that the Normans, Vikings and Romans did, just in bigger numbers, but because 'we' are their descendants we have defaulted to a myth where the anglo-saxons settled here as the country was 'empty' after the romans left - which is more likely: the Anglo Saxons were somehow different to the other invaders or at least as covetous and brutal? neither interpretation is totally true of course, my point is that the issue needs to be revisited because it was more of an invasion than we like to recognise even today, go to Northern Ireland ask a Nationalist or a Unionist about this and you'll get these two different answers, it may help people to understand each others' perspectives a little better - or is what I've stated 100% total rubbish to be completed rejected and disregarded - let's not get boringly defensive.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 06 Sep 19 3.04pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

you've missed the point - the Anglo-Saxons may well have invaded Britain, the same way that the Normans, Vikings and Romans did, just in bigger numbers, but because 'we' are their descendants we have defaulted to a myth where the anglo-saxons settled here as the country was 'empty' after the romans left - which is more likely: the Anglo Saxons were somehow different to the other invaders or at least as covetous and brutal? neither interpretation is totally true of course, my point is that the issue needs to be revisited because it was more of an invasion than we like to recognise even today, go to Northern Ireland ask a Nationalist or a Unionist about this and you'll get these two different answers, it may help people to understand each others' perspectives a little better - or is what I've stated 100% total rubbish to be completed rejected and disregarded - let's not get boringly defensive.

I'll tackle the British in India point later.....Perhaps Churchill as well.

My particular point of criticism was on your descriptive understanding of: 'it goes back to the beginning I believe, the English invaded England'.

Also in your post here you seem to be describing the Anglo-Saxons as one tribe who invaded and displaced others when they came from different regions and invaded at different times and fought each other at different times.

The Anglo-Saxon title is very much a generalized description of the English now....and it's generalized as the genetic percentages fall over more groups than that....the video I linked to would explain that.

Outside of that specific 'English' point. I'd comment that your perspective, appears as inherently egalitarian in nature whereas mine is only partly so and far less idealistic perhaps.

That being the case our views and historical perpectives are probably going to be incompatible to an extent.

Still it will be interesting to explore.

Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Sep 2019 3.17pm)

GeneticEnglish.JPG Attachment: GeneticEnglish.JPG (164.32Kb)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
deleted user Flag 06 Sep 19 3.33pm

I'd certainly recommend 23&me or ancestry.co.uk for a sober and balanced look at what our genetics tell us about our ourselves and our ancestry. It can offer useful perspective.

23&me can be extremely useful for the purposes of making adjustments for health conditions you're genetically more susceptible to as well. There are websites you can plug the data into they break it all down to a fairly granular level.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 07 Sep 19 4.26am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I could write a long piece on the British on India but essentially I'll link you to a video instead....and yes, Churchill is in there as well.

[Link]

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 07 Sep 19 4.10pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

i heard a rumour the Poles hate Churchill even more than they hate Hitler or Stalin. Any experts on here can illuminate ?

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 07 Sep 19 4.42pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

the mass famines in India under the raj are a dark stain on this country and Churchill's attitude to Bangladesh is vile and inhumane, without the proactive sadism of the Nazis, but utterly callous and indifferent to human suffering. we could do with a bit of revisionism - not snowflake apologies but just an intelligent understanding that at times we have been the bad guys - it goes back to the beginning I believe, the English invaded England and were just as horrible as the normans, Vikings and romans, that's why celts are still defensive towards us.

the Brits invented the Concentration Camp.

and we will not mention the genocide Famine in 1840's ireland. Lord Trevelyan was a Hitler. Or its better grammar to say Hitler was a Trevelyan.

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 07 Sep 19 4.55pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

the Brits invented the Concentration Camp.

and we will not mention the genocide Famine in 1840's ireland. Lord Trevelyan was a Hitler. Or its better grammar to say Hitler was a Trevelyan.

No they didn't....that's just anti British propaganda.

The first 'modern' usage would have been by the Americans against the native American Indians in the 1830s.

The basic idea of forcing enemy civilians to leave their homes and gather in one place under guard is thousands of years old and the first known to do it was the ancient Assyrians.

The Inca of Peru did it. Nina Crespi mentions the Russians doing it in the 18th century.

The actual term 'concentration camp' was invented by the Spanish (as campo de concentración or campo de reconcentración) in 1896.

A rebellion had broken out in Cuba, then a Spanish colony, the previous year. The rebels, outnumbered by Spanish government troops, turned to guerilla warfare. In response the Spanish commander Valeriano Weyler ordered the civilians of Cuba to be 'concentrated' in concentration camps under guard so they could not provide the rebels with food, supplies or new recruits. Hundreds of thousands of civilians were interned in these camps, and poor sanitation and lack of food led to as many as a quarter of them dying of disease.

Also the term 'concentration camp' is associated with attempted genocide and the British didn't use it for that either.


Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Sep 2019 5.04pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Sep 19 4.41pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

i heard a rumour the Poles hate Churchill even more than they hate Hitler or Stalin. Any experts on here can illuminate ?

Not quite true but they have been fed years of propaganda about the Polish government in exile. To cut a long story short, they got blown up by a bomb from one of the Cambridge spies. Seeing as how the spies were clearly working for the Soviets the mind boggles as to how it could be concluded that it was Britain's fault.
The Poles main problem centres on thinking that Britain could do much more than it really could. They can't see how much we were second fiddle to the Soviets and the States. Churchill's deal with Stalin was always going to let Stalin do what he liked. What could Britain really do against the Red Army and the stark reality of war.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 08 Sep 19 5.48pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Not quite true but they have been fed years of propaganda about the Polish government in exile. To cut a long story short, they got blown up by a bomb from one of the Cambridge spies. Seeing as how the spies were clearly working for the Soviets the mind boggles as to how it could be concluded that it was Britain's fault.
The Poles main problem centres on thinking that Britain could do much more than it really could. They can't see how much we were second fiddle to the Soviets and the States. Churchill's deal with Stalin was always going to let Stalin do what he liked. What could Britain really do against the Red Army and the stark reality of war.

Neville Chamberlain went to war with Hitler on the Pretext of protecting the Poles. Isnt it ironic that the Poles proportionately paid the heaviest price for WWII. The highest death-toll was polish people....from a neutral country.

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > 80th anniversary of Germany invading poland...