Unsurprisingly not one response to the facts that have cost us ALL for a decade now. Instead we have post upon post regarding internet access/speed/cost etc etc..........

This is the world you've made.
Enjoy

So you are still referring to the Prime Minister using his full name in that childish manner that you have.

I have two questions for you. Firstly if the Tories had seven secret meetings with American drug companies how come you know about them> Were you in on the meetings and secondly why do you give your location as New Addington when your IP address pinpoints you at Epsom? Is your real location too Tory for you to stomach?

You, along with many, should've been afraid when the time came that one average wage could no longer support one average family.
But you never asked why. And sadly you still won't.

But you really should.

They say that a picture paints a thousand words and here's a picture of the man that want to run this country with his mate Gerry Adams

You are right of course but I would counter that by saying that the average family now aspires to and often achieves a much better lifestyle than say 50 years ago.

That is true, but the question is, Should we have bothered?

Many 'democracic' countries seem to be representing Feudal ones but we get to at least pick our rulers.

The State is something the rich have never been comforatble with as it has the power to expropriate, however it is needed to protect their wealth, so how can you game it? By becoming the politicians and controlling the media. If you can control the convesation then people vote for who they feel is the right person rather than any policies.

That's not me saying we should expropriate all the money and land off of the rich. We all want to at least be well off, but the obvious issue with extreme wealth is the power it has to influence.