Of course not. Everyone means exactly what it says. If remaining had been the decision then I would still have argued for PR and the need for UKIP supporters to have a voice in Parliament. That's where these issues need to be aired and decided. Not here or in the media.

I did not call everyone here a bigot did I? Someone called me one which was a very unusual thing for me. All I said was that it at least made me feel at home here, because there are a few I would so describe. Who those are will remain with me! Not that everyone here is one.

My views are my own.

Anybody who describes themselves, or anyone else, by their skin colour gets criticised by me. That includes the media who do it all the time.

I think it just perpetuates the problem. It is unnecessary unless someone is giving a description to the Police. What relevance is a person's skin colour to anything? There are other much more relevant descriptors available in every case.

So what is a referendum then? Why have one if the result means nothing?? Brexit is happening whether you like it or not...I said loser because that is what you are....remain 48% Leave 52% so remain LOST!! Maths not your strong point is it?? 48 is smaller than 52 in most peoples world, not in truro apparently....Think you should realise that a football forum isnt the place to spout your views on politics, there are more suitable places to do this....try your Labour websites, write to Jeremy, he may be interested,..Goodbye loser!

PS sorry for being juvenile, there you are talking down to people who dont share your views...how grown up of you!

Edited by the silurian (22 Feb 2020 8.13am)

This is total bs. I worked with a chap who was Ghanaian, a competitive body builder, so not to be argued with. I was mentoring him when someone called him "that coloured man". He got angry, not because of the comment but because he classed himself as black not coloured. His actual words were "I am a black man".
Would you criticise him? You really do talk b****cks at times

[Link]

We have, for too long, acted as a brake on the EU's aspiration for all-Europe domination over every single aspect of life.

Consequently, we were viewed as the "awkward troublesome member", whilst other countries (the Netherlands, for example) happily hid behind us knowing we'd voice our objections on their behalf. Why spend political capital vetoing something you hate when the UK will do it anyway?

This was especially true in EU budget "negotiations", and we're now seeing the new dynamic of some countries resisting spiraling contributions and being labelled "Un-European" just as we were.

Look at the reaction to the Swedish PM saying the "EU wasn't his priority", as he'd rather spend the additional money they are asking from him on (shock!) his own country. Bless little Leo wailing about how Irish contributions are going up, and he gets less out of them.

Yes, there's always been a fight for the EU trough, but now it's much more open, as there is no longer the UK pariah state to huddle behind.

Now it's tome for them to either put up or shut up. Meekly accept ratcheting away of national powers, previously reserved areas, veto rights, money, legal jurisdiction.... or actually start playing tough with the Brussels mafia.